RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Buprenorphine is a Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for opioid use disorder, with proven efficacy in treatment retention and reduction in opioid use and mortality. Low-dose buprenorphine initiation or microinduction is a novel means of initiation that may allow for an easier transition in patients. Trauma patients have high rates of opioid use disorder and patient directed discharges (PDD). We hypothesized that patients initiated on a buprenorphine microinduction program would have increased protocol completion and fewer PDD compared with patients initiated historically on a traditional induction. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study compared buprenorphine microinduction and traditional induction in trauma patients at an urban level one trauma center between December 2020 and June 2022. Patients aged 18-89 y with traumatic injuries who received buprenorphine were included. Our primary outcome was in-hospital protocol completion, defined as reaching 16 mg of buprenorphine within 24 h or a documented stable dose. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square for categorical variables and two sample t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included, with 46 initiating with microinduction and 52 initiating with traditional induction. There was no difference in protocol completion, (P = 0.29) and 83% of subjects who started an induction protocol completed it. Those who completed a protocol were more likely to be discharged home (P = 0.0002), had less PDD (P = 0.001), and had an increased likelihood of attending outpatient addiction clinic follow-up (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the protocol type, buprenorphine induction can be implemented in trauma patients with high protocol completion rates. In our population, those who complete a protocol had a higher likelihood of discharge home and postdischarge follow-up in addiction medicine clinic.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Buprenorfina/administração & dosagem , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Idoso , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adolescente , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Medical ultrasonography was first used as a diagnostic tool in 1942 by Theodore Karl Dussik to visualize brain structures. Use of ultrasonography broadened to the field of obstetrics in the 1950s and has since expanded to many other medical special-ties owing to ease of use, reproducibility, low cost, and lack of radiation. Advancements in ultrasonography technology have allowed clinicians to perform procedures with greater accuracy and to characterize tissue better than ever before. Piezoelectric crystals used to produce ultrasound waves have been replaced by silicon chips; artificial intelligence can be used to mitigate user variability; and more portable ultrasound probes are available for use with mobile devices. Ultrasonography requires training to be used appropriately, and patient and family education are crucial when performing an examination. Although some data are available regarding the amount of training needed for users to reach proficiency, this topic remains controversial and no standard currently exists.