RESUMO
We analyzed the usefulness of a semi-tethered field running test (STR) and the relationships between indices of anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity and running performance in 9 trained male sprinters (22.2 ± 2.9 yrs, 176 ± 1 cm, 68.0 ± 9.4 kg). STR involved an all out 120 m run attached to an apparatus that enabled power calculation from force and velocity measures. Subjects also carried out a cycloergometer Wingate Anaerobic Test (WT), an all out 300 m run and had accessed their maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) on a treadmill. Peak and mean powers attained in STR (1720 ± 221 and 1391 ± 201 W) were greater but significantly related (r = 0.82; P < 0.01) to those in the WT (808 ± 130 and 603 ± 87 W). In addition, power measures derived from the STR were stronger related to running performance compared to those from the WT (r = 0.81-0.94 vs. 0.68-0.84; P < 0.05). Relationships between MAOD and most power indices were only weak to moderate. These results support the usefulness of STR for specific power assessment in field running and suggest that anaerobic power and capacity are not related entities, irrespective of having been evaluated using similar or dissimilar exercise modes.