Practice patterns and outcomes associated with intravenous albumin in patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend albumin as the plasma-expander of choice for acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis. However, the impact of these recommendations on patient outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to determine the practice-patterns and outcomes associated with albumin use in a large, nationwide-US cohort of hospitalized cirrhotics with AKI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in hospitalized cirrhotics with AKI using Cerner-Health-Facts database from January 2009 to March 2018. 6786 were included for analysis on albumin-practice-patterns, and 4126 had available outcomes data. Propensity-score-adjusted model was used to determine the association between albumin use, AKI-recovery and in-hospital survival. RESULTS: Median age was 61-years (60% male, 70% white), median serum-creatinine was 1.8 mg/dL and median Model for End-stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELD-Na) score was 24. Albumin was given to 35% of patients, of which 50% received albumin within 48-hours of AKI-onset, and 17% received appropriate weight-based dosing. Albumin was used more frequently in patients with advanced complications of cirrhosis, higher MELD-Na scores and patients admitted to urban-teaching hospitals. After propensity-matching and multivariable adjustment, albumin use was not associated with AKI-recovery (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% confidence-interval [CI]: 0.59-1.07, P = .130) or in-hospital survival (OR 0.76 [95% CI: 0.46-1.25], P = .280), compared with crystalloids. Findings were unchanged in subgroup analyses of patients with varying cirrhosis complications and disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: USA hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI frequently do not receive intravenous albumin, and albumin use was not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Prospective randomised trials are direly needed to evaluate the impact of albumin in cirrhotics with AKI.

Efficacy and Follow-up of Segmental or Subtotal Colectomy in Patients With Colitis-Associated Neoplasia.

The historical approach to neoplasia in the setting of chronic colitis was to perform a total proctocolectomy. Recent consensus and society guidelines1-3 suggest that when dysplastic lesions can be removed endoscopically, continued surveillance is appropriate. This is based on improvements in optical technologies and the low risk of metachronous colorectal carcinoma in these patients.4-6 We hypothesized that if a lesion was completely removed surgically and followed up endoscopically, metachronous colorectal carcinoma would be a rare occurrence. Thus, segmental resection may be offered as a definitive surgery in patients with chronic colitis and localized colorectal neoplasia in whom endoscopic resection is not feasible. Retention of the distal colon/rectum is expected to result in an overall improved quality of life compared with permanent ileostomy or an ileoanal J-pouch. Here, we report our experience and follow-up evaluation of segmental resections for preoperative neoplasia in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC).

Many Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Are Not Immune to Measles or Pertussis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines emphasize vaccination for influenza and pneumococcus for IBD patients and the avoidance of live virus vaccines for those who are on immunosuppressive (ISS) therapy. Given the recent resurgence of measles and pertussis infections, we assessed the immune status of our IBD population in order to advise about these risks. METHODS: We prospectively collected measles and pertussis titers in our IBD patients from February 1-May 1, 2015. Immune status based on standard threshold values was determined: measles antibodies ≤0.8 antibody index (AI) = negative immunity, 0.9-1.1 AI = equivocal immunity and titers ≥1.2 AI = positive immunity. For pertussis immunity, anti-pertussis antibodies ≤5 IU/mL were considered negative immunity. Univariate analysis was performed to examine predictive factors including age, disease duration, and current medical therapies. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients' titers were assessed (77 Crohn's disease, 1 indeterminate colitis, and 45 ulcerative colitis). Sixteen (13.1 %) patients lacked detectable immunity to measles, and four (3 %) had equivocal immunity. Twelve (75 %) of the measles non-immune patients were on ISS therapy versus 65 (64 %) of 102 immune patients (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 0.5-5.9, p = 0.34). Out of 96 patients, 58 (60 %) were not immune to pertussis. Disease duration ≥10 years and age ≥50 were associated with significant lower measles titers. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of our IBD patients lack immunity to measles, and a majority of our IBD patients do not have detectable immunity to pertussis. Importantly, the majority of the measles non-immune patients are on ISS therapy and therefore unable to receive a booster.

The Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Survey of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient Health Care Access.

BACKGROUND: Despite anecdotal information about unaffordable care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there are no data regarding access to health care resources and expert care for patients with IBD. Our study was designed to assess IBD patients' ability to access and use care, as well as the timeliness, affordability, and financial stressors related to care. METHODS: We modified the Centers for Disease Control National Health Interview Survey for IBD. The resultant 59-question survey was electronically mailed to the entire Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) mailing list. Three thousand six hundred eight adult U.S. respondents completed the survey. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Respondents who had insurance coverage were 96.1%, but 66.3% reported health care-related financial worry. Of the 452 patients who tried to obtain new insurance coverage in the year prior, 60.1% (n = 270) reported difficulty finding sufficient coverage. We found that 25.4% (n = 897) of patients reported delays in medical care, and 48.0% (n = 431) of those respondents reported that the delay was due to cost concerns. Respondents who were denied coverage by an insurance company were 55.3%. Risk factors for emergency department utilization included Crohn's disease, younger age, female sex, lower income, non-White race, and steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment of patient health care access suggests that many patients have health care-related financial worry and have forgone a variety of medical services because of cost, lack of prompt access to care, denial by insurance carriers, and worry over medical coverage. We also identify risk factors for emergency department utilization. These data inform additional studies and interventions to improve access for patients with IBD.

Surveillance of IBD Using High Definition Colonoscopes Does Not Miss Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Low-grade Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Historically, limits to the ability to detect dysplasia in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated colitis resulted in the recommendation that neoplasia of any grade be treated by proctocolectomy. We hypothesized that with improved optical technologies, most neoplasia in colitis is now detectable and reassessed the prevalence of colitis-associated neoplasia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all our patients with IBD who had pathologist-confirmed neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy and underwent a subsequent colectomy. We included patients whose index lesions were found between 2005 and 2014 (the dates of our high definition equipment) and recorded the location and grade of these lesions. These findings were compared to the surgical specimens, and in patients with partial colectomies, included follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with IBD (19 [53%] ulcerative colitis and 17 [47%] Crohn's disease) were found to have neoplastic lesions on surveillance colonoscopy and underwent a subsequent partial colectomy or total proctocolectomy. Forty-four index lesions were identified by colonoscopy (29 white light and 7 methylene blue chromoscopy): 30 low-grade dysplasia, 6 high-grade dysplasia, and 8 adenocarcinoma. None of the low-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma index lesions were associated with synchronous carcinoma at colectomy. One of the patients with high-grade dysplasia had adenocarcinoma of the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: In this experience with high definition colonoscopes in chronic colitis, no synchronous adenocarcinomas were found when colectomy was performed for low-grade dysplasia or index adenocarcinoma, and only 1 adenocarcinoma in the appendix was found in the setting of high-grade dysplasia. These findings suggest that active surveillance or subtotal colectomy may be safe options for patients with IBD and some grades of neoplasia.

Penetrating Disease, Narcotic Use, and Loop Ostomy Are Associated with Ostomy and IBD-related Complications After Ostomy Surgery in Crohn's Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: For medically refractory or obstructive Crohn's disease (CD), ostomy surgery remains an important therapeutic option. Outcomes and complications of this approach have not been well described in the era of biological therapies. Our study aims to characterize CD patients undergoing ostomy creation and assess outcome predictors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of CD patients who underwent ostomy creation in our center from 2011 to 2014. Data collected include patient demographics, detailed disease- and surgery-related variables, and clinical outcomes after 26 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients, 54 % were female, the median age was 39 years (range 19-78), the median disease duration was 13 years (range 0-50), 54 % had ileo-colonic disease, 55 % had stricturing phenotype, and 59 % had perianal disease. Sixty-two percent received end ostomies, and 38 % received loop ostomies. The leading indications for surgery were stricturing, fistulizing, and perianal disease (35 %). Forty-three (38 %) patients had 76 major complications, including dehydration (22 cases), intra-abdominal infection (16), and obstruction (14). Increased major postoperative complications correlated with penetrating disease (p = 0.02, odds ratio [OR] = 5.52, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.25-24.42), the use of narcotics before surgery (p = 0.04, OR = 2.54, 95 % CI = 1.02-6.34), and loop ostomies (p = 0.004, OR = 4.2, 95 % CI = 1.57-11.23). CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating phenotype, the use of narcotics before surgery, and loop ostomies are associated with major complications in CD patients undergoing ostomy creation. These findings may influence risk management of CD patients needing ostomies.

Patient perceptions of fecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), the delivery of stool from a healthy prescreened donor to an individual with disease, is gaining increasing recognition as a potential treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases. Our objective was to describe patient interest in and social concerns around FMT. METHODS: We conducted a survey of adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) seen in outpatient clinic at the University of Chicago IBD Center. All English-speaking patients ≥18 years of age were eligible. Subjects completed a written survey in clinic. Ninety-five participants, median age 39 years, 53% female, were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: Forty-four percent and 49% reported excellent or good/satisfactory medical management of their UC, respectively. Forty-six percent participants were willing to undergo FMT as a treatment of UC, 43% were unsure, and 11% were unwilling to undergo FMT. Subjects who had been hospitalized were more willing to undergo FMT, 54% versus 34%, P = 0.035. Primary concerns included the following: adequate screening for infections (41%), cleanliness (24%), and potential to worsen UC (18%); 21% reported no specific concerns. For donor selection, an equal number of participants (46%) preferred whomever their doctor recommended or family member/spouse. CONCLUSIONS: In our center despite reporting satisfactory to excellent disease control with their treatments, the vast majority of patients with UC are interested in or willing to consider FMT. Proof of safety and effectiveness, and failure of other medical therapies are key issues in considering FMT. Strong interest in this as-yet unproven therapy warrants attention and is a pressing priority for clinical research and education.