Impact of daratumumab/bortezomib/thalidomide and dexamethasone induction therapy on chemo-free stem cell mobilization in transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a multicentre real-world experience.

Not available.

Molecular-Biology-Driven Frontline Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently relies on the use of chemo-immunotherapy, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or BCL2 inhibitors alone or combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. However, the availability of multiple choices for the first-line setting and a lack of direct head-to-head comparisons pose a challenge for treatment selection. To overcome these limitations, we performed a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on published randomized clinical trials performed in the first-line treatment setting of CLL. For each study, we retrieved data on progression-free survival (according to del17/P53 and IGHV status), overall response rate, complete response, and incidence of most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event. We identified nine clinical trials encompassing 11 different treatments, with a total of 5288 CLL patients evaluated. We systematically performed separated network meta-analyses (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy/safety of each regimen in the conditions previously described to obtain the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score, which was subsequently used to build separated ranking charts. Interestingly, the combination of obinutuzumab with acalabrutinib reached the top of the chart in each sub-analysis performed, with the exception of the del17/P53mut setting, where it was almost on par with the aCD20 mAbs/ibrutinib combination (SUCRA aCD20-ibrutinib and O-acala: 93.5% and 91%, respectively) and of the safety evaluation, where monotherapies (acalabrutinib in particular) gave better results. Finally, considering that NMA and SUCRA work for single endpoints only, we performed a principal component analysis to recapitulate in a cartesian plane the SUCRA profiles of each schedule according to the results obtained in each sub-analysis, confirming again the superiority of aCD20/BTKi or BCL2i combinations in a first-line setting. Overall, here we demonstrated that: (1) a chemotherapy-free regimen, such as the combination of aCD20 with a BTKi or BCL2i, should be the preferred treatment choice despite biological/molecular characteristics (preferred regimen O-acala); (2) there is less and less room for chemotherapy in the first line treatment of CLL.

Ferritin Metabolism Reflects Multiple Myeloma Microenvironment and Predicts Patient Outcome.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy with a multistep evolutionary pattern, in which the pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironment and genomic instability drive tumor evolution. MM microenvironment is rich in iron, released by pro-inflammatory cells from ferritin macromolecules, which contributes to ROS production and cellular damage. In this study, we showed that ferritin increases from indolent to active gammopathies and that patients with low serum ferritin had longer first line PFS (42.6 vs. 20.7 months and, p = 0.047, respectively) and OS (NR vs. 75.1 months and p = 0.029, respectively). Moreover, ferritin levels correlated with systemic inflammation markers and with the presence of a specific bone marrow cell microenvironment (including increased MM cell infiltration). Finally, we verified by bioinformatic approaches in large transcriptomic and single cell datasets that a gene expression signature associated with ferritin biosynthesis correlated with worse outcome, MM cell proliferation, and specific immune cell profiles. Overall, we provide evidence of the role of ferritin as a predictive/prognostic factor in MM, setting the stage for future translational studies investigating ferritin and iron chelation as new targets for improving MM patient outcome.

Isolated Nodal TBC Reactivation in a Patient with Post-Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ruxolitinib side effects include the most frequent hematological toxicity along with a more recently evidenced immunosuppressive activity, interfering both with the innate and adaptive immunity, and several cases of reactivation of latent infections by opportunistic agents in patients in treatment with ruxolitinib have been published in the last years. Several pathophysiological mechanisms may explain an association between ruxolitinib and opportunistic infections. From what we know, the only case of an isolated lymph node TBC reactivation in a ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis (MF) patient was reported by Patil et al. in 2016 [Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(3):1]. Other 10 cases describing TBC reactivations in MF patients assuming ruxolitinib and successfully treated with 4-drug anti-TBC therapy are available in the literature to date. The case we reported describes an isolated lymph nodal TBC reactivation in a patient with the diagnosis of post-essential thrombocythemia-MF during ruxolitinib treatment after a long course of interferon-a (IFN-α2b) assumed for the previous diagnosis of ET. The case we report teaches that lymphadenopathy with or without constitutional symptoms developing during ruxolitinib therapy should be considered as a possible manifestation of a TBC reactivation in patients with a previous positive TBC-exposure test. In these cases, Ziel-Nielsen testing on urine and sputum has to be performed to rule out infectiousness and eventually isolate the patient. Moreover, previous long-time exposition to IFN-α2b may be related with a higher risk for TBC reactivation in these subset of patients. We encourage reevaluation of the cohorts of patients treated with ruxolitinib in previous and current large prospective studies to study the possible correlation between previous exposition to IFN-α2b and TBC reactivation.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Refractory acute myeloid leukaemia is very difficult to treat and represents an unmet clinical need. In recent years, new drugs and combinations of drugs have been tested in this category, with encouraging results. However, all treated patients relapsed and died from the disease. The only curative option is allogeneic transplantation through a graft from a healthy donor immune system. Using myeloablative conditioning regimens, the median overall survival regimens is 19%. Several so-called sequential induction chemotherapies followed by allogeneic transplantation conditioned by reduced intensity regimens have been developed, improving the overall survival to 25-57%. In the allogeneic transplantation field, continuous improvements in practices, particularly regarding graft versus host disease prevention, infection prevention, and treatment, have allowed us to observe improvements in survival rates. This is true mainly for patients in complete remission before transplantation and less so for refractory patients. However, full myeloablative regimens are toxic and carry a high risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review, we describe the results obtained with the different modalities used in more recent retrospective and prospective studies. Based on these findings, we speculate how allogeneic stem cell transplantation could be modified to maximise its therapeutic effect on refractory acute myeloid leukaemia.

Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with FLT3+ AML receiving midostaurin during induction and consolidation: a retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse is the main cause of death after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). In AML FLT3+, it was shown that Sorafenib used as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT, significantly reduces the risk of relapse and death. Methods: We analyzed 29 adult patients with FLT3m AML and underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant from 2019 to 2023. All patients received midostaurin plus conventional CT during induction and consolidation. After transplantation, Sorafenib maintenance was administered in all patients independently from MRD status at transplantation. Results: Sorafenib maintenance was applied in 18 patients out 29 patients (62%). Median time to start sorafenib was 100 days (range 37-225) and median duration of treatment was 775 days (range 140-1064). For the whole population (n=29), 2-year OS, LFS, and CIR was 76%, 68% and 28%, respectively. The median time to relapse was 137 days (range 49-246). For patients treated with sorafenib (n=18), the 2-year OS, LFS, and CIR were 94%, 84% and 11%, respectively. For the whole population, the 100-day NRM was 0% and 1-year NRM was 3%. Death was caused by transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in 1 patient. For patients who were administered with Sorafenib, the 1-y NRM was 5%. Death was caused by transplant associated transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Discussion: This retrospective study suggests that sorafenib maintenance seem to be effective even in patients pre-treated with midostaurin.

Familial essential thrombocythemia: 6 cases from a mono-institutional series.

Rarely essential thrombocythemia (ET) is diagnosed in more than one person within a family. Familial myeloproliferative neoplasms are underdiagnosed. In this report, we describe 6 couples of familial ET, evaluating the heterogeneity of the mutational state and the clinical presentation.