A salamander that chews using complex, three-dimensional mandible movements.

Most non-mammal tetrapods have a hinge-like jaw operation restricted to vertical opening and closing movements. Many mammal jaw joints, by contrast, operate in more complex, three-dimensional (3D) ways, involving not only vertical but also propalinal (rostro-caudal) and transverse (lateral) movements. Data on intraoral food processing in lissamphibians and sauropsids has prompted a generally accepted view that these groups mostly swallow food unreduced, and that in those cases where lissamphibians and sauropsids chew, they mostly use simple vertical jaw movements for food processing. The exception to this generally accepted view is the occurrence of some propalinal chewing in sauropsids. We combined 3D kinematics and morphological analyses from biplanar high-speed video fluoroscopy and micro-computed tomography to determine how the paedomorphic salamander Siren intermedia treats captured food. We discovered not only that S. intermedia uses intraoral food processing but also that the elaborated morphology of its jaw joint facilitates mandibular motions in all three planes, resulting in complex 3D chewing. Thus, our data challenge the commonly held view that complex 3D chewing movements are exclusive to mammals, by suggesting that such mechanisms might have evolved early in the tetrapod evolution.

Seroprevalence of infectious laryngotracheitis disease in backyard chickens in villages of Ada'a district, Oromia, Ethiopia: first report.

As per the report from the OIE in 2005, infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) has not been yet reported in Ethiopia. Hence, considering the evident clinical signs on-field associated with the disease, it felt that there is a need to identify the disease and to protect the chicken population. The study was, therefore, aimed at identifying the seroprevalence of ILT virus from the samples collected from chickens in backyard system, so as to notify its prevalence and setup recommendations for further research in the future. Consequently, cross-sectional study was conducted in eleven purposefully selected peasant associations (PA) of Ada'a district from January to May 2019 to determine ILT in backyard chickens. A total number of 426 sera sample of backyard chickens were randomly collected from 11 PA and each sera was exposed to an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA), at the National Animal Health Diagnostic and Investigation Center, Ethiopia. Out of 426 samples, 233 (54.7%) samples were found positive for ILT virus-specific antibody. The highest prevalence was recorded in Wajitu (83.3%), whereas the least was in Giche (40.7%) PA. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) among seroprevalence and study PA. The result of this study revealed that a high prevalence of ILT virus is circulating among backyard chickens in the selected PA of Ada'a district, which could significantly affect the poultry sector. Thus, further studies on the circulating strains and the epidemiology of the disease should be carried using a molecular diagnostic test.

Do salamanders chew? An X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology analysis of ambystomatid intraoral feeding behaviours.

Chewing is widespread across vertebrates, including mammals, lepidosaurs, and ray-finned and cartilaginous fishes, yet common wisdom about one group-amphibians-is that they swallow food whole, without processing. Earlier salamander studies lacked analyses of internal kinematics of the tongue, analyses of muscle function, and sampled few individuals, which may have caused erroneous conclusions. Specifically, without tongue and food kinematics, intraoral behaviours are difficult to disambiguate. We hypothesized that ambystomatid salamanders use diverse intraoral behaviours, including chewing, and tested this hypothesis with biplanar videofluoroscopy, X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology, and fluoromicrometry. We generated musculoskeletal kinematic profiles for intraoral behaviours in Axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum), including three-dimensional skeletal kinematics associated with feeding, for gape, cranial and pectoral girdle rotations, and tongue translations. We also measured muscle fibre and muscle-tendon unit strains for six muscles involved in generating skull, jaw and tongue kinematics (adductor mandibulae, depressor mandibulae, geniohyoid, sternohyoid, epaxialis and hypaxialis). A principal component analysis recovered statistically significant differences between behaviour cycles, classified based on food movements as either chewing or transport. Thus, our data suggest that ambystomatid salamanders use a previously unrecognized diversity of intraoral behaviours, including chewing. Combined with existing knowledge, our data suggest that chewing is a basal trait for tetrapods and jaw-bearing vertebrates. This article is part of the theme issue 'Food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals'.

Rhythmic chew cycles with distinct fast and slow phases are ancestral to gnathostomes.

Intra-oral food processing, including chewing, is important for safe swallowing and efficient nutrient assimilation across tetrapods. Gape cycles in tetrapod chewing consist of four phases (fast open and -close, and slow open and -close), with processing mainly occurring during slow close. Basal aquatic-feeding vertebrates also process food intraorally, but whether their chew cycles are partitioned into distinct phases, and how rhythmic their chewing is, remains unknown. Here, we show that chew cycles from sharks to salamanders are as rhythmic as those of mammals, and consist of at least three, and often four phases, with phase distinction occasionally lacking during jaw opening. In fishes and aquatic-feeding salamanders, fast open has the most variable duration, more closely resembling mammals than basal amniotes (lepidosaurs). Across ontogenetically or behaviourally mediated terrestrialization, salamanders show a distinct pattern of the second closing phase (near-contact) being faster than the first, with no clear pattern in partitioning of variability across phases. Our results suggest that distinct fast and slow chew cycle phases are ancestral for jawed vertebrates, followed by a complicated evolutionary history of cycle phase durations and jaw velocities across fishes, basal tetrapods and mammals. These results raise new questions about the mechanical and sensorimotor underpinnings of vertebrate food processing. This article is part of the theme issue 'Food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals'.