Aerobic fitness impacts sympathoadrenal axis responses to concurrent challenges.

The combination of mental and physical challenges can elicit exacerbated cardiorespiratory (CR) and catecholamine responses above that of a single challenge alone. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of a combination of acute mental challenges and physical stress on cardiorespiratory and catecholamine responses. METHOD: Eight below-average fitness (LF VO2max = 36.58 ± 3.36 ml-1 kg-1 min-1) and eight above-average fitness (HF VO2max = 51.18 ± 2.09 ml-1 kg-1 min-1) participants completed an exercise-alone condition (EAC) session consisting of moderate-intensity cycling at 60% VO2max for 37 min, and a dual-challenge condition (DCC) that included concurrent participation in mental challenges while cycling. RESULT: The DCC resulted in increases in perceived workload, CR, epinephrine, and norepinephrine responses overall. HF participants had greater absolute CR and catecholamine responses compared to LF participants and quicker HR recovery after the dual challenge. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that cardiorespiratory fitness does impact the effect of concurrent stressors on CR and catecholamine responses.

Pilot Study Examining the Effects of Atropine on Performance during Uncompensable Heat Stress.

UNLABELLED: In many operational scenarios, hypohydration can be corrected with oral rehydration following the work interval. Although rare, there are potential situations that require extended intervals of uncompensable heat stress exposure while working in personal protective equipment (PPE). Under these conditions, retention of body water may be valuable to preserve work capacity and reduce cardiovascular strain. We conducted a pilot study comparing intramuscular atropine sulfate versus saline placebo to establish the safety profile of the protocol and to provide pilot data for future investigations. Five, healthy, heat-acclimated subjects completed this crossover design laboratory study. Each subject performed up to one hour of exertion in a hot environment while wearing a chemical resistant coverall. Atropine sulfate (0.02 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of sterile saline was administered by intramuscular injection. Core temperature, heart rate, perceptual measures, and changes in body mass were measured. All five subjects completed the acclimation period and both protocols. No adverse events occurred, and no pharmacologically induced delirium was identified. Change in body mass was less following exercise influenced by atropine sulfate (p = 0.002). Exertion time tended to be longer in the atropine sulfate arm (p = 0.08). Other measures appeared similar between groups. Intramuscular atropine sulfate reduced sweating and tended to increase the work interval under uncompensable heat stress when compared to saline placebo. Heart rate and temperature changes during exertion were similar in both conditions suggesting that the influence of an anticholinergic agent on thermoregulation may be minimal during uncompensable heat stress. KEY WORDS: thermoregulation; cholinolytic; anticholinergic; reaction time.

Work duration does not affect cortisol output in experienced firefighters performing live burn drills.

Work duration may affect firefighters' stress responses. Forty-two firefighters (38 males) performed either 2 (SWD) or 3 (LWD) bouts of simulated fire suppression activity. Salivary cortisol, self-reported fear and anxiety, and perceptual thermal responses were measured. Cortisol was evaluated using area-under-the-curve calculations (Pruessner et al., 2003). Affective responses between the two conditions were compared using T-tests. Pearson product moment correlations were used to analyze the relationships between affect and change in thermal load perception. Cortisol decreased across the protocol in both groups, and no difference was found in cortisol or affect between the groups. Cortisol decreased (F4,36 = 3.43, p < 0.05) in the SWD group from a mean concentration of 40.93 ± 11.41 nmol/L to 25.07 ± 9.88 nmol/L at the end of the protocol. In the LWD group, the mean cortisol concentration decreased from 42.89 ± 11.83 to 25.07 ± 8.82 at the end of the protocol (F5,50 = 14.77, p < 0.01). Anxiety increased in the LWD (F4,72 = 5.11, p = 0.001) but not the SWD group. Fear increased in the SWD (F3,48 = 14.15, p < 0.001) and LWD group (F4,60 = 4.47, p < 0.01). The present findings suggests a moderate fear load with firefighting, which appears not to be associated with duration of work bout. Examination of more varied work bout lengths may reveal an association between anxiety and work duration. However, the work bout durations investigated in the current study comprise the range of what is practical from an occupational standpoint and the physiological capabilities of the firefighters.

Aerobic fitness affects cortisol responses to concurrent challenges.

PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated that a combination of mental and physical challenge can elicit exacerbated state anxiety, effort sense, and cortisol responses above that of a single stimulus. However, an analysis of the effects of aerobic fitness on the responses of cortisol to concurrent mental and physical stress between below average and above average fitness individuals has not been conducted. This study examined the effects of a combination of acute mental challenges and physical stress on psychological and cortisol responses between eight individuals of below average fitness (low fit (LF), VO2max = 36.58 ± 3.36 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) and eight individuals of above average fitness (high fit (HF), VO2max = 51.18 ± 2.09 mL·kg(-1)·min). METHODS: All participants completed two experimental conditions. An exercise-alone condition (EAC) consisted of cycling at 60% VO2max for 37 min, and a dual-challenge condition (DCC) included concurrent participation in a mental challenge for 20 min while cycling. RESULTS: The DCC resulted in increases in state anxiety (P = 0.018), perceived overall workload (P = 0.001), and exacerbated cortisol responses (P = 0.04). Furthermore, LF participants had a greater overall cortisol response in the DCC compared with the EAC (DCC = 346.83 ± 226.92; EAC = -267.46 ± 132.32; t7 = 2.49, P = 0.04), whereas HF participants demonstrated no difference between conditions (DCC = 38.91 ± 147.01; EAC = -324.60 ± 182.78; t7 = 1.68, P = 0.14). DISCUSSION: LF individuals seem to demonstrate unnecessary and unfavorable responses to the DCC compared with HF individuals, particularly concerning cortisol. The exacerbated cortisol responses in LF individuals have implications for harmful consequences such as increased risk of cardiovascular disease.