Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 146(6): 4171, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31893677

RESUMO

Polish is a geminating language with true lexical geminates that form minimal pairs with their singleton counterparts. What is more, Polish, unlike many other geminating languages, allows both single-articulated and rearticulated geminate realisations. In this study, durational properties of Polish geminates together with preceding and following vowels were analysed to compare Polish to other geminating languages. Fifty-four native speakers of Polish were recorded producing geminates and singletons in controlled carrier sentences during a reading task. The results revealed that the main durational cue to the geminate/singleton contrast was consonant duration with a geminate-to-singleton ratio (G/S) of 2.48. Vowels preceding or following geminates and singletons did not differ significantly in duration. Rearticulated geminates occurred 22% of the time and were not significantly longer or shorter than single-articulated geminates. The current results locate Polish among the languages with a medium-to-high G/S ratio and without vowel duration as a cue to a geminate/singleton contrast. Finally, the results allow for the discussion of the behaviour of Polish geminates relative to other languages as well as to indicate directions for further research into the phenomenon of geminate rearticulation.

2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 143(5): EL328, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29857772

RESUMO

The purpose of the study was to analyse human identification of Polish vowels from static and dynamic durationally slowed visual cues. A total of 152 participants identified 6 Polish vowels produced by 4 speakers from static (still images) and dynamic (videos) cues. The results show that 59% of static vowels and 63% of dynamic vowels were successfully identified. There was a strong confusion between vowels within front, central, and back classes. Finally, correct identification strongly depended on speakers, showing that speakers differ significantly in how "clearly" they produce vowel configurations.


Assuntos
Sinais (Psicologia) , Fonética , Estimulação Luminosa/métodos , Percepção da Fala/fisiologia , Percepção Visual/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Linguística/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa