RESUMO
Coal ash spills occasionally occur due to the accidental failure of surface impoundments, and toxic metal-laden ash can pose a serious health threat to adjacent aquatic ecosystems. Here, we performed an investigation into longitudinal variations of mercury (Hg) contamination in the Dan River (North Carolina, United States) about 17 and 29 months after a February 2014 coal ash spill incident, in which the reported Hg concentrations in the spilled coal ash (210 ng/g) were 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the river sediments (2-61 ng/g). We examined total Hg (THg) and methyl Hg (MeHg) in sediments from 0 to 65 km downstream of the spill, and found that most of the variations of THg and MeHg in surface sediments (0-16 cm) could be well accounted by the organic matter content and appeared to be not contaminated by Hg derived from coal ash. In examining MeHg bioaccumulation in invertebrates (aquatic and riparian) and fish in the Dan River and fish in a reservoir downstream of Dan River, we found no evidence of elevated MeHg bioaccumulation due to the 2014 coal ash spill. Thus, we concluded that Hg contamination from the coal ash spill is largely absent in the Dan River for both surface sediments and biota within the first three years of spill (until 2017), even though the majority of coal ash may be buried deeper in the sediment in the river channel and/or the downstream reservoir. Alternatively, the Hg associated with the coal ash is largely not bioavailable for extensive microbial Hg methylation. The findings provide useful insights into remediation strategies for this incident and other coal ash spills.
Assuntos
Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos , Cinza de Carvão/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Mercúrio/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Animais , Ecossistema , Peixes , Compostos de Metilmercúrio/análise , North Carolina , Rios , Estados Unidos , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidadeRESUMO
Several dinoflagellate strains of the genus Pfiesteria were isolated by culturing techniques from sediment samples taken in the Oslofjord region of Norway. Pfiesteria piscicida, well known as a fish killer from the Atlantic coast of America, was identified by genetic methods and light microscopy. The related species Pfiesteria shumwayae was attracted from the sediment by the presence of fish, and has proved toxic. This present survey demonstrates the wide distribution of these potentially harmful species, but so far they have not been connected with fish kills in Europe.
Assuntos
Dinoflagellida/isolamento & purificação , Pfiesteria piscicida/isolamento & purificação , Água do Mar/parasitologia , Animais , Oceano Atlântico , DNA de Protozoário/análise , DNA Ribossômico/análise , Dinoflagellida/classificação , Dinoflagellida/genética , Europa (Continente) , Noruega , Pfiesteria piscicida/classificação , Pfiesteria piscicida/genética , Filogenia , RNA Ribossômico 18S/análiseAssuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Cianobactérias/isolamento & purificação , Eutrofização , Toxinas Marinhas/análise , Microcistinas/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/normas , Toxinas Bacterianas/toxicidade , Cianobactérias/patogenicidade , Toxinas de Cianobactérias , Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Água Doce/análise , Água Doce/microbiologia , Humanos , Toxinas Marinhas/normas , Toxinas Marinhas/toxicidade , Microcistinas/normas , Microcistinas/toxicidade , Saúde Pública , Padrões de Referência , Medição de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This article brings forth recommendations from a workshop sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (EMAP) Programs and by the Council of State Governments, held during May 2002 in Kansas City, Kansas. The workshop assembled microbial ecologists and environmental scientists to determine what research and science is needed to bring existing molecular biological approaches and newer technologies arising from microbial genomic research into environmental monitoring and water quality assessments. Development of genomics and proteomics technologies for environmental science is a very new area having potential to improve environmental water quality assessments. The workshop participants noted that microbial ecologists are already using molecular biological methods well suited for monitoring and water quality assessments and anticipate that genomics-enabled technologies could be made available for monitoring within a decade. Recommendations arising from the workshop include needs for (i) identification of informative microbial gene sequences, (ii) improved understandings of linkages between indicator taxa, gene expression and environmental condition, (iii) technological advancements towards field application, and (iv) development of the appropriate databases.
Assuntos
Ecossistema , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Genômica , Microbiologia da Água , Animais , Eucariotos/genética , Eucariotos/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , RNA de Algas/análise , RNA de Algas/genética , Água do Mar/microbiologiaRESUMO
Molecular methods, including conventional PCR, real-time PCR, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, fluorescent fragment detection PCR, and fluorescent in situ hybridization, have all been developed for use in identifying and studying the distribution of the toxic dinoflagellates Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae. Application of the methods has demonstrated a worldwide distribution of both species and provided insight into their environmental tolerance range and temporal changes in distribution. Genetic variability among geographic locations generally appears low in rDNA genes, and detection of the organisms in ballast water is consistent with rapid dispersal or high gene flow among populations, but additional sequence data are needed to verify this hypothesis. The rapid development and application of these tools serves as a model for study of other microbial taxa and provides a basis for future development of tools that can simultaneously detect multiple targets.
Assuntos
Dinoflagellida/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas Genéticas , Pfiesteria piscicida/isolamento & purificação , Animais , DNA de Protozoário/análise , Dinoflagellida/classificação , Dinoflagellida/genética , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Pfiesteria piscicida/classificação , Pfiesteria piscicida/genética , Reação em Cadeia da PolimeraseRESUMO
Toxicity and its detection in the dinoflagellate fish predators Pfiesteria piscicida and Pfiesteria shumwayae depend on the strain and the use of reliable assays. Two assays, standardized fish bioassays (SFBs) with juvenile fish and fish microassays (FMAs) with larval fish, were compared for their utility to detect toxic Pfiesteria. The comparison included strains with confirmed toxicity, negative controls (noninducible Pfiesteria strains and a related nontoxic cryptoperidiniopsoid dinoflagellate), and P. shumwayae strain CCMP2089, which previously had been reported as nontoxic. SFBs, standardized by using toxic Pfiesteria (coupled with tests confirming Pfiesteria toxin) and conditions conducive to toxicity expression, reliably detected actively toxic Pfiesteria, but FMAs did not. Pfiesteria toxin was found in fish- and algae-fed clonal Pfiesteria cultures, including CCMP2089, but not in controls. In contrast, noninducible Pfiesteria and cryptoperidiniopsoids caused no juvenile fish mortality in SFBs even at high densities, and low larval fish mortality by physical attack in FMAs. Filtrate from toxic strains of Pfiesteria spp. in bacteria-free media was cytotoxic. Toxicity was enhanced by bacteria and other prey, especially live fish. Purified Pfiesteria toxin extract adversely affected mammalian cells as well as fish, and it caused fish death at environmentally relevant cell densities. These data show the importance of testing multiple strains when assessing the potential for toxicity at the genus or species level, using appropriate culturing techniques and assays.