Effects of socioeconomic burden on opioid use following total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid users experience worse outcomes and higher complication rates compared to opioid-naïve patients following shoulder arthroplasty. This study evaluates the effects of socioeconomic status, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), on pre- and postoperative opioid use and its influence on clinical outcomes such as readmission and revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty (Current Procedural Terminology code 23472) from 2014 to 2022 at a single academic institution was performed. Exclusion criteria included arthroplasty for fracture, active malignancy, and revision arthroplasty. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, DCI, and clinical outcomes including 90-day readmission and revision surgery were collected. Patients were classified according to the DCI score of their zip code. Using the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database, patient pre- and postoperative opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents was gathered. RESULTS: Individuals from distressed communities used more opioids within 90 days preoperatively compared to patients from prosperous, comfortable, mid-tier, and at-risk populations, respectively. Patients from distressed communities also used significantly more opioids within 90 days postoperatively compared with prosperous, comfortable, and mid-tier, respectively. Of patients from distressed communities, 35.1% developed prolonged opioid use (filling prescriptions >30 days after surgery), significantly more than all other cohorts. Among all patients, 3.5% were readmitted within 90 days and were more likely to be prolonged opioid users (38.9 vs. 21.3%, P < .001). Similarly, 1.5% of patients underwent revision surgery. Those who underwent revision were significantly more likely to be prolonged opioid users (38.2 vs. 21.7%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder arthroplasty patients from distressed communities use more opioids within 90 days before and after their surgery and are more likely to become prolonged opioid users, placing them at risk for readmission and revision surgery. Identifying patients at an increased risk for excess opioid use is essential to employ appropriate strategies that minimize the detrimental effects of prolonged use following surgery.

Distressed communities demonstrate increased readmission and health care utilization following shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to affect outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), but little is known regarding how SES and the communities in which patients reside can affect postoperative health care utilization. With the growing use of bundled payment models, understanding what factors put patients at risk for readmission and the ways in which patients utilize the health care system postoperatively is crucial for preventing excess costs for providers. This study helps surgeons predict which patients are high-risk and may require additional surveillance following shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of 6170 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic and reverse; Current Procedural Terminology code 23472) from 2014-2020 at a single academic institution was performed. Exclusion criteria included arthroplasty for fracture, active malignancy, and revision arthroplasty. Demographics, patient zip code, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were attained. Patients were classified according to the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) score of their zip code. The DCI combines several metrics of socioeconomic well-being to generate a single score. Zip codes are then classified by scores into 5 categories based on national quintiles. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included number of postoperative medication prescriptions, patient telephone calls to the office, and follow-up office visits. RESULTS: Among all patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty, individuals from distressed communities were more likely than their prosperous counterparts to experience an unplanned readmission (odds ratio = 1.77, P = .045). Patients from comfortable (relative risk [RR] = 1.12, P < .001), midtier (RR = 1.13, P < .001), at-risk (RR = 1.20, P < .001), and distressed (RR = 1.17, P < .001) communities were all more likely to use more medications compared to those from prosperous communities. Likewise, those from comfortable (RR = 0.92, P < .001), midtier (RR = 0.88, P < .001), at-risk (RR = 0.93, P = .008), and distressed (RR = 0.93, P = .033) communities, respectively, were at a lower risk of making calls compared to prosperous communities. CONCLUSIONS: Following primary total shoulder arthroplasty, patients who reside in distressed communities are at significantly increased risk of experiencing an unplanned readmission and increased health care utilization postoperatively. This study revealed that patient socioeconomic distress is more associated with readmission than race following TSA. Increased awareness and employing strategies to maintain and ultimately improve communication with patients offers a potential solution to reduce excessive health care utilization, benefiting both patients and providers alike.

Total shoulder arthroplasty using an inlay glenoid component for glenoid deficiency: mid- to long-term follow-up of a previously published cohort.

BACKGROUND: The short-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty with an inlay glenoid component performed by a single surgeon in patients with glenoid bone loss have previously been reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of these patients. METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty with an inlay glenoid component performed by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2019 for severe glenoid dysplasia and/or glenoid bone loss. Patients with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were evaluated regarding preoperative and postoperative range of motion, radiographic findings, visual analog scale pain scores, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. RESULTS: Overall, 39 shoulders in 33 patients were treated with an inlay glenoid component for severe glenoid bone loss. Four patients were lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died with a well-functioning implant in place. The final cohort included 34 shoulders in 28 patients (46.4% female patients [13 of 28] and 53.6% male patients [15 of 28]) with a mean age of 66.9 years (range, 58-81 years) and mean follow-up period of 68.3 months. Of the 34 cases, 5 were revision cases. One patient died following 2-year follow-up. Of the shoulders, 10 were classified as Walch type A2, 4 were classified as Walch type B3, and 15 were classified as Walch type C; 5 shoulders were unable to be classified. We observed statistically significant increases in range of motion (forward elevation, 38.1° [P < .001]; external rotation, 18.8° [P < .001]) and improvement in the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (from 26.6 to 81.0, P < .001). Two patients underwent conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty at 2.2 and 1.7 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Inlay glenoid components provide a low rate of revision and improved clinical and functional outcomes at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Spacers for life: high mortality rate associated with definitive treatment of shoulder periprosthetic infection with permanent antibiotic spacer.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection following shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons. Although recent studies have supported 2-stage exchanges, this treatment choice may not be appropriate for all patients. Definitive antibiotic spacer placement represents one treatment strategy with limited reported outcomes in the literature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mortality rate and functional outcomes associated with definitive spacer placement. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 17 patients who were treated with definitive antibiotic spacer placement (18 spacers) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The mortality rate over the study period was determined. Demographic information, clinical course, patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Veterans RAND 12 [VR-12] score), infection parameters as defined by International Consensus Meeting criteria, radiographic evaluation findings, and rotator cuff integrity at the time of spacer placement were collected. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent treatment with retained antibiotic spacers at a mean age of 62.4 years (range, 50-73 years). Ten patients were women, and the mean body mass index was 30.5 (range, 22.9-39.9). Spacer placement occurred at a mean of 6.1 years (range, 0.48-14.9 years) following index arthroplasty. Five patients required spacer exchange. The most common organisms were Cutibacterium acnes (6) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (6); in addition, methicillin-resistant S aureus (2), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (2), Serratia marcescens (1), gram-positive cocci (1), Enterobacter faecalis (1), Enterobacter cloacae (1), diphtheroids (1), and an infection with negative culture findings (1) were observed. The mortality rate was 52.9% (9 of 17 patients). Among the 8 surviving patients, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 33.9 (range, 13.3-80.0), the mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 35.6 (range, 0.0-80.0), the mean VR-12 mental score was 57.2 (range, 36.6-66.9), and the mean VR-12 physical score was 37.1 (range, 21.7-64.0) at a mean of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-8.8 years). CONCLUSION: Definitive antibiotic spacer placement is an acceptable method to treat infection in medically frail patients who have a high mortality risk. Spacer exchange may be necessary because of persistent infection, and functional results are poor.

Risk Factors and Effect of Acute Kidney Injury on Outcomes Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a potentially avoidable complication associated with negative outcomes including discharge to facilities and mortality. Few studies have identified modifiable risk factors or strategies that the surgeon may use to reduce this risk. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing primary TJA at a single hospital from 2005 to 2017, and collected patient demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, as well as perioperative laboratory results. We defined AKI as an increase in creatinine levels by 50% or 0.3 points. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes between patients who developed AKI and those who did not. Multivariate regressions identified the independent effect of AKI on outcomes. A stochastic gradient boosting model was constructed to predict AKI. RESULTS: In total, 814 (3.9%) of 20,800 patients developed AKI. AKI independently increased length of stay by 0.26 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.38, P < .001), in-hospital complication risk (odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI 1.45-2.07, P < .001), and discharge to facility risk (odds ratio = 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.53, P = .012). Forty-one predictive variables were included in the predictive model, with important potentially modifiable variables including body mass index, perioperative hemoglobin levels, surgery duration, and operative fluids administered. The final predictive model demonstrated excellent performance with a c-statistic of 0.967. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that AKI has adverse effects on outcome metrics including length of stay, discharge, and complications. Although many risk factors are nonmodifiable, maintaining adequate renal perfusion through optimizing preoperative hemoglobin, sufficient fluid resuscitation, and reducing blood loss, such as through the use of tranexamic acid, may aid in mitigating this risk.

A Novel Adjunct Indicator of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Platelet Count and Mean Platelet Volume.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and often requires a combination of objective findings. The purpose of this study is to determine whether platelets, a known acute phase reactant, would be able to further aid in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review study was performed on all revision total hip and knee arthroplasties done between 2000 and 2016 (n = 4939). PJI was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (n = 949). Platelet count and mean platelet volume were assessed from each patient's preoperative complete blood count. These values were then assessed as a ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio for PJI patients was 33.45 compared to 25.68 for patients in the aseptic revision cohort (P < .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrates that a ratio of 31.70 has a sensitivity of 48.10 (95% confidence interval 44.9-51.4) and a specificity of 80.85 (95% confidence interval 79.6-82.1). This specificity was higher than that of both estimated sedimentation ratio (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the same cohorts using optimal values determined via ROC curve analysis. When used in conjunction with ESR and CRP, there was a statistically significant increase in the diagnostic performance of the model used to assess PJI relative to the model that just employed ESR and CRP (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that platelets and their associated serum biomarkers are associated with PJI and warrant consideration in patients who are being evaluated for potential PJI.

Traditional Risk Factors and Logistic Regression Failed to Reliably Predict a "Bundle Buster" After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if we could identify patient factors that were predictive of Medicare and privately insured patients being "high-cost." METHODS: Ninety-day episode-of-care insurance company payments along with collected demographics, comorbidities, and readmissions were reviewed for a consecutive series of primary total joint arthroplasty patients from 2015 to 2016 at our institution. High-cost patients were identified by determining those patients above the cutoff, where the cost data became demonstrably nonparametric and both univariate analysis and logistical regressions were performed to identify risk factors that lead to increased costs. Receiver operator curves were created to determine the predictive nature of these risk factors. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that high-cost privately insured patients were significantly older, more likely to be readmitted and less likely to be discharged to home (P < .001) whereas high-cost Medicare total knee/total hip arthroplasty patients were more likely to have many of the comorbidities analyzed. Logistical regression did not find any predictive factors for privately insured patients and found that diabetes (OR 1.47 and 1.75, respectively), congestive heart failure (OR 1.94 and 3.46, respectively), cerebrovascular event (OR 2.20 and 2.20, respectively) and rheumatic disease (OR 1.78 and 1.78, respectively) were all predictive of being a high-cost Medicare patient. CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors for postoperative complications are not reliably associated with increased patient costs after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, the risk factors associated with increased costs vary greatly between privately insured and Medicare-insured patients. Further investigation is necessary to identify cost drivers in this patient subset to preventive higher costs.

Failure After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Antibiotics in the Cement Spacer.

BACKGROUND: Failure after a 2-stage exchange surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is high. Previous studies demonstrated that positive cultures at reimplantation are associated with failure afterward. The aim of this multicenter study was to define the role of antibiotics in the cement spacer in relation to reimplantation cultures and subsequent failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2-stage exchange procedures between 2000 and 2015. Culture-negative PJIs, cases in which no cultures were obtained during reimplantation, and cases without data on cement spacers were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four cases were included. The rate of positive cultures during reimplantation was 9.5% for cement spacers containing a glycopeptide (27/284) (with or without an aminoglycoside) vs 21.7% for those containing monotherapy with an aminoglycoside (13/60) (P = .008), and was mostly attributed by a reduction in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (17% vs 2%, P < .001). The failure rate was >2-fold higher at 40.0% (16/40) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 15.8% (48/304) for those with negative cultures (P < .001). Overall, a glycopeptide in the cement spacer was not associated with a lower failure rate (18% vs 23%, P = .3), but was associated with lower failure due to CoNS (2.5% vs 13.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a 2-stage exchange procedure for PJI, adding a glycopeptide to the cement spacer reduces the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation and is associated with a lower failure rate due to CoNS afterward.

Web-Based, Self-Directed Physical Therapy After Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Safe and Effective for Most, but Not All, Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggested that unsupervised, self-directed physical therapy (SDPT) is both safe and efficacious for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and that formal outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) may not be routinely required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the routine use of an SDPT program in a nonselect patient population. METHODS: This is a multi-surgeon, single-institution, retrospective study of 941 consecutive patients discharged home, from January 2016 to December 2016, after primary, unilateral THA and enrolled in a web-based SDPT program. Patients were seen 4 weeks after surgery and OPPT was prescribed for perceived need, patient request, or if unable to use the web-based program. Patient-reported outcomes, medical comorbidities, and assessment of home environment were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 646 of 941 patients (68.7%) were not prescribed OPPT (SDPT-only group) while 295 of 941 patients (31.3%) were prescribed OPPT (SDPT + OPPT group). In the SDPT + OPPT group, 88.2% were for perceived need, 10.8% for patient request, and 1.0% due to inability to use the web-based platform. Multivariate analysis identified male sex (odds ratio, 0.64; 0.45-0.90; P = .012) and a higher preoperative Short Form-12 physical component (odds ratio, 0.98; 0.96-0.99; P = .036) as independent variables protective against requiring OPPT. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, the SDPT-only group had statistically higher hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score junior compared to the SDPT + OPPT cohort (85.0 vs 80.9; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Web-based SDPT is safe and effective for most, but not all, patients eligible for home discharge after THA. It is critical to preserve OPPT services for the one-third of patients who require them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Self-Directed Home Exercises vs Outpatient Physical Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Value and Outcomes Following a Protocol Change.

BACKGROUND: The need for outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) has been questioned following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent studies have suggested that similar outcomes may be possible with self-directed home exercise programs (HEP) compared to OPPT, which can be costly to both the patient and healthcare system. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety, efficacy, and health economics of formal OPPT with self-directed home exercises after TKA following a protocol change. METHODS: A single-surgeon, retrospective study of 520 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA from 2016 to 2018 was performed. All 251 TKAs performed in 2016 were routinely prescribed OPPT, while all 269 TKAs in 2017 completed a self-directed HEP alone for 2 weeks. At their 2-week visit, OPPT was prescribed if patients had less than 90° range of motion or per patient request. Financial data of postdischarge costs were collected for all patients. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated for variables associated with failure of the HEP program. RESULTS: Overall, 65.8% (177/269) of patients in the HEP group did not require OPPT. There was no significant difference in percentage of patients whose range of motion was less than 90° at 2-week follow-up between OPPT and HEP (14% vs 11.9%, P = .467). Between OPPT and HEP, there were no differences in manipulation under anesthesia (3.2% vs 3%, P = .883). On average, patients who received OPPT incurred an increase in average cost of $1340.87 and $1893.42 for Medicare and private insurer patients, respectively. We did not identify any significant risk factors for failing HEP. CONCLUSION: Comparable outcomes were demonstrated between patients receiving HEP compared to OPPT with a substantial cost saving. While a portion of patients still require formal OPPT, the majority do not. Surgeons should consider an initial trial of HEP with close follow-up in order to limit unnecessary costs associated with OPPT.

The Economics of Antibiotic Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Added Cost with No Reduction in Infection Rates.

BACKGROUND: To reduce the substantial clinical and financial burden of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), some surgeons advocate for the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although its effectiveness continues to be debated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the routine use of ALBC is cost-effective in reducing PJI after primary TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients undergoing cemented primary TKA at two hospitals within our institution from 2015 to 2017. We compared demographics, comorbidities, costs, and PJI rates between patients receiving ALBC and plain cement. We performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of ALBC on PJI rate. We calculated readmission costs for PJI and reduction in PJI needed to justify the added cost of ALBC. RESULTS: Of 2511 patients, 1077 underwent TKA with ALBC (43%), with no difference in PJI rates (0.56% vs 0.14%, P = .0662) or complications (1.2% vs 1.6%, P = .3968) but higher cement costs ($416 vs $117, P < .0001) and overall procedure costs ($6445 vs $5.968, P < .0001). ALBC had no effect on infection rate (P = .0894). Patients readmitted with PJI had higher overall 90-day episode-of-care claims costs ($49,341 vs $19,032, P < .001). To justify additional costs, ALBC would need to prevent infection in one of every 101 patients. CONCLUSION: Routine use of ALBC in primary TKA is not cost-effective, adding $299 to the cost of episode of care without a reduction in PJI rate. Further study is needed to determine whether select use of ALBC would be justified in high-risk patients.

Web-Based, Self-Directed Physical Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Safe and Effective for Most, but Not All, Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently, self-directed physical therapy (SDPT) programs have gained popularity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the routine use of an SDPT program in a nonselect patient population. METHODS: This is a single-surgeon, retrospective study of 296 consecutive patients from August 2016 to October 2017 discharged home after primary, unilateral TKA and enrolled in a web-based SDPT program. Patients were seen 2 weeks after surgery and outpatient physical therapy (OPPT) was prescribed if flexion was less than 90°, upon patient request, or inability to use the web-based platform. RESULTS: Overall, 195 of 296 (65.9%) patients did not require OPPT (SDPT-only) while 101 of 296 were prescribed OPPT (34.1%, SDPT + OPPT). In SDPT + OPPT, 66.3% were for flexion <90°, 27.7% by patient request, 5.0% received a prescription but did not attend OPPT, and 1.0% due to inability to use the web-based platform. The rate of manipulation under anesthesia was 2.36% overall (SDPT + OPPT, 6.93%; SDPT-only, 0.0%). Multivariate analysis identified elevated Charlson comorbidity index, elevated body mass index, higher preoperative SF12 mental score, and loss of flexion at 2 weeks as independent predictors associated with the need for OPPT. CONCLUSION: Web-based SDPT is safe and effective for most patients eligible for home discharge after TKA. It is difficult to preoperatively predict those patients who will require OPPT; therefore, we recommend close follow-up. It is critical to preserve these services for patients who require them after TKA as up to a third of patients required OPPT.

How Much Does a Readmission Cost the Bundle Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: As alternative payment models increase in popularity for total joint arthroplasty (TJA), providers and hospitals now share the financial risk associated with unexpected readmissions. While studies have identified postacute care as a driver for costs in a bundle, the fiscal burden associated with specific causes of readmission is unclear. The purpose of this study is to quantify the additional costs associated with each of the causes of readmission following primary TJA. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of primary TJA patients at our institution from 2015 to 2016 using claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Medicare Advantage patients from a single private insurer. We collected demographic data, medical comorbidities, 90-day episode-of-care costs, and readmissions for all patients. Medical records for each readmission were reviewed and classified into 1 of 11 categories. We then compared the mean facility readmission costs, postacute care costs, and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs between the reasons for readmission. RESULTS: Of the 4704 patients, there were 325 readmissions in 286 patients (6.1%), with 50% being readmitted to a different facility than their index surgery hospital. The mean additional cost was $8588 per readmission. Medical reasons accounted for the majority of readmissions (n = 257, 79.1%). However, patients readmitted for revision surgery (n = 68, 20.9%) had the highest mean readmission cost ($15,356, P < .001). Furthermore, readmissions for revision surgery had the highest mean postacute care ($37,207, P = .002) and overall episode-of-care costs ($52,162, P = .003). Risk factors for readmission included age >75 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; P < .001), body mass index >35 kg/m2 (OR, 1.63; P = .004), history of congestive heart failure (OR, 2.47; P = .002), diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.0; P < .001), and renal disease (OR, 2.28; P = .005). CONCLUSION: Providers participating in alternative payment models should be cognizant of the increased bundle costs attributed to readmissions, especially due to revision surgery. Improved communication with patients and close postoperative monitoring may help minimize the large percentage of readmissions at different facilities.

Bundled Payments Are Effective in Reducing Costs Following Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Alternative payment models such the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative have been effective in reducing costs following unilateral total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies exist on bilateral arthroplasty. This study aimed to determine whether the BPCI program for bilateral THA and TKA reduced episode-of-care costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary THA and TKA between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographic variables, comorbidities, readmissions, and calculated 90-day episode-of-care costs based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. We compared data from patients before and after the start of our BPCI program, and performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs. RESULTS: Of 319 patients, 38 underwent bilateral THA (12%) while 287 underwent bilateral TKA (88%). There were 239 patients (74%) in the bundled payment group. Although there was no change in readmission rate (9% vs 8%), the post-BPCI group demonstrated reduced hospital costs ($21,251 vs $18,783), post-acute care costs ($15,488 vs $12,439), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($39,733 vs $34,305). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, our BPCI model demonstrated a per-patient reduction of $5811 in overall claims costs. Additional risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs included age ($516/y increase) and cardiac disease ($5916). CONCLUSION: Our bundled payment program for bilateral THA and TKA was successful with reduction in 90-day episode-of-care costs without placing the patient at higher risk of readmission. Older Medicare beneficiaries and those with cardiac disease should likely not undergo a simultaneous bilateral procedure due to concerns about increased costs.

A Nurse Navigator Program Is Effective in Reducing Episode-of-Care Costs Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Alternative payment models for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have incentivized providers to deliver higher quality care at a lower cost, prompting some institutions to develop formal nurse navigation programs (NNPs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a NNP for primary THA and TKA resulted in decreased episode-of-care (EOC) costs. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015-2016 using claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Medicare Advantage patients from a private insurer. Three nurse navigators were hired to guide discharge disposition and home needs. Ninety-day EOC costs were collected before and after implementation of the NNP. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the independent effect of the NNP on EOC costs. RESULTS: During the study period, 5275 patients underwent primary TKA or THA. When compared with patients in the prenavigator group, the NNP group had reduced 90-day EOC costs ($19,116 vs $20,418 for Medicare and $35,378 vs $36,961 for private payer, P < .001 and P < .012, respectively). Controlling for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis, the NNP resulted in a $1575 per Medicare patient (P < .001) and a $1819 per private payer patient cost reduction (P = .005). This translates to a cost savings of at least $5,556,600 per year. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a NNP resulted in a marked reduction in EOC costs following primary THA and TKA. The cost savings significantly outweighs the added expense of the program. Providers participating in alternative payment models should consider using a NNP to provide quality arthroplasty care at a reduced cost.

Perioperative Telephone Encounters Should Be Included in the Relative Value Scale Update Committee Review of Time Spent on Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Providing care for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty requires substantial effort beyond the actual replacement surgery to ensure a safe, clinical, and economically effective outcome. Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has stated that the procedural codes for total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are potentially misvalued and has asked for a review by the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC). The purpose of this study is to quantify one of the additional work efforts associated with telephone encounters during the perioperative episode of care. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all 47,841 telephone calls from patients to our office from 2015 to 2017 in a consecutive series of 3309 patients who underwent TKA and 3651 patients who underwent THA. We recorded reasons for communication, amount of communication, and the caller identity for both 30 days preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively. We then used the RUC Building Block Method to calculate the preservice and postservice work included in a review of the time and intensity of the codes for THA and TKA. RESULTS: The average number of preoperative patient calls per patient was 2.31 for TKA and 2.44 for THA, and the average number of postoperative calls was 5.01 for TKA and 4.00 for THA. The most common reasons for patient calls were perioperative care instructions, medications, medical clearance, paperwork/insurance, and complications. Using the RUC-approved work relative value units (wRVUs) assigned to each telephone encounter, an additional 1.83 wRVUs for perioperative telephone encounters for TKA and 1.61 for THA should be assigned. CONCLUSIONS: Providing patients with appropriate support during the arthroplasty episode of care requires substantial telephonic support, which should be acknowledged. As the RUC considers reviewing the time and intensity spent on perioperative care for patients undergoing THA and TKA, they should consider appropriately documenting the amount of work required for telephone communication.

A Novel, Synergistic Model in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Report of 2 Specialty Hospitals With Joint Ownership Between Physicians and Healthcare Systems.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Affordable Care Act introduced new restrictions on the expansion of physician-owned hospitals (POHs) due to concerns over financial incentives and increased costs. The purpose of this study is to determine whether joint ventures between tertiary care and specialty hospitals (SHs) allowing physician ownership (POHs) have improved outcomes and lower cost following THA and TKA. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of consecutive series of primary THA and TKA patients from 2015 to 2016 across a single institution comprised of 14 full-service hospitals and 2 SHs owned as a joint venture between physicians and their health system partners. Ninety-day episode-of-care claims cost data from Medicare and a single private insurer were reviewed with the collection of the same demographic data, medical comorbidities, and readmission rates for both the SHs and non-SHs. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effect of the SHs on episode-of-care costs. RESULTS: Of the 6537 patients in the study, 1936 patients underwent a total joint arthroplasty at an SH (29.6%). Patients undergoing a procedure at an SH had shorter lengths of stay (1.29 days vs 2.23 days for Medicare, 1.15 vs 1.86 for private payer, both P < .001), were less likely to be readmitted (4% vs 7% for Medicare, P = .001), and had lower mean 90-day episode-of-care costs ($16,661 vs $20,579 for Medicare, $26,166 vs $35,222 for private payers, both P < .001). When controlling for the medical comorbidities and demographic variables, undergoing THA or TKA at an SH was associated with a decrease in overall episode costs ($3266 for Medicare, $13,132 for private payer, both P < .001). CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for a healthier patient population, the joint venture partnership with health systems and physician-owned SHs demonstrated lower 90-day episode-of-care costs than non-SHs following THA and TKA. Policymakers and practices should consider these data when considering the current care pathways.

Aspirin Thromboprophylaxis Confers No Increased Risk for Aseptic Loosening Following Cementless Primary Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been shown to be a safe and cost-effective thromboprophylaxis agent with equivalent preventive efficacy to warfarin and fewer side-effects. However, animal studies have suggested delayed bone healing with aspirin and other inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis. The impact of aspirin on aseptic loosening following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) has yet to be explored. Our aim was to determine if patients receiving aspirin for thromboprophylaxis had higher rates of aseptic loosening vs patients receiving warfarin after THA. METHODS: We identified 11,262 consecutive primary uncemented THA performed between 2006 and 2017. Postoperatively, either warfarin (target international normalized ratio 1.5-2.0) or aspirin chemoprophylaxis were prescribed for 4 weeks. We recorded demographics, length of stay, body mass index, preoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use, and Elixhauser comorbidity index. All revisions because of aseptic loosening within 1 year of the index procedure were identified radiographically, confirmed intraoperatively, and did not fulfill Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic infection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: There was no difference (P = .14) in the rates of revision for aseptic loosening between patients in the aspirin cohort (14/4530; 0.31%; P = .14) and the warfarin cohort (36/6682; 0.54%). After accounting for confounding variables, no significant difference was noted in aseptic loosening rates between patients treated with aspirin vs those treated with warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; P = .11). Perioperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug was not significantly associated with aseptic loosening (adjusted odds ratio 1.20; P = .67). CONCLUSION: While multiple agents are available for venous thromboprophylaxis, there is increasing evidence in favor of the use of aspirin. This study allays the notion that aspirin increases the rates of aseptic loosening following uncemented hip arthroplasty.

Inadequate Glycemic Control Is Associated With Increased Surgical Site Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between inadequate glycemic control and surgical site infection (SSI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between perioperative glycemic control and the risk for SSI, mainly periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science from inception up to June 2017. The main independent variable was glycemic control as defined by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) or perioperative glucose values. The main outcome was SSI. Publication year, location, study design, sample population (size, age, gender), procedure, glycemic control assessment, infection outcome, results, confounders, and limitations were assessed. Studies included in the meta-analysis had stratified glycemic control using a distinct HbA1C cut-off. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in this study. Meta-analysis of 10 studies suggested that elevated HbA1C levels were associated with a higher risk of SSI after TJA (pooled odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.94-2.37, P = .09) with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 81.32%, P < .0001). In a subgroup analysis of studies considering HbA1C with a cut-off of 7% as uncontrolled, this association was no longer noticed (P = .50). All 5 studies that specifically assessed for SSI and perioperative hyperglycemia showed a significant association, which was usually attenuated after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Inadequate glycemic control was associated with increased risk for SSI after TJA. However, the optimal HbA1C threshold remains contentious. Pooled data does not support the conventional 7% cut-off for risk stratification. Future studies should examine new markers for determining adequate glycemic control.

Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Is a Favorable Treatment Option Upon Diagnosis of a Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prevalence of medical comorbidities, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in patients with fungal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: All patients with fungal PJI treated from 1999 to 2014 were retrospectively identified at a single institution. Demographic data, comorbidity, and surgical variables were obtained from medical records. Patients were followed up for at least 2 years. PJI was diagnosed using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Treatment success was defined using the Delphi consensus criteria. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves with 95% confidence interval were used for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, fungal PJIs accounted for 2.4% of the PJI treated at our institution. Twenty-seven patients (93.1%) had 2 or more underlying systemic illnesses. Age and revision surgery were significant risk factors for development of fungal PJI after adjusting for confounding variables. Overall treatment success was 55.2% at 1 year and 40.5% at 5 years. When stratified by initial surgical management, treatment success was 57.1% at 1 year and 28.6% at 5 years following irrigation and debridement; 33.3% at 1 year and 5 years following 1-stage revision; and 57.9% at 1 year and 46.3% at 5 years for 2-stage exchange arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Patients with fungal PJI have a high prevalence of systemic illness and poor outcome after surgical management. Irrigation and debridement and single-stage revision demonstrate poor longterm outcomes and may have no place as treatment choices for fungal PJI. Moving forward, our efforts should concentrate on optimizing the systemic status of these patients prior to 2-stage exchange arthroplasty.