RESUMO
U.S. Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program B-reading reports were analyzed for variability in identifying pneumoconiosis in 278,944 chest radiographs done from 1990 to 2004 using commercial database and statistical software. Reported presence of pneumoconiosis by 33 B-readers ranged from 1.85 to 32.28%. The reported presence of parenchymal abnormalities ranged from 0.11 to 15.07%; increased profusion (to 1/0 or greater) of small parenchymal opacities ranged from 0.10 to 17.70%; presence of large opacities ranged from 0.00 to 0.67%; and presence of pleural abnormalities ranged from 1.08 to 23.93%. Ranges appear to be decreasing slightly as rates of abnormal findings are diminishing. Differences between U.S. East Coast, West Coast, and midcontinent were not statistically significant.
Assuntos
Amianto/toxicidade , Militares , Medicina Naval , Saúde Ocupacional , Pneumoconiose/diagnóstico por imagem , Vigilância da População , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Humanos , Pneumoconiose/epidemiologia , Pneumoconiose/etiologia , Radiografia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of variability among B-readers on clinical occupational medicine. METHODS: A total of 419,770 B-reading reports from February 1980 to May 2004 in the US Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program were analyzed for changes in category from the previous B-reading on each individual worker. RESULTS: Over 7% of films were categorized as worse (ie, read as going from negative to positive), and over 6% were categorized as better. When profusion categories were reported as different from the previous reading (over 6% of the time), they were more frequently read as 2 or more minor categories worse or better. CONCLUSIONS: Changes from previous B-readings are common, and may have clinical and other implications, which are discussed. B-readings should not be used as the sole basis for determining the presence or absence of pneumoconiosis.
Assuntos
Asbestose/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Pulmonar de Massa/normas , Saúde Ocupacional , Vigilância da População/métodos , Amianto/efeitos adversos , Amianto/normas , Asbestose/epidemiologia , Asbestose/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Higiene Militar/normas , Medicina Naval , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados UnidosRESUMO
A 10-year cross-sectional analysis was conducted for 233,353 radiographic examinations performed as part of the Navy Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program. Demographic and temporal trends in abnormal radiographs were assessed during this analysis. Abnormal radiograph prevalence increased significantly with age, and abnormal radiographs were nearly 30 times more likely to occur among participants 60 to 69 years of age, compared with participants < 20 years of age (odds ratio, 27.57; 95% confidence interval, 14.75-51.53). Men were 5 times more likely than women to have an abnormal radiograph (odds ratio, 5.84; 95% confidence interval, 5.02-6.80); after controlling for differences in age, this gender association remained significant only for participants > 30 years of age. The proportion of abnormal radiographs decreased significantly over the study period [chi2 (df = 1) test for trend, chi2 = 198.7, p < 0.0001], although the cohort mean age increased. Despite aging of the Asbestos Medical Surveillance Program population, the overall prevalence of radiographic abnormalities is declining; future studies should examine the reasons for this observation.