Real-world persistence of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic and episodic migraine: Retrospective real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the real-world treatment persistence (defined as the continuation of medication for the prescribed treatment duration), demographics and clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns for patients prescribed erenumab for migraine prevention in Canada. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of prophylactic migraine treatments is often undermined by poor treatment persistence. In clinical trials, erenumab has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability as a preventive treatment, but less is known about the longer term treatment persistence with erenumab. METHODS: This is a real-world retrospective cohort study where a descriptive analysis of secondary patient data was conducted. Enrollment and prescription data were extracted from a patient support program for a cohort of patients prescribed erenumab in Canada between September 2018 and December 2019 and analyzed for persistence, baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns. Descriptive analyses and unadjusted Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to summarize the persistence and dose escalation/de-escalation at different timepoints. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 14,282 patients. Median patient age was 47 years, 11,852 (83.0%) of patients were female, and 9443 (66.1%) had chronic migraine at treatment initiation. Based on KM methods, 71.0% of patients overall were persistent to erenumab 360 days after treatment initiation. Within 360 days of treatment initiation, it is estimated that 59.3% (KM-derived) of patients who initiated erenumab at 70 mg escalated to 140 mg, and 4.4% (KM-derived) of patients who initiated at 140 mg de-escalated to 70 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients prescribed erenumab remained persistent for at least a year after treatment initiation, and most patients initiated or escalated to a 140 mg dose. These results suggest that erenumab is well tolerated, and its uptake as a new class of prophylactic treatment for migraine in real-world clinical practice is not likely to be undermined by poor persistence when coverage for erenumab is easily available.

A real-world, observational study of erenumab for migraine prevention in Canadian patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess real-world effectiveness, safety, and usage of erenumab in Canadian patients with episodic and chronic migraine with prior ineffective prophylactic treatments. BACKGROUND: In randomized controlled trials, erenumab demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention in patients with ≤4 prior ineffective prophylactic migraine therapies. The "Migraine prevention with AimoviG: Informative Canadian real-world study" (MAGIC) assessed real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Canadian patients with migraine. METHODS: MAGIC was a prospective open-label, observational study conducted in Canadian patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) with two to six categories of prior ineffective prophylactic therapies. Participants were administered 70 mg or 140 mg erenumab monthly based on physician's assessment. Migraine attacks were self-assessed using an electronic diary and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) after the 3-month treatment period. RESULTS: Among the 95 participants who mostly experienced two (54.7%) or three (32.6%) prior categories of ineffective prophylactic therapies and who initiated erenumab, treatment was generally safe and well tolerated; 89/95 (93.7%) participants initiated treatment with 140 mg erenumab. At week 12, 32/95 (33.7%) participants including 17/64 (26.6%) CM and 15/32 (48.4%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD while 30/86 (34.9%) participants including 19/55 (34.5%) CM and 11/31 (35.5%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD at week 24. Through patient-reported outcome questionnaires, 62/95 (65.3%) and 45/86 (52.3%) participants reported improvement of their condition at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Physicians observed improvement in the condition of 78/95 (82.1%) and 67/86 (77.9%) participants at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients with EM and CM achieved ≥50% MMD reduction after 3 months of erenumab treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness, safety, and usage for migraine prevention in adult Canadian patients with multiple prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.

The Burden of Illness of Migraine in Canada: New Insights on Humanistic and Economic Cost.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the burden of illness of migraine in Canada. The primary objective was to estimate the annual direct medical resource use and associated costs in migraine patients who failed at least two prophylactic therapies for migraine. METHODS: Adults with at least four migraine days per month and who had failed at least two prophylactic migraine therapies were included. Participation in a clinical trial within 12 months of enrollment was the sole exclusionary criterion. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, migraine-related treatment and medical history, and direct medical resource utilization were collected through a retrospective medical chart review. Data on patient characteristics, lifestyle factors, treatments, medical resource utilization, out-of-pocket expenses, and indirect costs were collected through a cross-sectional patient survey. The patient survey also included validated patient-reported outcome instruments to assess migraine impact on quality of life and work productivity loss. RESULTS: In total, 287 migraine patients were included. The mean time since migraine diagnosis was 14.3 years and patients experienced a mean of 14.1 migraine days per month. The total estimated annual cost of chronic migraine (CM) was $25,669 per patient, while the annual total costs for high-frequency episodic and low-frequency episodic migraine (EM) were estimated to be $24,885 and $15,651, respectively. CONCLUSION: Migraine is associated with moderate to severe disability. This results in substantial economic burden, directly from healthcare costs such as prescription medications and indirectly through lost work productivity. We also observed that patients with high-frequency EM experience significant burden, similar to that observed for patients with CM.

Identification and characterization of an activating F229V substitution in the V2 vasopressin receptor in an infant with NSIAD.

Gain-of-function mutations in the gene encoding the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) cause nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. To date, reported mutations lead to the substitution of arginine 137 by either a cysteine or leucine (R137C/L). Here, we describe a 3-month-old hyponatremic infant found to have a phenylalanine 229 to valine (F229V) substitution in V2R. Characterization of this substitution in vitro revealed that it leads to high constitutive activity of the receptor, compatible with spontaneous antidiuresis. In contrast to R137C/L mutant receptors, F229V receptors do not undergo spontaneous desensitization, which results in sustained, high basal activity. Notably, the V2R-selective inverse agonists tolvaptan and satavaptan completely silenced the constitutive signaling activity of the F229V mutant receptor, indicating that this substitution does not lock the receptor in an irreversible active state. Thus, inverse agonists might prove to be effective therapies for treating patients with this or other spontaneously activating mutations that do not lock the V2R in its active state. These results emphasize the importance of genetic testing and the functional characterization of mutant receptors for patients with nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis because the results might inform treatment decisions.

Vasopressin type 2 receptor V88M mutation: molecular basis of partial and complete nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mutations in the type 2 vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR2) underlie X-linked recessive nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI). Here, we report on a family with a mutation in AVPR2, c.262G>A (p.V88M). This recurrently identified mutation was previously shown to abolish AVPR2 function, yet in some affected members, urine osmolalities of up to 570 mosm/kg were observed. We detail the variable clinical phenotype and investigate its molecular basis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical data and in vitro assessment of wild-type and V88M-mutant receptors. RESULTS: Clinical data were available on 6 patients. Four of these demonstrated a substantial increase in urinary concentration after 1-desamino[8-D-arginine] vasopressin, consistent with partial NDI, while 2 did not respond. In vitro analysis revealed a reduced cell surface expression and decreased binding affinity for arginine-vasopressin of the mutant receptor, leading to blunted signaling activity. Treatment with the pharmacological chaperone SR121463 enhanced cell surface expression. CONCLUSION: The V88M mutation is associated with phenotypical diversity, which may be explained by the fact that both the expression level and the hormone-binding affinity are affected by the mutation. Our results provide a rational basis for treatment trials with vasopressin analogues in combination with pharmacologic chaperones in patients with this recurrently identified mutation.

Canadian Real-World Experience of Using Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insight From the PARASAIL Study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) on tolerability, safety, and quality of life (QoL) in Canadian patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in a real-life setting. METHODS: In Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Post-Approval Study Aimed at Characterizing the Use of LCZ696 at 97 mg Sacubitril/103 mg Valsartan bid in Patients With HFrEF (PARASAIL), an open-label, prospective, phase IV, multicentre study, outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association functional class II-III were followed up for 12 months. The suggested starting dose of sacubitril/valsartan was 24/26 mg b.i.d. replacing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, with an uptitration to 97/103 mg b.i.d. or as per clinical judgement. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: For the 302 patients included, the mean age was 64.47 years, and a majority of patients (82.8%) belonged to New York Heart Association class II. Overall, 195 (64.6%) patients were on maximum dose of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. after 6 months and 62.3% remained on this dose at month 12. Using patient global assessment, patients experienced an improvement in QoL. For Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores, a significant decrease from the baseline was observed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 (P < 0.0001 for all), which indicated an improvement in QoL. The patient global assessment and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire results correlate with moderate but significant changes in Euro quality of life-5D visual analogue scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the PARASAIL study in a real-life setting have shown that most patients were on sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. and the treatment was well tolerated. The patient-reported outcomes showed an overall improvement in patients' QoL.

CONTEXTE: L'objectif était de déterminer, en contexte réel, l'efficacité de l'association sacubitril à 97 mg/valsartan à 103 mg, deux fois par jour, sous l'angle de la tolérabilité, de l'innocuité et de la qualité de vie (QV) chez des patients canadiens atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection réduite. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Au cours de l'étude multicentrique et prospective sans insu de phase IV PARASAIL ( P rospective, Multicenter, Open L a bel, Post-App r ov a l S tudy Ai med at Characterizing the Use of L CZ696 at 97 mg Sacubitril/103 mg Valsartan bid in Patients With HFrEF), des patients externes atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque de classe fonctionnelle II ou III selon la NYHA (New York Heart Association) avec fraction d'éjection réduite ont été suivis durant 12 mois. La dose initiale recommandée était de 24 mg de sacubitril/26 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, à la place d'un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine ou d'un antagoniste des récepteurs de l'angiotensine; la dose devait être augmentée à 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, ou selon le jugement du clinicien. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la proportion de patients chez qui la dose cible de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, se trouvait atteinte après six mois de traitement. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des 302 patients admis était de 64,47 ans. La majorité de ces patients (82,8 %) présentaient une insuffisance cardiaque de classe II selon la NYHA. Globalement, 195 (64,6 %) patients prenaient la dose maximale de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, après six mois de traitement; 62,3 % continuaient de prendre cette dose à 12 mois de traitement. L'évaluation globale des patients indique une amélioration de leur QV. Les scores au Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire avaient significativement diminué par rapport aux scores de départ aux semaines 4, 12 et 24 (p < 0,0001 à tous les temps d'évaluation), ce qui indique une amélioration de la QV. L'évaluation globale des patients et les scores au Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire sont corrélés avec des variations modérées, mais significatives des scores de QV à l'échelle visuelle analogique du questionnaire EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: Les résultats obtenus en contexte réel au cours de l'étude PARASAIL montrent que la plupart des patients prenaient la dose de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, et que le traitement était bien toléré. Les résultats rapportés par les patients témoignent d'une amélioration globale de la QV de ces derniers.

Real-life effectiveness of indacaterol-glycopyrronium after switching from tiotropium or salmeterol/fluticasone therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD: the POWER study.

PURPOSE: In contrast to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), changes in maintenance pharmacotherapy in clinical practice occur without a washout period. The Prospective cohort study for the real-life effectiveness evaluation of glycOpyrronium With indacatERol combination in the management of COPD in Canada (POWER) study evaluated the real-life effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) following a direct switch from a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA, tiotropium) or long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance treatment (salmeterol/fluticasone [SFC]). METHODS: POWER was a single-cohort, prospective, multicenter, interventional study in which patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, who remained symptomatic on their current treatment of once-daily (od) tiotropium 18 µg or twice-daily (bid) SFC (any dose), were switched to treatment with open-label IND/GLY 110/50 µg od for 16 weeks. Effectiveness end points were change from baseline in trough FEV1, transition dyspnea index (TDI) total scores, and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores at 16 weeks. RESULTS: Trough FEV1 improved by 175 mL at Week 16 in patients who switched to IND/GLY. The change was 176 mL (95% CI: 135-217) when switched from tiotropium and 172 mL (95% CI: 85-258) when switched from SFC fixed-dose combination (FDC). At Week 16, significant improvements were observed in the mean TDI total scores (Δ=2.5) and CAT scores (Δ=-6.5) after the switch to IND/GLY treatment (both P<0.0001). Additionally, IND/GLY was well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, and no safety signal was observed. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice settings, a direct switch from previous treatment with either tiotropium or SFC to IND/GLY was safe and provided superior clinically significant improvements in lung function and patient-related outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02202616.