RESUMO
A 76-year-old male with severe comorbidities and multiple cardiovascular risk factors including stage IV chronic kidney disease presents with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. An ultra-low contrast invasive coronary angiography using the DyeVert system and iso-osmolar contrast agent revealed a multivessel disease with heavy calcifications involving the left main stem and its bifurcation requiring a complex percutaneous coronary intervention. Because of the high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, a zero-contrast intervention was performed using intravascular ultrasound guidance and dedicated stenting techniques with optimal imaging, clinical, and renal outcomes. Zero-contrast policies can be safely implemented even in complex clinical scenarios but at least two orthogonal angiographic projections should always be acquired to rule out distal complications.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Angiografia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous circulatory support allows the performance of coronary interventions in ever more complex anatomic and clinical situations. The large-bore systems currently available need a suitable vascular calibre to be inserted restricting percutaneous access mainly to the common femoral artery. CASE SUMMARY: We present the case of a 64-year-old man, admitted with an acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure, due to triple-vessel coronary artery disease with left main involvement and left ventricular dysfunction. He was successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) supported through an IMPELLA 2.5L circulatory system. Concomitant severe and diffuse peripheral vascular disease did not allow femoral insertion of the circulatory support which was therefore successfully introduced through a left brachial percutaneous approach. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a brachial, percutaneous placement of the IMPELLA 2.5L system to support a high-risk PCI procedure. In appropriately selected patients, this approach could be an option when common vascular accesses are not available.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several progressively refined percutaneous devices for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure have been recently developed. We describe our single-center experience with the new Gore septal occluder (GSO). METHODS: Between January 2012 and May 2013, all consecutive patients with a PFO and previous cerebral thromboembolic events underwent percutaneous closure with the GSO system. Device implantation was performed under local anesthesia with combined fluoroscopic and intracardiac echographic monitoring. Follow-up schedule was: transthoracic echo at day 1 and day 30, as well as transcranial Doppler at 6 months and 12 months, all with clinical concomitant evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (11 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 51.2 ± 13.9 years (range, 40-74 years) had PFO closure. At baseline, 4 and 18 subjects had medium-grade and large-grade right to left permanent shunt, respectively; isolated PFO was present in 13 patients and PFO with atrial septal aneurysm was present in 9 patients. Device placement was successful in all patients. Median procedural and fluoroscopic times were 40.5 minutes (range, 22-92 minutes) and 6.5 minutes (range, 3-16 minutes), respectively. Clinical and instrumental follow-up data were obtained at 12 months in 22 patients (100%). A low-grade (<5 microbubbles) permanent residual shunt was registered in 5 patients at 6 months and in 2 patients (during Valsalva only) at 12-month follow-up. Functional PFO occlusion was thus obtained in all patients. CONCLUSION: This single-center initial experience suggests that the GSO is a safe and effective closure device, straightforward to implant with quick deployment and minimal imaging, and suitable for a range of atrial septal anatomies. Incidence and entity of residual shunts at follow-up were consistent with functional PFO occlusion in all patients.