Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 1096, 2024 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39358697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization increases the risk of MRSA infection. Detecting MRSA colonization can influence postoperative outcomes and prolong hospital stay. The conventional standard culture method for detecting MRSA colonization has limitations in terms of sensitivity and turnaround time. Hence, we sought out use of Xpert PCR kit for prompt evaluation of MRSA colonization to support MRSA prevention in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 1st April-31st December 2022, 290 nasal and skin swab samples were collected from 257 patients and processed using routine culture (as gold standard method) and PCR-based MRSA detection assay (MRSA Xpert). RESULTS: A total of two hundred and ninety (290) swab samples from 257 patients were obtained, 33 of which were paired. The overall prevalence of MRSA colonization was 12% by both methods, with 90% of cases classified as community-associated (CA-MRSA) whereas 10% as hospital-acquired (HA-MRSA). The colonized group showed a higher subsequent MRSA infection rate (11% vs. 3.5%) compared to the noncolonized group. Culture identified 11% of screening samples as MRSA positive, Xpert MRSA assay showed 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The cost of a single MRSA Xpert assay was $50 while MRSA culture cost around $7.50. CONCLUSION: Our study findings suggest that the presence of MRSA colonization in our cohort of patients is consistent with the existing trends in hospital epidemiology. Both conventional culture and Xpert MRSA methods showed comparable efficacy for detection of MRSA colonization. Larger-scale studies are recommended to validate these findings conclusively.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Adulto Jovem , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Idoso , Adolescente , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Prevalência
2.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 770, 2023 Oct 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There are reports of a potential rise in a teaching hospital's morbidity and mortality rates during the trainee turnover period, i.e., with the induction of new residents and house staffs, and the changeover of clinical teams. The published literature displays mixed reports on this topic with lack of reproducible observations. The current study was conducted to explore existence of any such phenomenon (January effect) in Pakistan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Five-year (2013-2018) record of all the patients in all age groups related to these outcomes was retrieved and recorded in specifically designed questionnaire. Different outcome measures were used as indicators of patient care and change in these outcomes at the time of new induction was related to possible January effect. RESULTS: During the five-year study period, more than 1100 new trainees were inducted into the post graduate medical education program (average of 237 per year) with more than 22,000 inpatient admissions (average of 45,469 per year). Some patterns were observed in frequencies of surgical site infections, medication errors, sentinel events, patient complaints, and adverse drug reactions. However, these were not consistently reproducible and could not be directly attributed to the trainee turnover. All other indicators did not show any pattern and were considered inconclusive. No effect of overlap was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistency in the patient care quality indicators do not favor existence of January effect in our study. Further research is recommended to establish our results.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Paquistão , Hospitais Universitários
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(7): 819-826, 2024 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336128

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) pose a significant risk to critically ill patients, particularly in intensive care units (ICU), and are a significant cause of hospital-acquired infections. We investigated whether implementation of a multifaceted intervention was associated with reduced incidence of CLABSIs. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study over nine years. We implemented a bundled intervention approach to prevent CLABSIs, consisting of a comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP). The program was implemented in the Neonatal ICU, Medical ICU, and Surgical ICU departments at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Pakistan. RESULTS: The three intervention ICUs combined were associated with an overall 36% reduction in CLABSI rates and a sustained reduction in CLABSI rates for > a year (5 quarters). The Neonatal ICU experienced a decrease of 77% in CLABSI rates lasting ∼1 year (4 quarters). An attendance rate above 88% across all stakeholder groups in each CUSP meeting correlated with a better and more sustained infection reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our multifaceted approach using the CUSP model was associated with reduced CLABSI-associated morbidity and mortality in resource-limited settings. Our findings suggest that a higher attendance rate (>85%) at meetings may be necessary to achieve sustained effects post-intervention.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Controle de Infecções , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Incidência , Países em Desenvolvimento , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Sepse/epidemiologia
4.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 11: 2150132720943331, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686571

RESUMO

The experiences of these recent months have left us with as many new questions as they have given us new solutions. The main question that infection prevention and control department is having these days is "Why have hospital-associated infections (HAIs) reduced during COVID-19 pandemic?" What is the one unique strategy that has brought decline in increasing HAIs? Would it be appropriate to say that rigorous hand hygiene practices among health care workers (HCWs) have reduced HAIs in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan? This commentary is written to understand the effect of rigorous hand hygiene among HCWs on number of HAIs during COVID-19 pandemic. Given the seriousness of this outbreak, it was observed that the hand hygiene has occupied a new place of importance in the minds of HCWs. We observed 4 times increase in the consumption of hand sanitizers after COVID-19 outbreak. The increased consumption of hand sanitizers was reflected in improved hand hygiene practices. A reduction was observed in the number of HAIs after the COVID-19 outbreak, and we assume that the dip in HAIs is associated with the improvement in hand hygiene practices in the recent months. In the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, these trends reassure us that hand hygiene compliance by HCWs alone can be effective in reducing HAIs in a hospital setting.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Higiene das Mãos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , COVID-19 , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Centros de Atenção Terciária
5.
J Infect Prev ; 21(5): 189-195, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: From September 2014, a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, started diagnosing 3-5 cases/month of a yeast locally identified as Saccharomyces spp. resistant to fluconazole. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified the isolates as Candida auris. The Pakistan Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (FELTP) and the hospital investigated the outbreak from April 2015 to January 2016. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the outbreak investigation was to determine the risk factors and to inform measures to limit the spread of the organism in the hospital. METHODS: Medical records, nursing schedules and infection control practices were reviewed. Sixty-two age- and sex-matched hospital controls from the same wards were identified. RESULTS: Thirty cases (17 males) were identified (mean age = 51.6 years, age range = 2-91 years), case fatality was 53%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that a history of surgery within 90 days of diagnosis, admission to the emergency department and history of chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with C. auris infection. DISCUSSION: This is the report of the outbreak investigation that triggered a global exploration of C. auris as a newly identified multidrug-resistant nosocomial organism, spreading within the hospital, especially among patients with invasive procedures. Unfortunately, we could not identify any specific source of the outbreak nor stop the transmission of the organism.

6.
Artigo em Inglês | WHOLIS | ID: who-170996

RESUMO

A medical chart review was carried out in an ambulatory family medical clinic attached to the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. The study revealed that all febrile patients the mean fever spike was 39.8°C. The common symptoms were bodyache (46%), nausea (12%) and headache (10%). Other clinical findings were eye pain, backache and anorexia. Out of thirteen patients who had dengue IgM done, nine showed positive results. In laboratory examination, thrombocytopenia was found in 53.4% of patients. Low haemoglobin was found in 51% and leucopenia in 32.9% of patients.


Assuntos
Dengue , Assistência Ambulatorial , Paquistão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa