Virtual Reality for Anxiety Reduction in Women Undergoing Colposcopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether headset-delivered virtual reality (VR) content affects satisfaction and/or anxiety in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions undergoing colposcopy and colposcopically guided cervical biopsy. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized trial, the authors measured overall satisfaction (100-mm visual analog scale) and situation-specific anxiety (STAI-S) in 247 women with suspected cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions wearing either no VR headset (arm 1, control) or a VR headset before (arm 2) or before and during colposcopy (arm 3). Secondary endpoints were pain, discomfort, and anxiety during colposcopy, heart rate, and 72-hour follow-up parameters: overall satisfaction, bleeding severity, bleeding duration, pain, and use of analgesics. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Median values for overall satisfaction were 100 (interquartile range, 90-100) in controls (n = 83), 100 (95-100) in arm 2 (n = 82), and 100 (95-100) in arm 3 (n = 82), respectively ( p = .92). The median Δ of situational anxiety (baseline vs after colposcopy) was -8 (-13 to -3), -8 (-16.5 to -4), and -10 (-20.5 to -4.5), respectively ( p = .09). The secondary endpoints pain during colposcopy (20 [10-50] vs 20 [10-40] vs 30 [10-50]; p = .65), discomfort during colposcopy (30 [10-50] vs 30 [10-50] vs 20 [10-50]; p = .46), and anxiety during colposcopy (20 [0-50] vs 10 [0-40] vs 10 [0-30]; p = .44), were not different between arms. Follow-up data showed no improvement in the 2 VR arms compared with controls (overall satisfaction, p = .37; bleeding severity, p = .09; pain level, p = .89; duration of pain; p = .23; and use of analgesics; p = .39). Per-protocol analysis did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS: A VR headset showing a 360-degree surround vision film has no effect on satisfaction or anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.

Development and technical validation of an ultrasound nebulizer to deliver intraperitoneal pressurized aerosols in a rat colon cancer peritoneal metastases model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To develop and validate a nebulizer device for anti-cancer research on pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol supply in a preclinical peritoneal metastases (PM) rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For aerosol generation, an ultrasonic nebulizer (USN) was modified. Aerosol analyses were performed ex-vivo by laser diffraction spectrometry (LDS). Intraperitoneal (IP) 99mtechnetium sodium pertechnetate (99mTc) aerosol distribution and deposition were quantified by in-vivo single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and compared to liquid IP instillation of equivalent volume/doses of 99mTc with and without capnoperitoneum. PM was induced by IP injection of HCT116-Luc2 human colon cancer cells in immunosuppressed RNU rats. Tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence imaging (BLI), 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) and tissues examination at necropsy. RESULTS: The USN was able to establish a stable and reproducible capnoperitoneum at a pressure of 8 to 10 mmHg. LDS showed that the USN provides a polydisperse and monomodal aerosol with a volume-weighted diameter of 2.6 µm. At a CO2 flow rate of 2 L/min with an IP residence time of 3.9 s, the highest drug deposition efficiency was found to be 15 wt.-%. In comparison to liquid instillation, nebulization showed the most homogeneous IP spatial drug deposition. Compared to BLI, 18F-FDG-PET was more sensitive to detect smaller PM nodules measuring only 1-2 mm in diameter. BLI, 18F-FDG PET and necropsy analyses showed relevant PM in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: The USN together with the PM rat model are suitable for robust and species-specific preclinical pharmacological studies regarding intraperitoneal delivery of pressurized aerosolized drugs and cancer research.

Video colposcopy versus headlight for large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a randomised trial.

PURPOSE: To compare resected cone mass and resection margin status when performing Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) using video colposcopy (LLETZ-VC) versus a headlight (LLETZ-HL) in women with cervical dysplasia. METHODS: Prospective, randomised trial (monocentric) at a specialised cervical dysplasia unit in a University Hospital. Women with a biopsy-proven CIN2 + or persisting CIN1 or diagnostic LLETZ were recruited and randomised. LLETZ was performed either under video colposcopic vision or using a standard surgical headlight. The primary endpoint was resected cone mass. Secondary endpoints were the rate of involved margins, fragmentation of the specimen, procedure time, time to complete haemostasis (TCH), blood loss, pain, intra- and postoperative complications, and surgeon preference. RESULTS: LLETZ-VC and LLETZ-HL (109 women each) had comparable cone masses (1.57 [0.98-2.37] vs. 1.67 [1.15-2.46] grams; P = 0.454). TCH was significantly shorter in the LLETZ-VC arm (60 [41-95.2] vs. 90 [47.2-130.2] seconds; P = 0.008). There was no statistically significant difference in involved resection margins (6/87 [6.5%] vs. 16/101 [13.7%], P = 0.068) and postoperative complications (13/82 [13.7%] vs. 22/72 [23.4%], P = 0.085). Patient-reported outcomes favoured LLETZ-VC with a lower use of analgesics (6/80 [7.0%] vs. 17/87 [16.3%]; P = 0.049). However, LLETZ-VC was more difficult to perform with significantly lower ratings for handling (7 [5-9] vs. 9 [8-10]; P < 0.001) and general satisfaction (7.5 [5-9] vs. 10 [8-10]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative video colposcopy for LLETZ has minimal benefits at the cost of surgeons' satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04326049 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for rare gynecologic indications: peritoneal metastases from breast and endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with breast (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) is rare and treatment options are limited. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) has demonstrated efficacy against PM from various cancers, but its efficacy in BC/EC patients is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with PM from BC/EC undergoing PIPAC with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2. Data were collected within an international prospective PIPAC registry. Study outcomes were microscopic tumor regression grade (TRG), survival, adverse events (CTCAE), and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: 150 PIPAC procedures in 44 patients (BC/EC = 28/16; mean age 58.8 ± 10.1 and 63.2 ± 10.1 years, respectively) were analyzed. The mean number of PIPACs per patient was 3 (range 0-9) and 3.5 (range 0-10), respectively. Primary/secondary non-access occurred in 4/3 of 150 (5%) procedures. PIPAC induced objective tumor regression as demonstrated by repetitive PM biopsies in 73% (32/44) of patients. Peri- and postoperative CTCAE grade 3 and 4 complications were observed in 12/150 (8%) of procedures. No grade 5 event was observed. After a median follow up of 5.7 (IQR 2.7-13.0) months, overall median survival was 19.6 (95% CI: 7.8-31.5) months (from first PIPAC). QoL indicators (general health, nausea, fatigue, constipation, pain, dyspnea, social, cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning) all improved or were maintained throughout PIPAC treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive intraperitoneal chemotherapy with PIPAC is feasible and safe in patients with PM from BC and EC. PIPAC induces significant histological regression of PM while maintaining QoL.

How long is too long? Application of acetic acid during colposcopy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Application of acetic acid to the cervix followed by colposcopic assessment with or without colposcopically directed biopsy is the standard test used to detect dysplastic lesions of the cervix. However, there is no evidence-based common standard defining how exactly to perform this test. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively define the optimal timing for the colposcopic assessment of acetowhite lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive women referred to our colposcopy unit were recruited. Using a standardized colposcopy protocol, we recorded the most severe colposcopic lesion 1, 3, and 5 minutes after application of acetic acid (primary study end point). The time to first appearance of the most severe colposcopic lesion, highest staining intensity, and fading of the most severe colposcopic lesion were video documented (secondary study end points, assessed independently by 3 raters). Results were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: A total of 300 women were included. After 1 minute, 290 of 300 patients (96.7%) were diagnosed with the most severe colposcopic lesion. This proportion did not improve after 3 minutes (290/300 [96.7%]) or after 5 minutes (233/264 [88.3%]). The proportion of minor and major changes continuously declined over time from 142 in 300 (47.3%; 1 minute) to 107 in 264 (40.5%; 5 minutes) and from 110 in 300 (36.7%) to 91 in 264 (34.5%), respectively. The median time until the first appearance of the most severe colposcopic lesion was 13.5 (interquartile range, 3-27.25) seconds and was significantly lower in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (7 [interquartile range, 1-20] seconds) compared to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (19 [interquartile range, 9-39.5] seconds; P < .001). We observed fading of acetowhite lesions in 78% of cases, occurring at a median of 191 (interquartile range, 120-295) seconds after application of acetic acid. Fading started earlier in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion compared to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (179.5 [interquartile range, 110- 253.25] versus 212.5 [interquartile range, 146.5-300]; P = .044). Overall, the net difference between colposcopic assessments at 3 minutes versus at 1 minute was 1 more high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 1 less low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. CONCLUSION: It is reasonable to conclude that the best time to identify lesions is 1 minute after the application of acetic acid. Continued evaluation for up to 3 minutes may be considered reasonable for an optimal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion yield. However, fading of acetowhite lesions is common, especially in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and supports a recommendation of not prolonging colposcopy beyond 3 minutes.

Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure may be performed under local anesthesia or general anesthesia, and practice patterns differ worldwide. No randomized head-to-head comparison has been published to confirm or refute either practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local anesthesia vs general anesthesia regarding patient satisfaction and procedure-related outcomes such as rates of involved margins, complications, pain, and blood loss. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive women referred to our colposcopy unit were recruited. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure was performed under local anesthesia with 4 intracervical injections of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% or under general anesthesia with fentanyl, propofol, and a laryngeal mask with sevoflurane maintenance. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction assessed on the day of surgery and 14 days thereafter using a Likert scale (score 0-100) and a questionnaire. Secondary endpoints included rates of involved margins, procedure-related complications, pain, blood loss, and surgeon preference. Results were compared using nonparametric and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between July 2018 and February 2020, we randomized 208 women, 108 in the local anesthesia arm and 100 in the general anesthesia arm. In the intention-to-treat analysis, patient satisfaction did not differ between the study groups directly after surgery (Likert scale 100 [90-100] vs 100 [90-100]; P=.077) and 14 days thereafter (Likert scale 100 [80-100] vs 100 [90-100]; P=.079). In the per-protocol analysis, women in the local anesthesia arm had significantly smaller cone volumes (1.11 cm3 [0.70-1.83] vs 1.58 cm3 [1.08-2.69], respectively; P<.001), less intraoperative blood loss (Δhemoglobin, 0.2 g/dL [-0.1 to 0.4] vs 0.5 g/dL [0.2-0.9]; P<.001), and higher satisfaction after 14 days (100 [90-100] vs 100 [80-100]; P=.026), whereas surgeon preference favored general anesthesia (90 [79-100] vs 100 [90-100], respectively; P=.001). All other secondary outcomes did not differ between groups (resection margin status R1, 6.6% vs 2.1% [P=.26]; cone fragmentation, 12.1% vs 6.3% [P=.27]; procedure duration, 151.5 seconds [120-219.5] vs 180 seconds [117-241.5] [P=.34]; time to complete hemostasis, 60 seconds [34-97] vs 70 seconds [48.25-122.25] [P=.08]; complication rate, 3.3% vs 1.1% [P=.59]). In a multivariate analysis, parity (P=.03), type of transformation zone (P=.03), and cone volume (P=.02) and not study group assignment, age, body mass index, and degree of dysplasia independently influenced the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local anesthesia is equally well tolerated and offers patient-reported and procedure-related benefits over general anesthesia, supporting the preferred practice in some institutions and refuting the preferred practice in others.

Ionizing radiation increases the endothelial permeability and the transendothelial migration of tumor cells through ADAM10-activation and subsequent degradation of VE-cadherin.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the changes in permeability of endothelial cell layers after photon irradiation, with a focus on the metalloproteases ADAM10 and ADAM17, and on VE-cadherin, components crucial for the integrity of endothelial intercellular junctions, and their roles in the transmigration of cancer cells through endothelial cell monolayers. METHODS: Primary HUVEC were irradiated with 2 or 4 Gy photons at a dose rate of 5 Gy/min. The permeability of an irradiated endothelial monolayer for macromolecules and tumor cells was analyzed in the presence or absence of the ADAM10/17 inhibitors GI254023X and GW280264X. Expression of ADAM10, ADAM17 and VE-Cadherin in endothelial cells was quantified by immunoblotting and qRT. VE-Cadherin was additionally analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy and ELISA. RESULTS: Ionizing radiation increased the permeability of endothelial monolayers and the transendothelial migration of tumor cells. This was effectively blocked by a selective inhibition (GI254023X) of ADAM10. Irradiation increased both, the expression and activity of ADAM10, which led to increased degradation of VE-cadherin, but also led to higher rates of VE-cadherin internalization. Increased degradation of VE-cadherin was also observed when endothelial monolayers were exposed to tumor-cell conditioned medium, similar to when exposed to recombinant VEGF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a mechanism of irradiation-induced increased permeability and transendothelial migration of tumor cells based on the activation of ADAM10 and the subsequent change of endothelial permeability through the degradation and internalization of VE-cadherin.

Acute colonic pseudoobstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) in gynecologic and obstetric patients: case report and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction or Ogilvie's syndrome (OS) is a rare form of postsurgical or posttraumatic complication. OS rarely occurs in the postoperative course of gynecologic and obstetric patients and is difficult to diagnose. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of an 83-years-old patient with carcinosarcoma of the uterus who developed OS with non-obstructive dilation of the right hemicolon and intraabdominal compression after total abdominal hysterectomy, omentectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Laparotomy with colonic decompression and abdominal dressing was performed. Subsequently, the patient developed pneumonia and peritonitis and died due to septic shock. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: We identified 49 case reports and 10 case series describing 17 gynecologic (cervical cancer, n = 2; carcinosarcoma of the uterus, n = 1; benign gynecologic condition, n = 14) and 76 obstetric patients (cesarean section, n = 66; OS during pregnancy or after vaginal delivery, n = 10). Outcome data were available for 59 patients. First-line treatment was conservative in 22/59 (37%) cases, laparotomy with decompression or colon resection was performed in 20/59 (34%) cases, endoscopic decompression in 12/59 (20%) cases, and i.v. neostigmine in 4/59 (7%) cases. Resolution was achieved in 22/59 (37%) of patients. The most common second-line treatment was right hemicolectomy. Adverse events grade 3 and 4 were observed in 8/59 and 31/59 patients (together 66%), respectively, mortality was 3/59 (5%). CONCLUSION: OS is a rare postoperative complication of gynecologic and obstetric patients with a good prognosis, but a high morbidity. Pregnancy seems to be a predisposing factor for OS. Conservative treatment is a successful first-line approach.

Chronic ectopic pregnancy: case report and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Chronic ectopic pregnancy (CEP) is a variant of ectopic pregnancy (EP) characterized by low or absent serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels, resistance to methotrexate (MTX), and an adnexal mass with fibrosis, necrosis, and blood clots due to repeated and gradual fallopian tube wall disintegration. CEP may complicate the course of patients with EP and is difficult to diagnose. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a 36-year-old woman with EP, low serum hCG levels, a small echogenic adnexal mass, and resistance to MTX is presented. Salpingectomy was performed and histology demonstrated CEP with fibrosis, necrosis, and a hematocele within degenerated chorionic villi. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: In a database search, 19 case reports, 3 case-control studies, and 3 case series describing 399 patients with CEP were identified. Serum hCG was negative in 40/124 cases (32%) with reported levels of serum hCG. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (284/399 [71%]), followed by irregular vaginal bleeding (219/399 [55%]), and fever (20/399 [5%]). 73/399 (18%) women were asymptomatic. An adnexal mass was seen in 144/298 (48%) cases with perioperative ultrasound examination and with a mean largest diameter of 6.8 cm. Data on treatment modalities and outcomes were available for 297 women. Of these, 89% underwent surgery as first-line therapy. Laparoscopy was performed in most cases. MTX was the first-line therapy in a minority of cases. Complete resolution was achieved by first-line therapy in 287/297 (97%) cases. Adverse events were reported in 218 patients with CEP. Among those, adverse events ≥ grade 3 were seen in 186/218 (85%) cases. There was no case of treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION: CEP is a variant of EP with low or absent trophoblast activity. A prolonged clinical course is typical and surgery is the mainstay of treatment.

What defines a good website of a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology? A user survey.

PURPOSE: The Internet has become a widely used source of healthcare information. Many Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology use their websites for public relations purposes. It is, however, unclear, what relevant stakeholders such as patients, relatives of patients, physicians, and medical students expect of an Obstetrics and Gynecology Department's website. Therefore, we evaluated the opinions and expectations of the various stakeholders using a structured questionnaire. METHODS: We asked gynecologic patients, obstetric patients, relatives of patients, medical students, and physicians to fill in an anonymous questionnaire consisting of general facts about the informant, one open-ended question on expectations and wishes regarding the website, and 28 rating scale questions (7-step visual analog scale ranging from, not important' to, very important') covering the topics "website navigation" (4 questions), "first contact" (3 questions), "clinic processes" (7 questions), "facts and figures about the Department" (4 questions), "visual impressions" (5 questions), and "obstetrics-specific items" (5 questions). Questionnaires for physicians included four additional questions about the value of Department websites as an information tool for themselves and their patients. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. RESULTS: 1458 questionnaires were analyzed (gynecologic patients, n = 615 [42%]; obstetric patients, n = 479 [33%]; relatives of patients, n = 77 [5%]; medical students n = 238 [16%]; physicians, n = 41 [3%]). The number of circulated questionnaires was not recorded and thus, the response rate is unknown. 1304 (89%) respondents used the Internet as a regular source of health care information, 642 (44%) had previously searched an Obstetrics and Gynecology Department website. All respondents rated contact data and information about processes in the clinic highest; whereas, other issues such as medical facts, visual impressions, and website design issues were significantly less important. Pregnant women rated contact information and obstetric facts highest. 90% of physicians regularly used Department websites for patient referrals and rated contact information and medical team details most important. CONCLUSIONS: When designing a website of an Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, contact information and information about processes in the clinic should be displayed most prominently and be easily accessible. Subsections specifically targeted at obstetric patients and physicians should be provided.

Calprotectin in pregnancy and pregnancy-associated diseases: a systematic review and prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Calprotectin, a marker of acute and chronic inflammation, may play a role in pregnancy-associated disorders. We aimed to summarize available clinical data on calprotectin in pregnancy and to establish normal values of calprotectin during the course of pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify experimental and clinical evidence assessing the role of calprotectin in pregnancy. In addition, we performed a prospective cohort study assessing serum and urine calprotectin throughout pregnancy. RESULTS: We identified 17 studies investigating 1638 pregnant women, 151 newborns, and 99 non-pregnant controls, measuring calprotectin in different compartments. Calprotectin was present in meconium and elevated in fecal samples of pregnant women with active inflammatory bowel disease. In women with pregnancy-induced hypertension, mild and severe preeclampsia (PE), calprotectin was significantly elevated in maternal plasma and serum, but not in fetal serum, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord blood. For the cohort study, we recruited 196 pregnant women. PE and concomitant renal disease were present in 6/196 (3%) and 11/196 (5.6%) of women, respectively. Throughout pregnancy, median serum and urine levels of calprotectin largely exceed reported concentrations of the healthy non-pregnant population, but showed no significant variations between trimesters 1-3 and post-partum. Calprotectin in serum was correlated with systolic blood pressure and in urine with leukocytes and total protein. No significant differences were found in subgroup analyses of smokers vs. non-smokers, PE vs. none, and renal disease (kidney stones, reflux) vs. none. CONCLUSION: Calprotectin concentrations in amnion fluid and stools serve as potential indicators of inflammatory states during pregnancy. Urinary calprotectin concentrations are continuously high during pregnancy and show no significant variations between trimesters 1-3 and post-partum.

Radiogenic angiosarcoma of the breast: case report and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Radiogenic angiosarcoma of the breast (RASB) is a rare late sequela of local irradiation of the breast or chest wall after breast cancer. The prognosis of women with RASB is poor and there is no standardized therapy for this type of malignancy. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 54 year old woman with RASB (poorly differentiated angiosarcoma of the left breast; pT1, pNX, M0, L0, V0) and a history of invasive-ductal cancer of the left breast (pT1b, G2, pN0, ER positive, PR positive, HER-2/neu negative) treated in July 2012 with breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy with 6 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, adjuvant irradiation of the left breast with 50 Gray, and adjuvant endocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor. In August 2016, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed to remove a tumor of the left ovary, which was diagnosed as breast cancer recurrence. At the same time, a small, purple skin lesion of 1.2 cm in diameter was noted in the inner upper quadrant of the right breast. RASB was diagnosed by punch biopsy and the tumor was excised with clear margins. Imaging studies showed no evidence of further metastases. A systemic chemotherapy with 6 cycles of liposomal doxorubicin was initiated. Five months later, a local recurrence of RASB was diagnosed and mastectomy was performed. Six months later, the patient is alive with no evidence of disease. Three hundred seven cases of RASB were identified. The pooled incidence rate of RASB was 1/3754 women. The most common treatment of RASB was mastectomy in 83% of cases. Adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy were rarely used with 6 and 4%, respectively, whereas in case of recurrence, chemotherapy was the mainstay of treatment, used in 58% of cases. Radiotherapy and repeated surgery were also common with 30 and 33% of cases, respectively. Overall, the prognosis of women with RASB was poor and the recurrence-free survival was short with a mean of 15.9 months. Mean overall survival was 27.4 months. CONCLUSION: RASB is a rare late complication of breast irradiation. The prognosis of women with RASB is poor. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized disease while systemic chemotherapy and re-irradiation are appropriate for women with disseminated or recurrent RASB.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare variant of cervical cancer. The prognosis of women with NECC is poor and there is no standardized therapy for this type of malignancy based on controlled trials. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trials describing the management and outcome of women with NECC. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred thirty-eight cases of NECC in 112 studies were identified. The pooled proportion of NECC among women with cervical cancer was 2303/163470 (1.41%). Small cell NECC, large cell NECC, and other histological subtypes were identified in 80.4, 12.0, and 7.6% of cases, respectively. Early and late stage disease presentation were evenly distributed with 1463 (50.6%) and 1428 (49.4%) cases, respectively. Tumors expressed synaptophysin (424/538 cases; 79%), neuron-specific enolase (196/285 cases; 69%), chromogranin (323/486 cases; 66%), and CD56 (162/267; 61%). The most common primary treatment was radical surgery combined with chemotherapy either as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, described in 42/48 studies. Radiotherapy-based primary treatment schemes in the form of radiotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or radiotherapy with concomitant or followed by chemotherapy were also commonly used (15/48 studies). There is no standard chemotherapy regimen for NECC, but cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide (EP) was the most commonly used treatment scheme (24/40 studies). Overall, the prognosis of women with NECC was poor with a mean recurrence-free survival of 16 months and a mean overall survival of 40 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents were reported as being active in three case reports. CONCLUSION: NECC is a rare variant of cervical cancer with a poor prognosis. Multimodality treatment with radical surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with or without radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for early stage disease while chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide or topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab is appropriate for women with locally advanced or recurrent NECC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be beneficial, but controlled evidence for their efficacy is lacking.

Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent malignant epithelioid mesothelioma (MM) after surgery and standard chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed have limited treatment options. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with recurrent MM undergoing Pressurized IntraPeritoneal/Thoracal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC/PITAC) with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2. Data were retrospectively collected in a prospective registry of patients undergoing PIPAC/PITAC. Study outcomes were microscopic tumor regression grade (TRG), survival and adverse events (v4.0 CTCAE). RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (m/f = 17/12) with MM with a mean age of 62.4 (range: 42 to 84) years were analyzed. A total of 74 PIPAC and 5 PITAC procedures were performed. The mean number of PIPAC applications was 2.5 (range: 0 to 10) per patient. Twenty patients (69%) had > 2 PIPAC procedure and were eligible for TRG analysis. TRG 1 to 4 was observed in 75% (15/20) of patients. Major regression (TRG 3) or complete regression (TRG 4) was observed in 20% and 10%, respectively. PIPAC induced significant tumor regression in 51.7% (15/29) of patients with a cumulative effect after repetitive PIPACs (PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #2: p = 0.001; PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #3: p = 0.001; PIPAC #1 vs. PIPAC #4: p = 0.001). Postoperative CTCAE grade 4 complications were observed in two patients (6.9%) who had cytoreductive surgery (CC2) and intraoperative PIPAC. One patient (3.4%) died due to postoperative kidney insufficiency. After a follow up of 14.4 (95% CI: 8.1 to 20.7) months after the last PIPAC/PITAC application, median overall survival was 26.6 (95% CI: 9.5 to 43.7) months (from the first application). CONCLUSION: After prior abdominal surgery and systemic chemotherapy, repetitive PIPAC applications are feasible and safe for patients with end-stage MM. Furthermore, PIPAC induces significant histological regression of malignant mesothelioma in the majority of patients. PITAC is feasible, but its safety and efficacy to control malignant pleural effusion remain unclear.

A phase I, single-arm, open-label, dose escalation study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a phase I, single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation trial to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin applied as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: We used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2, cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2 q 4 to 6 weeks for 3 cycles and subsequent dose escalation steps (20% increment per step) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Toxicity and clinical efficacy were monitored. The primary endpoint was the maximum-tolerable dose. Secondary endpoints included histologic tumor regression and serum parameters. RESULTS: 15 evaluable patients (3, 7, and 5 in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively) on average received 2.3 PIPAC cycles. No dose limiting toxicities were found. Adverse side effects were 1 grade 3 event (colon perforation) and 85 grade 1/2 events including fatigue (n = 19), abdominal pain (n = 18), nausea/vomiting (n = 14), sleep disorder (n = 8), diarrhea (n = 5), and fever (n = 2). Liver and renal toxicity was not observed in any of the 3 cohorts (AST 19.1 ±â€¯3.2, 25.8 ±â€¯6.5, and 22.1 ±â€¯4.5 IU/L, respectively; ALT 14.7 ±â€¯3.5, 18.5 ±â€¯5.6, and 23.3 ±â€¯13.0 IU/L, respectively; GGT 45.7 ±â€¯35.1, 25.2 ±â€¯10.3, and 43.9 ±â€¯26.4 IU/L, respectively; serum creatinine 1.06 ±â€¯0.23, 0.80 ±â€¯0.17, and 0.89 ±â€¯0.35 mg/dL, respectively). No systemic hematologic toxicity, alopecia, or neurotoxicity was noted. The maximum tolerable dose was not reached. Histologic tumor regression was observed in 7/11 (64%) patients who underwent ≥2 PIPAC cycles. CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin may be safely used at an intraperitoneal dose of 10.5 mg/m2 and 2.1 mg/m2, respectively. Systemic toxicity of this therapy is low.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is the standard surgical treatment for cervical dysplasia. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is advised to be performed under colposcopic guidance to minimize adverse pregnancy outcomes. To date, there is no evidence from randomized trials for this recommendation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the benefits of performing loop electrosurgical excision procedure under colposcopic guidance in women with cervical dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared loop electrosurgical excision procedure with loop electrosurgical excision procedure performed under direct colposcopic vision in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was resected cone mass; the secondary endpoints were margin status, fragmentation of the surgical specimen, procedure time, time to complete hemostasis, blood loss, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. A sample size of 87 per group (n = 174) was planned (with an assumed type I error of 0.05 and drop-out rate of 5%) to achieve 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in cone mass (with an assumed cone mass of 2.5 ± 1.6 g in the control group) using a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U). RESULTS: From October 2016 through December 2017, we randomized 182 women: 93 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure group and 89 in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure-direct colposcopic vision group. Women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure-direct colposcopic vision had significantly smaller cone specimens than those undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (weight: median 1.86 [interquartile range 1.20-2.72] vs median 2.37 [interquartile range 1.63-3.31] g, respectively, P = .006). Secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly between groups: resection margin status involved vs free margin: 12 (13%) vs 75 (82%) and 11 (12.4%) vs 75 (84.3%); fragmentation no vs yes: 85 (92.4%) vs 7 (7.6%) and 84 (94.4%) vs 5 (5.6%); procedure time: 190 (interquartile range 138-294) and 171 (interquartile range 133-290) seconds; time to complete hemostasis: 61 (interquartile range 31-108) and 51 (interquartile range 30-81) seconds; intraoperative blood loss (Δhemoglobin): 0.4 (interquartile range 0.2-1.0) and 0.5 (interquartile range 0.1-0.9); complication rate: 6 (6.5%) and 2 (2.2%). In a multivariate analysis, study group allocation (P = .021) and parity (P = .028), but not age, body mass index, type of transformation zone, and dysplasia degree independently influenced the amount of resected cone mass. CONCLUSION: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with intraoperative colposcopy leads to significantly smaller cone specimens without compromising margin status.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is not effective in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and only a minority of affected patients is eligible for cytoreductive surgery. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may provide a therapy alternative for these patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence on the safety and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with PC and provide clinical recommendations based on the available evidence. RESULTS: Fifty-eight reports were identified, categorized as experimental (18 reports), clinical (28 reports), and other articles (14 reports). Experimental studies demonstrated improved tissue penetration and peritoneal coverage. The 28 clinical studies reported on 3515 procedures in 1547 patients with PC of various primary tumors with 16 of these studies reporting on patients with ovarian cancer. Toxicity was manageable. Based on 1197 patients in 22 studies, adverse events CTCAE grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were observed in 537 (45%), 167 (14%), 83 (7%), 10 (0.8%), and 19 (1.6%) cases, respectively. In a pooled analysis, the objective tumor response rate was 69% and the mean overall survival duration was 13.7 months. No significant hepatic, renal, or hematologic toxicity was described. PIPAC maintained and/or improved quality of life, as reported in 10 studies with 396 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence from controlled trials (phase I and phase II) and retrospective cohort studies in > 1500 patients unequivocally demonstrates that PIPAC is feasible, safe, and effective. PIPAC maintains quality of life in patients with recurrent cancer and PC. PIPAC is as evidence-based as any other treatment in women with ovarian cancer and PC beyond the third line of systemic chemotherapy and can be recommended in this indication.

Influence of preadipocyte-conditioned medium on the proliferation and invasive potential of breast cancer cell lines in vitro.

PURPOSE: Autologous transplantation of adipose tissue into the breast is commonly performed in clinical practice, but its oncological safety has not been established. METHODS: We conducted an in vitro study to assess the influence of factors released by adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), from multiple source tissues and harvested using different techniques, on proliferation and invasiveness of two breast cancer cell lines. RESULTS: Fat specimens of 66 donors (57 female, 9 male) were collected and 44 ASC cultures were established. ASC conditioning of the medium (CM) increased the proliferation of MCF-7 cells (178.4 ± 62.8%; P < 0.001), whereas MDA-MB321 proliferation was decreased (87.3 ± 15.3%; P = 0.032). We observed increased cell migration (174.0 ± 62.8%; P = 0.002), but not cell invasion (1.28 ± 0.51; P = 0.14) in MDA-MB231. Migration and invasion of MCF-7 cells were not affected by exposure to ASC-CM. For MCF-7 cell migration, lower BMI (< 25 kg/m2) was associated with increased migration, both in univariate (P = 0.015) and multivariate (P = 0.039) analyses. Regarding the cytokine secretome, proliferation of MCF-7 was positively correlated with levels of eotaxin 1 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 in the CM, and inversely correlated with levels of interleukin 1ß and transforming growth factor ß-3. In case of MDA-MB231, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, angiogenin, eotaxin 1 and 3, neutrophil activating peptide 2, and neurotrophin-3 were positively correlated with proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that fat tissue transplantation increases proliferation and migration, but not invasion, of breast cancer cells. These findings are consistent with clinical data regarding the safety of autologous fat transplantation in breast cancer patients.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin as maintenance chemotherapy for unresectable ovarian cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary advanced, unresectable ovarian cancer (OC) is treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be an alternative local maintenance therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75 year old woman with laparoscopically and histologically confirmed unresectable OC was treated with 13 cycles of intraperitoneal cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 over 2 years using laparoscopic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Objective tumor response (tumor regression on histology, stable disease on repeated video-laparoscopy and peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was noted. No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) > grade 3 were observed. EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life measurements were stable throughout the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin applied as PIPAC may be an effective maintenance treatment in women with primary advanced, unresectable OC.

Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone Versus True Cone Biopsy Electrode Excision: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare two conization techniques, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), and true cone biopsy electrode excision (TCBEE) in women with cervical dysplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, we compared LLETZ and TCBEE in women undergoing surgical treatment of cervical dysplasia in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was resection margin status (RMS), secondary endpoints were fragmentation of the surgical specimen, resection volume, operation time, time to complete hemostasis, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgeon's preference, and patient's postoperative pain, estimated by an 11-level visual analog scale (nVAS11), and a 5-level pictogram. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two women were randomized. No difference in the primary outcome, resection margin status, was observed between LLETZ and TCBEE (involved margins: 12/91 [13%] vs 7/81 [9%], respectively; p = .4). However, fragmentation rate (1 vs >1 fragment: 85 [93%] and 6 [7%] for LLETZ vs 63 [78%] and 18 [22%] for TCBEE; p = .004) and surgeon preference (nVAS11: 1 [0-2] vs 3 [1-7]; p < .001) favored LLETZ. Postoperative pain, however, was lower after TCBEE (nVAS11: 1 [0-3] vs 0 [0-2]; p = .02). The secondary outcome parameters resection volume, operation time, time to complete hemostasis, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications were not different between the study groups. In a multivariate analysis, age, body mass index, and parity did not affect the primary and secondary outcome parameters. CONCLUSIONS: LLETZ and TCBEE are equally safe and efficacious procedures, but specimen fragmentation and surgeon preference favor loop excision.