RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Since its first description, alpha-fetoprotein has become the most widely used marker for diagnosing and monitoring patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to assess the correlation between serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and tumour dimensions in patients diagnosed with HCC, that were previously treated with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C viral infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 47 patients with a personal history of hepatitis C virus infection, who were diagnosed with different forms of HCC more than one year after achieving sustained virologic response after 12 weeks post-treatment. Patients were monitored by liver function tests, tumoral markers, blood cell count and coagulation profile and underwent imagistic explorations such as abdominal ultrasonography and, in selected cases, computerised tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Tumour burden was assessed by both tumour burden score and seven-eleven criteria. RESULTS: The study mostly included cirrhotic patients, multinodular HCC being the predominant pattern. All patients had alpha-fetoprotein levels over 100 ng/ml, with values largely varying, in accordance with the tumour dimensions. Most patients had medium-range Tumour Burden Score, a variable that also correlated with nodule size. CONCLUSIONS: The study found a significant correlation between serum alpha-fetoprotein and tumour size in patients with HCC. Alpha-fetoprotein also correlated well with Tumour Burden Score and remains a very important diagnostic and prognostic tool for patients with HCC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) opened a new era in the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated liver disease. However, hepatic cancer screening should not be stopped after obtaining a sustained virologic response (SVR). Current guidelines offer several treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mainly depending on its stage and the extent of liver disease, including tumor resection, liver transplantation (LT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic agents. This article provides an overview of treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma and associated survival rates based on the experience of the Internal Medicine Center at Fundeni Clinical Institute while bringing into light previous medical research. METHODS: We included 59 patients with a personal history of hepatitis C virus infection, diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma at least one year after achieving a sustained virologic response through direct-acting antivirals. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification were assessed in each case, and all patients were treated accordingly. The subjects were monitored by liver function tests, tumor markers, blood cell count, coagulation profile, and imaging explorations. We investigated the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, the response to applied treatments, and survival. RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients and multinodular tumor patterns were predominant. Most patients only experienced one therapeutic procedure, while the rest of the study group went through multiple treatment modalities (2-4), with a better outcome in terms of survival parameters. A large proportion presented with disease progression despite the therapeutic measures applied. A total of two liver transplants were performed, resulting in a 12-month disease-free period among these patients. The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), multinodular disease, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) over 300 ng/mL, and tumor dimension over 6 cm indicate poor overall survival. Both overall survival and progression-free survival were better in subjects who presented complete responses (CR) to HCC treatment. In patients undergoing a single intervention, the best overall survival was associated with surgical resection and RFA. CONCLUSION: The multimodal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma represents the best approach, in order to maintain patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. In hepatitis C virus infection, viral clearance is important to obtain. At the same time, particular attention should be paid to liver cancer screening even after obtaining a sustained virologic response.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: Liver injury has been frequently reported in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection, but data are still lacking regarding the impact of pre-existing liver damage and neoplasia on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcome and vice-versa. This study aimed to assess the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients, both in therapeutic-naïve and patients treated with direct acting antivirals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 21 patients with a personal history of HCV infection, that have been diagnosed with different forms of HCC and who were subsequently infected with SARS-CoV-2. Patients were monitored by liver function tests, tumoral markers, blood cell count, and coagulation profile periodically. RESULTS: Solitary HCC nodules were predominant among the subjects who achieved sustained virologic response, while multinodular and infiltrative patterns were mostly prevalent among the treatment-naïve group. Most patients had mild and moderate COVID-19 infections. CONCLUSION: Within the current global pandemic crisis, cancer patients are highly vulnerable and in need of constant monitoring. Among patients with HCC, the ones with cured HCV infection may be at a lower risk of fatality than those with active HCV infection, when diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection.