Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies.

Many diseases and injuries can impair joint mobility. Normal reference values are needed to determine extent of impairment to assess and monitor joint motion. There is very little published data describing normal joint range of motion (ROM) for healthy men and women across a wide span of ages. We enrolled male and female subjects aged between 2 and 69 years who were free from conditions that could potentially limit joint mobility for the study. Nine licensed physical therapists used universal goniometers to determine passive joint motion bilaterally of elbow flexion, extension, supination and pronation, shoulder flexion, hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for male and female subjects in four age groups: 2-8, 9-19, 20-44 and 45-69 years. Joint ROM measurements were obtained on a total of 674 (53.6% female) healthy, normal subjects aged 2-69 years. Female subjects had greater joint mobility in all age groups in nearly all joints and the gender difference was most obvious in measures of ankle plantarflexion, elbow pronation and supination. Range of motion average values for all joints decreased with advancing age for both men and women and, in most cases, were significantly different than most commonly used normative values. Our study of ROM measurements taken by trained physical therapists on a large sample of healthy individuals revealed significant gender- and age-related variation that may be an important consideration in patient assessment.

The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability.

A Foot Function Index (FFI) was developed to measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales. Both total and sub-scale scores are produced. The FFI was examined for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity. A total of 87 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were used in the study. Test-retest reliability of the FFI total and sub-scale scores ranged from 0.87 to 0.69. Internal consistency ranged from 0.96 to 0.73. With the exception of two items, factor analysis supported the construct validity of the total index and the sub-scales. Strong correlation between the FFI total and sub-scale scores and clinical measures of foot pathology supported the criterion validity of the index. The FFI should prove useful for both clinical and research purposes.

Impacts of foot orthoses on pain and disability in rheumatoid arthritics.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently causes foot pain and swelling that affect ambulation. Pharmaceutical management of pain and disability is standard in clinical practice. The use of functional posted foot orthoses, as an adjunct to pharmaceutical treatment, is a promising treatment for managing foot pain and disability in RA. Its effectiveness, however, has not been rigorously evaluated. We performed a double-blind clinical trial using foot orthoses vs. placebo orthoses in the management of the rheumatoid arthritic foot, while subjects continued customary treatment. On the basis of findings of no effect on disability and pain measures, this study indicates no benefit of functional posted foot orthoses over placebos.

Reliability of physical performance measures in nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Investigation of the effects of exercise on frail, institutionalized individuals with dementia has been impeded by concerns about the reliability of physical performance measures when used in this population. METHODS: The physical performance of 33 institutionalized subjects with Alzheimer's disease was measured during both the morning and afternoon of day 1 by rater 1 and during both the morning and afternoon of day 2, one week later, by rater 1 and rater 2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to examine the inter- and intrarater reliability of "sit to stand," "25-foot walk," and "the distance walked in 6 minutes" and walking speed over 25 feet and for 6 minutes. An analysis of variance was performed to determine the components of variance for each test. RESULTS: ICCs for "distance walked in 6 minutes" ranged from .80 to .99 with 77% of the variance explained by inter-subject difference. The ICCs for "time to walk 25 feet" ranged from .57 to .97 with 25% of the variance explained by inter-subject differences. In contrast, the "sit to stand" measure produced ICCs ranging from -.07 to .85 with only 7% of the variance explained by inter-subject differences in this impaired population. CONCLUSION: Our results support the contention that some physical performance measures can be used to test individuals in the later stages of Alzheimer's disease given appropriate modification. Although subjects with Alzheimer's disease may have difficulty following commands and/or require physical assistance, this does not prohibit the reliable assessment of physical performance if measurements are made over longer (6-minute walk) rather than shorter periods (25-foot walk).

Development of a shoulder pain and disability index.

A shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) was developed to measure the pain and disability associated with shoulder pathology. The SPADI is a self-administered index consisting of 13 items divided into two subscales: pain and disability. Thirty-seven male patients with shoulder pain were used in a study to examine the measurement characteristics of the SPADI. Test-retest reliability of the SPADI total and subscale scores ranged from 0.6377 to 0.6552. Internal consistency ranged from 0.8604 to 0.9507. SPADI total and subscale scores were highly negatively correlated with shoulder range of motion (ROM) supporting the criterion validity of the index. Principal components factor analysis with and without varimax rotation supported the construct validity of the total SPADI and its subscales. High negative correlations between changes in SPADI scores and changes in shoulder ROM indicated the SPADI detected changes in clinical status over short time intervals. The SPADI should prove useful for both clinical and research purposes.

Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age.

Abnormal joint mobility is an important factor in movement dysfunction and physical disability. Because the decision to treat impaired joint mobility in an older individual may be influenced by assumptions concerning normal range of motion (ROM) at older ages, it is important to establish population-based normative values for hip and knee ROM by age, race, and sex. This study used data from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 1), which involved a national probability sample of persons drawn from the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. Goniometric measurements of hip and knee active range of motion (AROM) were obtained from a subset of the sample consisting of 1,892 subjects. This analysis was limited to the 1,313 white and 370 black subjects. Univariate statistics, weighted by the probability of selection into the sample, were calculated for 12 sex-race-age-group-specific categories. These normal AROM values for the hip and knee calculated from this population based sample were found to differ from estimates found in textbooks by as much as 18 degrees. With one exception, normal values for all motions were lower in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. The differences in mean AROM were generally small, ranging from 3 to 5 degrees. Only in the case of hip extension did the difference in mean AROM between the youngest and the oldest age groups constitute a decline of more than 20% of the arc of motion. With the possible exception of hip extension, this study supports the conclusion that, at least to age 74 years, any substantial loss of joint mobility should be viewed as abnormal and not attributable to aging and therefore should be treated much as it would be in a younger individual.

Interrater reliability of a clinical scale of rigidity.

The purposes of this study were 1) to describe a clinical scale of rigidity and testing procedure for use in patients with Parkinson's disease and 2) to examine the scale's interrater reliability. Twenty subjects (3 women, 17 men; mean age = 64 years, s = 16.3) participated in the study. Criteria for participation were 1) diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, 2) physician-documented rigidity, 3) ability to follow one-step verbal directions, and 4) ability to attain at least 75% of the standard passive-range-of-motion measurements of the elbow, forearm, and wrist of the tested upper extremity. Each of two raters used a standardized set of instructions and test procedures. The degree of rigidity was assessed using a four-point scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). The observed agreement between raters was 16 out of 20 trials. A Cohen's weighted Kappa was used to analyze the data (Kw = .636, p = .20). Factors were identified that may have contributed to the discrepancy between agreement and the agreement beyond chance.

Reliability and validity of the Acute Care Index of Function for patients with neurologic impairment.

The Acute Care Index of Function (ACIF), developed to standardize the assessment of functional status in patients with acute neurologic deficits, was tested for interrater reliability and concurrent validity. Interrater reliability was tested on 91 patients in a five-week study. After a two-week training period, six physical therapists were paired so that each therapist was paired with each other therapist for one week. All patients were rated weekly with the ACIF by a pair of physical therapists. A total of 166 assessments were conducted. Concurrent validity was tested using descriptions of function of 10 hypothetical patients. Each patient description was assigned a score based on the ACIF. Ten experienced therapists were then asked to rank order the functional status of each patient based on the patient's description. The average of the physical therapists' rankings was correlated with the ranking determined with the ACIF scores. Reliability data were analyzed using Cohen's weighted Kappa. The weighted Kappa values ranged from .60 to .98. Validity data were analyzed with the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (rs = .81, p less than .01). The results of this study indicate that the ACIF is reliable between raters and valid in its ability to rank order functional status for patients with acute neurologic deficits.

Development of an Acute Care Index of Functional status for patients with neurologic impairment.

The Acute Care Index of Function (ACIF) was developed to standardize the functional status assessment of patients with acute neurologic impairment. The ACIF was used to collect patient data for a six-month period. A scoring system was then developed for the ACIF using data from 75 randomly selected patients in three discharge categories: 1) home (n = 25), 2) nursing home (n = 25), and 3) rehabilitation center (n = 25). After a scoring system was established, the ACIF was examined to determine whether it met the design criteria. The average amount of time required to administer the ACIF was 12 minutes, demonstrating feasibility for use in acute care. Data from 28 patients with a cerebrovascular accident from the discharge categories of nursing home and rehabilitation center demonstrated that the ACIF was precise enough to detect functional status changes in patients with an acute neurologic impairment. Data from the original 75 patients were examined to determine the ability of the ACIF to separate patients by score into groups consistent with their discharge placement. A 1 x 3 analysis of variance and a Scheffé post hoc analysis demonstrated that the mean ACIF scores of patients in the three discharge categories were significantly different.

Relationship between duration of therapy services in a comprehensive rehabilitation program and mobility at discharge in patients with orthopedic problems.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between duration of physical therapy and occupational therapy and mobility at the time of discharge from a comprehensive rehabilitation program in a group of patients with orthopedic diagnoses. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 116 consecutive patients with orthopedic diagnoses (mean age=72.6 years, SD=12.0, range=21-99) who were admitted to a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Uniform Data Set, social service records, and quality assurance records to provide demographic and medical information. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) provided information regarding mobility at admission and discharge. The duration of physical therapy and occupational therapy was measured in hours. RESULTS: Subjects received an average of 40.8 hours of therapy and showed an average change in FIM mobility subscale scores of 24.5. Multiple linear regression was used to demonstrate that duration of therapy was a predictor of FIM score at the time of discharge (partial correlation=.069) after controlling for length of stay, number of diagnoses, FIM cognitive subscale score at admission, and FIM mobility subscale score at admission. Duration of therapy accounted for 6.9% of the variance in the model. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This study indicates that the amount of physical therapy and occupational therapy that patients with orthopedic diagnoses receive during enrollment in an inpatient comprehensive rehabilitation program is related to the FIM mobility subscale score at the time of discharge. The authors suggest that increasing the hours of therapeutic intervention that a patient receives in inpatient rehabilitation could improve functional outcomes at discharge.

The sensitivity and specificity of pain response to activity and position in categorizing patients with low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to develop screening tests for four low back pain (LBP) diagnoses based on patient reports concerning the severity of pain in various positions and during activities and then to examine the accuracy of these tests in assigning subjects to one of four LBP diagnostic categories. The accuracy of screening tests is determined by calculating sensitivity and specificity and is well established in epidemiology. SUBJECTS: One hundred six consecutive patients who either were being treated for LBP for the first time or had not received medical care for LBP at the participating clinics within the 12 months prior to the study were recruited. METHODS: Subjects completed a Pain Response to Activity and Position Questionnaire at the time of their initial clinic visit. The diagnosis of LBP was obtained from the medical record after at least 1 month of follow-up and the completion of diagnostic testing. Data analysis yielded symptom clusters that were used to produce screening tests for each of the four categories of LBP. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive power of the screening tests were (1) benign back disease: .57,.71,.40, and .82, (2) disk disease: .65,.49,.35, and .77, (3) spinal stenosis: .52, .74, .36, and .85, and (4) disk disease with spinal stenosis: .81, .54, .24, and .94. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Although more than half of the subjects with a particular LBP diagnosis tested positive for that diagnosis, approximately two thirds of the subjects who tested positive for each of the diagnoses actually had another diagnosis. Negative tests may be more useful in that between 77% and 94% of the subjects without the diagnosis tested negative. Although patient reports of LBP response to position and activity are not sufficient for diagnosis, they may be useful in ruling out a particular diagnosis.

The relationship between duration of physical therapy services in the acute care setting and change in functional status in patients with lower-extremity orthopedic problems.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between the duration of physical therapy and functional status at discharge. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 173 inpatients, with a mean age of 67.9 years (SD = 20.5, range = 18-101), referred to physical therapy with lower-extremity orthopedic problems. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, medical and physical therapy quality assurance records were used. Functional status, at initiation of and discharge from physical therapy, was measured using the Acute Care Index of Function (ACIF). The ACIF scores, which ranged from 0 to 100, were obtained from quality assurance records. The duration of physical therapy was the number of minutes of physical therapy billed to each patient, as determined from billing records. RESULTS: Subjects received an average of 238.5 minutes of physical therapy (SD = 153.6, range = 15-1,110). Function improved an average of 15.4 points (SD = 17.0, range = -27.4 to 64.9), and the duration of physical therapy was an important predictor of functional status at discharge after controlling for age, length of hospitalization, number of diagnoses, and initial functional status. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence that the amount of physical therapy that patients with some types of orthopedic problems receive is directly related to the functional improvement that occurs during hospitalization in an acute care setting.

A clinician's guide to specification and sampling.

This article will describe and discuss the implications of various steps in the process of selecting a sample for a research study and should assist clinicians in deciding whether and how to apply specific research findings to clinical care.

The use of patient symptoms to screen for serious back problems.

Even when a patient is referred by a physician, the physical therapist must remain alert to the possibility that the patient may require medical care outside the realm of physical therapy. Physical therapists must be able to screen low back pain patients to identify those who have serious low back problems which require additional diagnostic evaluation and treatment by a physician. It is important for physical therapists to know which symptoms and signs or combination of symptoms and signs best indicate the likelihood of a serious problem. The purpose of this study was to test the sensitivity and specificity of low back pain symptoms in distinguishing individuals with a benign low back problem from those requiring surgical or medical intervention. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively from a standardized low back pain questionnaire located in the medical records of 174 low back pain patients. Patients were classified as having a benign low back problem (N = 41) or a serious low back problem (N = 133) based on surgical findings or long term follow-up. Some individual symptoms had high specificity, but none had high sensitivity. To improve sensitivity while attempting to maintain moderate specificity, a number of symptoms were considered in parallel. The highest combination of sensitivity (.87) and specificity (.50) was obtained by combining in parallel the symptoms of unable to sleep, awakened and unable to fall back to sleep, medication required to sleep, and pain worsened by walking.

Test-retest reliability of patient reports of low back pain.

Low back pain is, in large part, a subjective illness. Clinicians must use patient descriptions of the severity and location of low back pain and how it responds to various activities and positions to make diagnostic and treatment decisions. Therefore, it is important to understand how reliably patients describe these aspects of low back pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of a visual analogue scale measure of pain intensity, a pain drawing measure of pain location, and the pain response to activity and position questionnaire. Fifty-three subjects (28 men and 25 women) with a mean age of 54.2 years were recruited from an outpatient orthopaedic clinic. They completed the visual analogue scale, pain drawing, and pain response to activity and position questionnaire before and again immediately after seeing their physician. Thirty-three subjects also completed the visual analogue scale and pain drawing measure that evening and the next morning. Test-retest reliability of the visual analogue scale and pain drawing measure was examined using an intraclass correlation coefficient. Reliability of each item on the pain response to activity and position questionnaire was examined by calculating an unweighted Cohen's kappa. Overall, the three pain measures demonstrated fair to good test-retest reliability: 1) visual analogue scale = .66-.93, 2) pain drawing = .58-.94, and 3) pain response to activity and position questionnaire = .46-.89. The results of this study suggest that, although there is some variability in how consistently patients report various aspects of low back pain, the reliability of these pain measures is sufficient to permit their use in making clinical decisions and measuring treatment outcomes.

Can foot orthoses prevent hallux valgus deformity in rheumatoid arthritis? A randomized clinical trial.

Hallux valgus deformity is the most commonly observed forefoot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This 5-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial compared treatment orthoses with placebo orthoses for the prevention of hallux valgus deformity in the rheumatoid arthritic foot.One hundred and two subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis and with foot pain and minimal radiographic changes of the feet participated in the study. They were recruited from five arthritis clinics in the Chicago metropolitan area that are affiliated with or are teaching clinics of area medical schools. Patients were followed for 3 years.Eighty-one subjects completed the study. In a logistic regression analysis, the treatment group was 73% less likely to develop hallux valgus deformity compared with the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.078, 0.916 p = .04). These findings suggest that foot orthoses can prevent or slow the progression of hallux valgus deformity.

EMG activity of medial and lateral hamstrings at three positions of tibial rotation during low-force isometric knee flexion contractions.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine how the position of tibial rotation effects the EMG activity of the medial and lateral hamstrings during low-force isometric knee flexion contractions. Forty-five subjects (ages 18-35) with no history of lower extremity injury or disease volunteered for this study. While lying prone, and with surface EMG electrodes secured to the bellies of their right medial (semitendinous and semimembranosus) and lateral (long head of the biceps femoris) hamstring muscles, each subject held the knee in 45° of flexion for 8 s against 5% of their body weight. This was performed three times in each of the positions of neutral tibial rotation, external tibial rotation, and internal tibial rotation. The root-mean-square (RMS) of the EMG activity from these muscles was determined for each of the contractions. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the RMS values of the two muscle groups in the three positions. The average RMS values (in microvolts [mV]) obtained were (means and standard deviation): medial hamstrings in external rotation: 50.74 ± 23.11; in neutral: 65.57 ± 25.35; in internal rotation: 70.73 ± 31.86; lateral hamstrings in external rotation: 66.08 ± 46.99; in neutral: 46.18 ± 39.34; in internal rotation: 27.68 ± 17.86. A statistically significant interaction was found between tibial rotation and hamstring muscle (p < 0.0001). These results are consistent with the presumed function of these muscles in that EMG activity in the medial hamstrings increased when the tibia was rotated internally, whereas the lateral hamstring EMG activity increased when the tibia was rotated externally.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) from English into German, and to test the reliability and validity of the German version. METHODS: Cross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI was performed according to international guidelines. One hundred and eighteen patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty, on average 4 yr previously, completed a questionnaire booklet containing the German SPADI, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire for the shoulder to assess SPADI's construct validity. One week later, they completed the SPADI again to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The six-step cross-cultural adaptation procedure revealed no major problems with the content or language. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the individual items of the SPADI were between 0.68 and 0.89, and that for the SPADI total score was 0.94. The SPADI total score showed a correlation of 0.61-0.69 with the SF-36 physical scales, of 0.88 with the DASH and of 0.92 with the ASES. CONCLUSIONS: The German SPADI is a practicable, reliable and valid instrument, and can be recommended for the self-assessment of shoulder pain and function.

Effect of a combined walking and conversation intervention on functional mobility of nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease.

Assisted walking and walking combined with conversation were compared to a conversation-only intervention in nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease. Sixty-five subjects randomly assigned to treatment group were tested at baseline and end of treatment. Subjects' mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 10.83; mean age was 87. Treatment was given for 30 minutes three times a week for 16 weeks. Subjects in the assisted walking group declined 20.9% in functional mobility; the conversation group declined 18.8%. The combined walking and conversation treatment group declined only 2.5%. These differences in outcome were significant and appear to have been affected by differences in treatment fidelity. Subjects in the conversation treatment group completed 90% of intended treatment compared with 75% in the combined group and only 57% in the assisted walking group. Failure to treat was due to subject refusal and physical illness. The conversation component of the combined walking and conversation treatment intervention appears to have improved compliance with the intervention, thereby improving treatment outcome. Results indicate that assisted walking with conversation can contribute to maintenance of functional mobility in institutionalized populations with Alzheimer disease. Staff assigned to this task should be prepared to use effective communication strategies to gain acceptance of the intervention.