Effects of smoking on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib.

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetic variables of erlotinib in current smokers with nonsmokers after receiving a single oral 150 or 300 mg dose of erlotinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a single-center, open-label pharmacokinetic study in healthy male subjects. Subjects were enrolled into two treatment cohorts based on smoking status (current smokers and nonsmokers). The pharmacokinetic profile for erlotinib and its metabolite, OSI-420, was determined for each subject following each treatment. RESULTS: Current smokers achieved significantly less erlotinib exposure following a single 150 or 300 mg dose than nonsmokers. Following the 150 mg dose, the geometric mean erlotinib AUC(0-infinity) in smokers was 2.8-fold lower than in nonsmokers and similar to that of nonsmokers at the 300 mg dose. C(max) in smokers was two-thirds of that in nonsmokers, and C(24h) in smokers was 8.3-fold lower than in nonsmokers. The median C(24h) of smokers at the 300 mg dose was slightly less than the C(24h) of smokers at the 150 mg dose. The median C(max) was greater in smokers at the 300 mg dose than in nonsmokers at the 150 mg dose. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib is different in current smokers and nonsmokers. The observation that AUC(0-infinity) and C(24h) were significantly decreased in smokers compared with nonsmokers, and a smaller decrease in C(max) was observed, is consistent with increased metabolic clearance of erlotinib in current smokers.

A randomized, phase II, biomarker-selected study comparing erlotinib to erlotinib intercalated with chemotherapy in first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Erlotinib prolongs survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of a randomized, phase II study of erlotinib alone or intercalated with chemotherapy (CT + erlotinib) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC who were positive for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression and/or with high EGFR gene copy number. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 143 patients were randomly assigned to either erlotinib 150 mg daily orally until disease progression (PD) occurred or to chemotherapy with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) and carboplatin dosed by creatinine clearance (AUC 6) IV on day 1 intercalated with erlotinib 150 mg orally on days 2 through 15 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by erlotinib 150 mg orally until PD occurred (CT + erlotinib). The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included response rate, PFS, and survival. EGFR, KRAS mutation, EGFR fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, and E-cadherin and vimentin protein levels were also assessed. RESULTS: Six-month PFS rates were 26% and 31% for the two arms (CT + erlotinib and erlotinib alone, respectively). Both were less than the historical control of 45% (P = .001 and P = .011, respectively). Median PFS times were 4.57 and 2.69 months, respectively. Patients with tumors harboring EGFR activating mutations fared better on erlotinib alone (median PFS, 18.2 months v 4.9 months for CT + erlotinib). CONCLUSION: The feasibility of a multicenter biomarker-driven study was demonstrated, but neither treatment arms exceeded historical controls. This study does not support combined chemotherapy and erlotinib in first-line treatment of EGFR-selected advanced NSCLC, and the patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations had a better outcome on erlotinib alone.

Docetaxel and exisulind in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a multicenter, phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of docetaxel and exisulind in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function received exisulind (250 mg) given orally, twice daily, and docetaxel (36 mg/m) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle for up to six cycles. In the absence of disease progression or intolerable side effects, patients continued taking 250 mg of exisulind orally, twice daily. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (median age 60 years; range 34-77; median performance status 1) were enrolled. There were no objective responses documented. Sixteen patients [48%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-66%] had stable disease after 8 weeks of treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5-3.2 months); median overall survival time was 8.0 months (range 0.2-25.9 months). Toxicity was moderate, with dose adjustment for adverse event/toxicity required for docetaxel or exisulind in 13 (39.3%) patients. Grade 3/4 lymphopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurred in 48.5%, 12.1%, and 9.1% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicity was seen in 12.1%, 6.1%, and 3% of patients for nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and abdominal pain, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with exisulind and weekly docetaxel was not active in NSCLC patients who failed a prior platinum-containing regimen. Further study of this combination does not seem warranted.

Liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) plus dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma. A phase II International Oncology Study Group study.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal daunorubicin is an effective cytotoxic agent in patients with Kaposi sarcoma and hematologic malignancies. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens, such as vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (VAD), are standard in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Cardiotoxicity remains a limiting factor in dose escalation of anthracyclines, and multidrug resistance (MDR) develops rapidly on exposure to anthracyclines. Liposomal daunorubicin was designed in an attempt to overcome MDR and to reduce anthracycline-related toxicities. Thus, an open-label, Phase II clinical study was conducted by the International Oncology Study Group to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous liposomal daunorubicin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles in patients with recently diagnosed MM (n = 4 patients) or recurrent/refractory MM (n = 37 patients). METHODS: Liposomal daunorubicin was administered as a single agent for the initial two cycles of therapy, and dexamethasone was added to all subsequent cycles. The primary study end point was response rates. Thirty-eight patients were treated, 35 of whom were evaluable for response. RESULTS: A partial response was achieved in six patients (17%), including one patient with disease that previously was refractory to VAD therapy. Stable disease was observed in 22 patients (63%). The principal toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included granulocytopenia (26%), anemia (Grade 3 only; 11%), thrombocytopenia (11%), and febrile neutropenia (13%). The median survival in 35 patients with recurrent disease was 7.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal daunorubicin had activity in this population of poor-risk patients that was comparable to the activity of standard regimens. Further studies of this agent in combination with other anti-MM agents are warranted.

A phase II study of liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) in patients with topotecan resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, liposomal lurtotecan, in patients with topotecan resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS: The trial was an open-label phase II study for patients stratified by resistance to either single agent topotecan or to a prior topotecan-containing regimen. Liposomal lurtotecan was delivered at a dose of 2.4 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations and reductions were allowed based on hematologic toxicity. Patients were evaluated every two cycles for response to liposomal lurtotecan. RESULTS: Twenty-two women were accrued, with 16 women resistant to single agent topotecan and 6 women resistant to topotecan given in combination with a second chemotherapy agent. Hematologic toxicity consisted of mild to moderate thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia with mild to moderate gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. There were no responses, although eight patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal lurtotecan at this schedule demonstrates moderate hematologic toxicity and no evidence of clinical activity in a group of heavily pretreated women previously exposed to the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. The study of this agent in alternative patient populations or with alternative schedules is ongoing.