Improved survival of patients with colon cancer detected by screening colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Screening for colon cancer (CC) may not only reduce its occurrence but has also the potential to reduce the overall mortality. So far, there has been little evidence that detection of colon cancer by screening colonoscopy results in different survival rates compared to symptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical, histological, diagnostic, and survival data of 1016 consecutive patients with CC from a prospectively expanded single-institutional database were analyzed for diagnostic, treatment, and prognostic factors. Findings were then stratified according to detection by screening colonoscopy vs. patients who became symptomatic prior to further diagnostic work-up. RESULTS: 7.1 % of all patients were identified by screening colonoscopy for colon cancer. Screened patients were younger (68.2 vs. 64.8 years), had smaller T stage (p = 0.032), lower tumor stage (p = 0.009), and a tendency to less lymph node metastasis. Overall survival was superior in screened patients, and stage-specific survival showed a tendency to improved survival, which was not statistically significant. Furthermore, a higher percentage of screened patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (84.6 vs. 55.0 %, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Survival outcome and enrollment in a multimodal treatment was higher in screening-detected patients compared to patients diagnosed after the onset of clinical symptoms. Besides a potential occurrence of lead time bias, these findings strongly support the need for continued improvement of screening programs and the recruitment of more patients for colorectal cancer screening.

The impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: 40-50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of the disease. One third of these patients will additionally develop pulmonary metastases. METHODS: 137 consecutive patients with CRLM, were analyzed regarding survival data, clinical, histological data and treatment. Results were stratified according to the occurrence of pulmonary metastases and metastases resection. RESULTS: 39% of all patients with liver resection due to CRLM developed additional lung metastases. 44% of these patients underwent subsequent pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better five-year survival compared to patients not qualified for curative resection (5-year survival 71.2% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, the 5-year survival of these patients was even superior to all patients with CRLM, who did not develop pulmonary metastases (77.5% vs. 63.5%; p = 0.015). Patients, whose pulmonary metastases were not resected, were more likely to redevelop liver metastases (50.0% vs 78.6%; p = 0.034). However, the rate of distant metastases did not differ between both groups (54.5 vs.53.6; p = 0.945). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of colorectal lung metastases after curative liver resection does not impact patient survival if pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible. Those patients clearly benefit from repeated resections of the liver and the lung metastases.