Robotic-Assisted Proctosigmoidectomy vs. Laparoscopic-Assisted Soave Pull-Through for Hirschsprung's Disease: Medium-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy (RAP) and laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through (LAP) for children with Hirschsprung's disease (HD). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: LAP and RAP have been developed for minimally invasive pull-through of HD, but the clinical benefits of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted approaches have yet to be proven in a multicenter prospective study. METHODS: This study was a prospective multicenter clinical trial conducted on children with rectosigmoid/descending HD from July 2015 to June 2022, with registration in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000035220). The primary outcome was the medium-term functional outcomes in children aged ≥4 years based on bowel functional scores, which were assessed and compared between LAP and RAP. RESULTS: A total of 328 consecutive patients (RAP=165, LAP=163) were approached who were considered eligible for elective minimally invasive endorectal pull-through, and 219 patients aged ≥4 years of age completed follow-up (RAP=109, LAP=110). The transanal dissection length and anal traction time were significantly shorter in RAP than those in LAP (0.30 cm vs. 3.70 cm, P <0.001; 45 min vs. 62 min, P <0.001). The RAP group had significantly lower urinary retention rate (0% vs. 5.52%, P=0.006), while other short-term results between two groups were not significantly different. The medium-term overall BFS scores were comparable between two groups; however, among the subgroup of children aged ≤ 3 months at surgery, the RAP group had better anal canal resting pressure at one year postoperatively and amounted to better annual POFC scores at 4-7 years old postoperatively (all P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RAP and LAP should have similar medium-term bowel functional outcomes in HD children, but RAP may be associated with a slight functional benefit in infants operated on below age 3 months, requiring further investigation in larger case cohorts.

Robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy (RAKPE) has been utilized to treat biliary atresia (BA). However, RAKPE is not widely performed and its efficacy remains unknown. We summarized the experience of RAKPE for BA and determined its efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 25 consecutive infants with non-syndromic type III BA who received RAKPE in our center from January 2020 to July 2021. RAKPE is a three-arm setup and four-trocar operation. Bipolar coagulation was used to dissect the small blood vessels at the hepatic portal. The fibrous cone was shallowly transected with bending electric scissors, followed by gelatin sponge compression to staunch the hemorrhage. Finally, a wide anastomosis was accurately constructed. Demographics and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 211.64 ± 18.93 min. No conversion to laparotomy or intraoperative complications occurred. The mean estimated blood loss was 7.64 ± 2.43 mL. Enteral feeding was resumed after 3.44 ± 1.23 days. All patients achieved bile excretion postoperatively, and dark green bile-stained stools were passed 1.50 days (range 1.00-3.00 days) after surgery. The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 10.32 ± 2.59 days. The jaundice clearance (JC) rate was 76.00% within 6 months after surgery and the incidence of cholangitis was 48.00% within 1 year following surgery. The survival with native liver (SNL) rate was 80.00% at 1 year and 66.67% at 2 years. CONCLUSION: RAKPE can be regarded as a treatment option for patients with BA due to the good outcomes reported. However, long-term studies comparing open or laparoscopic approaches are needed.

Robotic-assisted choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children: does age matter?

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is being increasingly used in pediatric choledochal cysts (CCs), but is most commonly performed in older children and adolescents. The outcomes in young infants remain to be explored. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in infants aged ≤ 1 year with an older cohort. METHODS: From July 2015 to January 2020, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the RAS in patients with CCs at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups (group A ≤ 1 year old and group B > 1 year old). Demographics, intraoperative details, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included in the study (28 patients in group A and 51patients in group B). The median age of patients at the surgery in group A was 4.9 months (IQR: 3.1-9.1), compared with 46.8 months (IQR: 28.5-86.5) in group B. Three patients in group A were neonates. No conversion to open surgery was required. No significant differences were found between the two groups including sex, Todani type, or diameter of the cysts. The diameter of the common hepatic duct was smaller in group A (6.0 ± 1.7 vs. 9.0 ± 3.0 mm; p < 0.001). Group A had the longer hepaticojejunostomy time [51(44-58) vs. 42(38-53) min; p = 0.013], while Group B had the longer cyst excision time [43(41-59) vs. 50(43-60) min; p = 0.005]. However, their total operative time and console time were similar. There were no statistical differences in length of hospital stay and complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted cyst resection and hepaticojejunostomy are feasible and safe in infants ≤ 1 year old. Age cannot be considered an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery in patients with CCs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex pediatric surgical conditions.

BACKGROUND: Robotics has been used safely and successfully in a variety of adult surgeries and is gradually gaining ground in pediatrics. While the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery in disease treatment are well recognized, its high cost has led to questions. To investigate whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is cost-effective compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) in pediatric surgery, we attempted to construct a model to perform an analysis of these two surgical approaches using Python statistical analysis software. METHODS: We selected four common complex pediatric surgical conditions (choledochal cyst, Hirschsprung's disease, vesicoureteral reflux, and congenital hydronephrosis) from three systems (pediatric hepatobiliary, gastroenterology, and urology). Models were constructed using Python statistical software to compare hospital costs and surgical outcomes for RALS and LS. In addition, we performed a preferred strategy analysis for both surgical modalities while assessing model uncertainty using one-way sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: For the four diseases, the operative time decreased sequentially. The total inpatient costs of RALS were 10,816.72, 9145.44, 8414.29, 7973.58 dollars, respectively, yielding 1.789, 1.712, 1.749, 1.792 quality adjustment life years (QALYs) over two years post-operatively. The incremental cost of RALS relative to LS for each disease was 3523.44, 3200.20, 3049.79, 3043.66 dollars, respectively, with an incremental utility of 0.060, 0.054, 0.051, 0.050 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for RALS for each of the four diseases were 58,724.01, 59,262.95, 59,799.79, 60,873.20 dollars/QALY, all less than 100,000 dollars/QALY. The cost of robot consumables was the main incremental cost of RALS and had the most significant impact on the model. CONCLUSION: For the four pediatric surgical conditions described above, RALS has higher inpatient costs than LS, but it has better postoperative outcomes, and all four RALS treatments are cost-effective. Children with complex diseases and long operative times appear to benefit more from RALS.

Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid advancement of robotic surgery across various surgical domains, only cases of robotic repair (RR) for neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) have been reported. Comprehensive studies comparing RR and thoracoscopic repair (TR) are lacking. The authors aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RR and TR for EA. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 155 EA neonates undergoing RR (79 patients) or TR (76 patients) between August 2020 and February 2023 using propensity score matching. Asymmetric port distribution and step-trocar insertion techniques were applied during RR. Demographics and surgical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: After matching, 63 patients (out of 79) in RR group and 63 patients (out of 76) in TR group were included. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between two groups, except for longer total operative time (173.81 vs. 160.54 min; P <0.001) and shorter anastomotic time (29.52 vs. 40.21 min; P <0.001) in RR group. Compared with TR group, the RR group had older age at surgery (8.00 vs. 3.00 days; P <0.001), but a comparable pneumonia rate. More importantly, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (4.76 vs. 19.05%, P =0.013), anastomotic stricture (15.87 vs. 31.74%, P =0.036) within 1 year postoperatively, and unplanned readmission (32.26 vs. 60.00%, P =0.030) within 2 years postoperatively were lower in RR group than in TR group. CONCLUSIONS: RR is a technically safe and effective option for EA patients. This approach delays the age of surgery without increasing respiratory complication rates while reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications and unplanned readmission.

Robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung's disease: A multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a cutting-edge minimally invasive technique that overcomes many shortcomings of laparoscopic techniques, yet few studies have evaluated the use of robotic surgery to treat Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). AIM: To analyze the feasibility and medium-term outcomes of robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy (RAPS) with sphincter- and nerve-sparing surgery in HSCR patients. METHODS: From July 2015 to January 2022, 156 rectosigmoid HSCR patients were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study. Their sphincters and nerves were spared by dissecting the rectum completely from the pelvic cavity outside the longitudinal muscle of the rectum and then performing transanal Soave pull-through procedures. Surgical outcomes and continence function were analyzed. RESULTS: No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The median age at surgery was 9.50 months, and the length of the removed bowel was 15.50 ± 5.23 cm. The total operation time, console time, and anal traction time were 155.22 ± 16.77, 58.01 ± 7.71, and 45.28 ± 8.15 min. There were 25 complications within 30 d and 48 post-30-d complications. For children aged ≥ 4 years, the bowel function score (BFS) was 17.32 ± 2.63, and 90.91% of patients showed moderate-to-good bowel function. The postoperative fecal continence (POFC) score was 10.95 ± 1.04 at 4 years of age, 11.48 ± 0.72 at 5 years of age, and 11.94 ± 0.81 at 6 years of age, showing a promising annual trend. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, BFS, and POFC scores related to age at surgery being ≤ 3 mo or > 3 mo. CONCLUSION: RAPS is a safe and effective alternative for treating HSCR in children of all ages; it offers the advantage of further minimizing damage to sphincters and perirectal nerves and thus providing better continence function.

The interplay of common genetic variants NRG1 rs2439302 and RET rs2435357 increases the risk of developing Hirschsprung's disease.

Introduction: As a congenital and genetically related disease, many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported to be associated with the risk of HSCR. Our previous research showed that SNP rs2439302 (NRG1) interacted with rs2435357 (RET) to increase the risk of HSCR development. However, the underlying molecular mechanism is still not well understood. Methods: SNP rs2439302 (NRG1) and rs2435357 (RET) were genotyped in 470 HSCR cases. The expression of NRG1 and RET was investigated in the colon of HSCR patients. Knockdown of the NRG1 and RET homologs was performed in zebrafish to investigate their synergistic effect on ENS development. The effect of SNP rs2439302 and rs2435357 polymorphism on neuron proliferation, migration, and differentiation were investigated in SHSY-5Y cells and IPSCs. Results: Significant downregulation of NRG1 and RET expression was noticed in the aganglionic segment of HSCR patients and SHSY-5Y cells with rs2439302 GG/rs2435357 TT genotype. NRG1 and RET double mutants caused the most severe reduction in enteric neuron numbers than NRG1 single mutant or RET single mutant in the hindgut of zebrafish. SHSY-5Y cells and IPSCs with rs2439302 GG/rs2435357 TT genotype exhibited a decreased proliferative, migration, and differentiative capacity. CTCF showed a considerably higher binding ability to SNP rs2439302 CC than GG. NRG1 reduction caused a further decrease in SOX10 expression via the PI3K/Akt pathway, which regulates RET expression by directly binding to rs2435357. Discussion: SNP rs2439302 (NRG1) GG increases the risk of developing HSCR by affecting the binding of transcription factor CTCF and interacting with rs2435357 (RET) to regulate RET expression via the PI3K/Akt/SOX10 pathway.

Re-evaluation of Laparoscopic Hepatic Subcapsular Spider-Like Telangiectasis Sign: A Highly Accurate Method to Diagnose Biliary Atresia in Infants.

Objective: Operative cholangiography, the gold standard for the diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA), is being challenged due to an increase in the studies of misdiagnosis. A previous study has shown that the laparoscopic hepatic subcapsular spider-like telangiectasis (HSST) sign was accurate for diagnosing BA. This study aims to compare the performance of the HSST sign with cholangiography in the identification of BA. Methods: We prospectively screened consecutive infants with cholestasis who underwent laparoscopic exploration in this multicenter study. Demographics, intraoperative findings (videos and images), and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The data of the HSST sign and cholangiography were compared according to the final diagnosis. Then, the diagnostic accuracy of the BA using the HSST sign and cholangiography was validated in other independent cohorts. Results: A total of 2,216 patients were enrolled in this study. The sensitivity and negative predictive values were both 100% for diagnosing BA based on the HSST sign and cholangiography. The specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the HSST sign (97.2, 99.2, 99.3%) in discriminating BA were significantly higher than operative cholangiography (81.6, 94.9, 95.8; p < 0.001). Moreover, to realize the early diagnosis of BA, the accuracy of the HSST sign in identifying BA was better than cholangiography in the subgroup of neonates (98.7% vs. 95.0%; p = 0.032). Interestingly, 92 non-BA patients without the HSST sign had positive cholangiography. Among them, 28 infants had negative cholangiography when the common bile duct was compressed and 39 patients displayed visible bile ducts due to repeated postoperative biliary irrigation. The other 25 patients (18 with the Alagille syndrome, 5 with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, and 2 with the neonatal hepatitis syndrome) had consistently positive cholangiography. In the independent validation cohort, the diagnostic accuracy of the HSST sign (99.2%) was higher than cholangiography (95.0%, p = 0.012). Conclusion: The laparoscopic HSST sign is superior to cholangiography in the diagnosis of BA in the infants with cholestasis and has advantages in early diagnosis. This method is expected to become a novel shift for diagnosing BA during ongoing laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias (IHs) are sometimes encountered incidentally in children during laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children. METHODS: A multicentric study was performed in patients with AA and concurrent IH who received laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy (study group), compared with patients who underwent two-stage laparoscopic procedures (control group) between September 2012 and January 2020. Intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 189 patients with AA and concurrent IH (117 children in the study group, and 72 children in the control group) were enrolled. No significant differences in preoperative characteristics were identified between the two groups. Patients in the study group had a shorter total operative time and hospital stay than those in the control group (43.2 ±â€¯8.1 vs 53.9 ±â€¯7.3 min, p < 0.001; 1.5 ±â€¯0.8 vs 2.2 ±â€¯0.9 days, p = 0.023). The study group incurred lower costs than the control group (9198.7 ±â€¯587.6 vs 14,392.5 ±â€¯628.6 RMB, p < 0.001). During follow-up (range 1.5-6.0 years), three children in the study group and two children in the control group experienced wound infection. One child in the study group had recurrent IH. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic simultaneous procedures do not increase the incidence of wound infection or recurrent IH. Moreover, they avoid repeat anesthesia and hospitalization. Therefore, this approach is safe, feasible and cost-effective for children with AA and concurrent IH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.