Double Lumbar Localization of Myelomeningocele: Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a malformation resulting from the neural tube's failure to close during embryonic development, and the majority of the cases of neural tube defects (NTDs) were prevalent as single location lesions along the spine; however, multiple NTDs (MNTDs) are a very rare condition. Only a few cases of MNTDs were found in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 2-month-old male infant prenatally diagnosed with MMC, presented with two unconnected lumbar and lumbosacral epidermal, soft, dome-shaped swellings located on both sides of the midline (paravertebral) covered by intact skin. MRI revealed double MMC at the level of L4-L5, with spinal nerve roots. The patient underwent surgical repair of the defects by replacing the spinal cord and its nerve roots inside the thecal sac and recreating a covering layer around the neural structures to resemble thecal sac. The outcome was favorable, and postoperative head CT scan did not show any complication. CONCLUSION: Our case report is considered the first from Algeria to report the condition and the first to report the occurrence of double lesions in the same spine region. MMC can be associated with neurological deficits or other congenital anomalies, thus it is necessary to thoroughly examine such patients. However, there was no antenatal folic acid deficiency in our case. We recommend antenatal care with adequate folic acid supplementation given that its deficiency during pregnancy is considered a ubiquitous risk factor for the condition. The optimal timing for surgery of MMC cases is 8 ± 5 days. Prenatal intrauterine repair of the condition provides favorable outcomes but carries high fetal and maternal risks. Surgical repair should include the sac removal, the reconstruction of the placode, and the closure of the overlying meninges. With early diagnosis and proper repair of such cases, MMC has good prognosis and favorable outcomes.

Characteristics of the clinical and global neurosurgical research publications from Africa: A scoping review.

Introduction: Scientific research has a direct, profound impact on healthcare systems worldwide. While an upward trend can be observed in the number of produced papers in the neurosurgical specialty, disparities still exist between African neurosurgeons on one side and between African neurosurgeons and neurosurgeons from high income countries, on the other. Research question: This study aims to analyze neurosurgical research produced in Africa to identify gaps in the literature and provide recommendations for aspiring African neurosurgeons for essential research areas. Materials and methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase) were systematically searched for relevant articles on neurosurgery published by African authors. The three main inclusion criteria were: Articles published in the Neurosurgical field, articles published by African authors (whether first authors or co-authors) and articles published in Africa. Data extracted included the study design, scope, neurosurgical subspecialty, and the authors' nationalities. Results: A total of 982 articles were included in the analysis. Of these articles, 889 (90.6%) were primary, 48 (4.9%) secondary, and 44 (4.5%) other types of research. Global Neurosurgery papers represent 7% of African neurosurgery research output. Most common primary studies included retrospective cohort (32.4%), case reports (28.3%), and prospective cohort (13.8%) studies. The most common secondary research articles were literature reviews (4.9%), letters to the editor (1.2%), and systematic reviews and meta-analyses (0.8%). Common research areas were neuro-oncology 242 (24.7%), spinal surgery 157 (16%), and cerebrovascular (14%). The most common nationalities of the first authors were Egyptian (32.4%), Moroccan (15%), and Nigerian (14.2%). Discussion and conclusion: This study identifies increased African authorship in neurosurgical research in recent years. Nevertheless, many countries still lack representation in the neurosurgical research scene.Furthermore, a high percentage of the published papers is of low evidence. Therefore, we recommend that African neurosurgical researchers focus more on clinical trials and systematic reviews that directly translate to improving clinical practice. African neurosurgeons should also consider more collaboration between African authors.

Surfactant replacement therapy as promising treatment for COVID-19: an updated narrative review.

Patients with COVID-19 exhibit similar symptoms to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been shown to target alveolar type 2 lung cells which synthesize and secrete endogenous surfactants leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome in some patients. This was proven by post-mortem histopathological findings revealing desquamated alveolar type 2 cells. Surfactant use in patients with COVID-19 respiratory distress syndrome results in marked improvement in respiratory parameters but not mortality which needs further clinical trials comparing surfactant formulas and modes of administration to decrease the mortality. In addition, surfactants could be a promising vehicle for specific drug delivery as a liposomal carrier, which requires more and more challenging efforts. In this review, we highlight the current reviews and two clinical trials on exogenous surfactant therapy in COVID-19-associated respiratory distress in adults, and how surfactant could be a promising drug to help fight the COVID-19 infection.