Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Crit Care ; 53: 46-52, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31195155

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and mortality of adult patients with community-acquired septic shock (CASS) and the influence of source control (SC) and other risk factors on the outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included patients with CASS admitted to the ICU at a university hospital (2003-2016). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors of ICU mortality. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients were included. The incidence showed an average annual increase of 4.9% and the mortality an average annual decrease of 1.4%. The patients who required SC showed a lower mortality (20.4%) than patients who did not require SC (31.3%) (p = 0.002). However, the evolution in mortality was different: Mortality decreased in patients who did not require SC (from 56.3% to 20%; p = 0.02), but did not differ in those who required SC (from 21.4% to 27.6%; p = 0.43). In the multivariate analysis, severity at admission, age, alcoholism, cirrhosis, ARDS, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were associated with worse outcome, whereas appropriate antibiotic treatment and adequate SC were independently associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CASS increased and the ICU mortality decreased during the study period. The mortality was mainly due to a decrease in mortality in infections not requiring SC.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Choque Séptico/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/etiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Choque Séptico/etiologia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Espanha/epidemiologia
2.
Ann Intensive Care ; 5(1): 54, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26059205

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cuff pressure (P cuff) control is mandatory to avoid leakage of oral secretions passing the tracheal tube and tracheal ischemia. The aim of the present trial was to determine the efficacy of a mechanical device (PressureEasy®) in the continuous control of P cuff in patients intubated with polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-cuffed tracheal tubes, compared with routine care using a manometer. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, cross-over study. All patients requiring intubation with a predicted duration of mechanical ventilation ≥48 h were eligible. Eighteen patients randomly received continuous control of P cuff with PressureEasy® device for 24 h, followed by discontinuous control (every 4 h) with a manual manometer for 24 h, or vice versa. P cuff and airway pressure were continuously recorded. P cuff target was 25 cmH2O during the two periods. RESULTS: The percentage of time spent with P cuff 20-30 cmH2O (median (IQR) 34 % (17-57) versus 50 % (35-64), p = 0.184) and the percentage of time spent with P cuff <20 cmH2O (23 % (5-63) versus 43 % (16-60), p = 0.5) were similar during continuous control of P cuff and routine care, respectively. However, the percentage of time spent with P cuff >30 cmH2O was significantly higher during continuous control compared with routine care of tracheal cuff (26 % (14-39) versus 7 % (1-18), p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in P cuff (25 (18-28) versus 21 (18-26), p = 0.17), mean airway pressure (14 (10-17) versus 14 (11-16), p = 0.679), or coefficient of variation of P cuff (19 % (11-26) versus 20 % (11-25), p = 0.679) during continuous control compared with routine care of tracheal cuff, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PressureEasy® did not demonstrate a better control of P cuff between 20 and 30 cmH2O, compared with routine care using a manometer. Moreover, the device use resulted in significantly higher time spent with overinflation of tracheal cuff, which might increase the risk for tracheal ischemic lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT02109003.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa