Survival in relation to time to start of curative treatment of colon cancer: A national register-based observational noninferiority study.

AIM: There are ample discussions regarding the timing of treatment, especially in the era after Covid that caused delay to treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether a delayed start to curative treatment, within 29-56 days after a diagnosis of colon cancer, was noninferior to starting treatment within 28 days, with regard to all-cause mortality. METHOD: This is a national register-based observational noninferiority study, with a noninferiority margin of hazard ratio (HR) 1.1, including all patients treated with curative intent for colon cancer in Sweden between 2008 and 2016. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, readmissions and reoperations within 1 year after surgery. Exclusion criteria were emergency surgery, disseminated disease at diagnosis, missing diagnosis date and treatment for another cancer 5 years before colon cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 20 836 individuals were included. A period of 29-56 days from diagnosis to start of curative treatment was noninferior versus starting treatment within 28 days for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.00). Starting treatment within 29-56 days was associated with a shorter length of stay (average 9.2 vs. 10 days) but a higher risk of reoperation compared to within 28 days. Post hoc analyses demonstrated that surgical modality was driving survival rather than time to treatment. Overall survival was greater after laparoscopic surgery (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.88). CONCLUSION: For patients with colon cancer, a period of up to 56 days from diagnosis to the start of curative treatment did not lead to worse overall survival.

A type I interferon footprint in pre-operative biopsies is an independent biomarker that in combination with CD8+ T cell quantification can improve the prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma.

Tailored treatment for patients with rectal cancer requires clinically available markers to predict their response to neoadjuvant treatment. The quantity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in pre-operative tumor biopsies has been suggested to predict a favorable response, but opposing results exist. A biopsy-adapted Immunoscore (ISB) based on TILs has recently emerged as a promising predictor of tumor regression and prognosis in (colo)rectal cancer. We aimed to refine the ISB for prediction of response using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) on pre-operative rectal cancer biopsies. We combined the distribution and density of conventional T cell subsets and γδT cells with a type I Interferon (IFN)-driven response assessed using Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) expression. We found that pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment was associated with type I IFN. Stratification of patients according to the density of CD8+ in the entire tumor tissue and MxA+ cells in tumor stroma, where equal weight was assigned to both parameters, resulted in improved predictive quality compared to the ISB. This novel stratification approach using these two independent parameters in pre-operative biopsies could potentially aid in identifying patients with a good chance of achieving a pCR following neoadjuvant treatment.

Younger age at onset of colorectal cancer is associated with increased patient's delay.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate if younger age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer was associated with a diagnostic delay. The secondary objective was to evaluate if symptomatology varied with age. METHOD: The study population consisted of the cohorts from two prospective multicentre studies conducted in Sweden and Denmark, the QoLiRECT and QoLiCOL studies. These studies investigated the quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Participants responded to the validated questionnaires used to extract information on patient's and doctor's delay as well as first presenting symptoms. Clinical variables were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database. RESULTS: 2574 patients were included, 1085 from QoLiRECT and 1489 from QoLiCOL. The probability of an increased patient's delay was higher when age decreased by 10 years (the SD in both QoLiRECT and QoLiCOL), adjusted OR 1.19 (95%CI: 1.10; 1.30), p < 0.001. A similar effect was found for doctor's delay, but the age effect was smaller in this case, adjusted OR 1.05 (95%CI: 0.97; 1.15), p = 0.177. When the age effect was analysed non-linearly, an increased probability of a delay was seen for patients from around 60 years and below. Younger patients were equally or more likely to report the symptoms of blood in stool, diarrhoea, constipation, mucus in faeces, faecal urgency, faecal emptying difficulties and pain compared to older patients. CONCLUSION: Younger patients were more likely to have an increased patient's delay, probably contributing to a delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Symptomatology at diagnosis was similar irrespective of age.

Health-Related Quality-of-Life in a cohort undergoing cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-related outcome measures are crucial when assessing outcome from surgical intervention registers. The aim of this study was to analyse what factors affect Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing cholecystectomy, and to assess the feasibility of SF-36 as a HRQoL instrument in a patient register. METHODS: The SF-36 questionnaire was distributed to patients preoperatively and 6-9 months after surgery. The outcome of patients who had undergone planned surgery between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011 at six units, with response rates of at least 100 per year, formed the basis for the present study. Expected outcome from a background population was determined from a Swedish cohort assembled previously. RESULTS: Altogether 919 patients (646 women, 273 men) at the six units answered the questionnaire. Mean age was 52 years, standard deviation 15 years. Preoperatively, the surgery cohort rated lower on all subscales of the SF-36 than the age- and gender-matched background population. Postoperatively, they did not rate lower in any of the subscales. High age was associated with a significantly lower increase in bodily pain and Physical Component Summary (both p < 0.05). Open surgery was associated with a significantly lower increase in the Physical Component Summary (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Regardless of indication for surgery, high age is associated with less benefit from surgery according to this questionnaire study. SF-36 is appropriate for measuring the impact of gallstone surgery on HRQoL.