Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Res ; 283: 719-725, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36462382

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressing infection of the soft tissues associated with high morbidity and mortality and hence it is a surgical emergency. Early diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance. LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) and SIARI (Site other than lower limb, Immunosuppression, Age, Renal impairment, and Inflammatory markers) scoring systems have been established for early and accurate diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. This study compared the two scoring systems for diagnosing NF, predicting management, and elucidating the prognostic performance for re-operation and mortality. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in PGIMER Chandigarh, India, between February 2020 and June 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (No. INT/IEC/2020-90). The clinical presentation, laboratory parameters, and imaging were used to classify patients into NF or severe cellulitis groups. We also calculated the LRINEC and SIARI scores. Demographic variables and mortality were recorded. The area under the receiver operating characteristic was used to express the accuracy of both scores at a cut-off LRINEC and SIARI scores of ≥6 and ≥ 4, respectively. RESULTS: The study comprised 41 patients with NF and 11 with severe cellulitis. Informed written consent was taken from all the participants. At LRINEC score ≥6, the C-statistic for NF diagnosis was 0.839 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.682-0.995, P 0.001), which was better than SIARI score at ≥ 4, C-statistic of 0.608 (95% CI 0.43-0.787, P 0.297). Both scores accurately predicted 30-day mortality. The LRINEC score showed a C-statistic of 0.912 (95% CI 0.798-1, P 0.001). Simultaneously, the SIARI score showed 70% sensitivity and 77% specificity, with a C-statistic of 0.805 (0.62-0.99, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: LRINEC score is an effective diagnostic tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from severe cellulitis. Additional research is required to establish the SIARI score's external validity.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante , Insuficiência Renal , Humanos , Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Celulite (Flegmão) , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Extremidade Inferior
2.
Clin Transplant Res ; 38(1): 63-69, 2024 Mar 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374662

RESUMO

Post-liver transplant (LT) hepatic artery vasospasm is a vascular complication that is not well recognized and its incidence is not known. As a possible sequela to vasospasm, hepatic artery thrombosis is the second major cause of allograft failure after primary nonfunction and its reported incidence is 2.9% in adults and 8.3% in pediatric LT. Lacuna in knowledge regarding early hepatic artery vasospasm post-LT makes it a difficult condition to diagnose and treat, as the initial ischemic insult on graft can have devastating consequences. We report a case of pediatric progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3-related chronic liver disease who underwent cadaveric orthotopic LT and postoperatively developed fever, worsening hypotension, and elevated liver enzymes with an absence of arterial flow in intrahepatic branches on Doppler ultrasound. Suspecting early hepatic artery thrombosis, the patient was re-explored and the graft hepatic artery was found to be in a state of vasospasm. Following the infusion of intra-arterial papaverine, urokinase, and intravenous nicorandil, there was an improvement in blood flow. The patient responded well and was discharged on postoperative day 23 with normal liver enzymes.

3.
Cureus ; 16(2): e53851, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465042

RESUMO

Advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) presenting with surgical emergencies are rare. Neoadjuvant imatinib being the treatment of choice for non-metastatic advanced disease with a proven role in downstaging the disease may not be feasible in patients presenting with bleeding and obstruction. We present a case series with retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with advanced and metastatic GISTs presenting with surgical emergencies. Clinical characteristics, imaging and endoscopic findings, surgical procedures, histological findings, and outcomes in these patients were studied. Four patients were included in this case series, with three males and one female (age range: 24-60 years). Two patients presented with melena; one with hemodynamic instability despite multiple blood transfusions underwent urgent exploratory laparotomy for bleeding gastric GIST, while the other underwent surgical exploration after careful evaluation given the recurrent, metastatic disease with a stable metabolic response on six months of imatinib. One patient with metastatic jejunal GIST who presented with an umbilical nodule and intestinal obstruction was given a trial of non-operative management for 72 hours, but due to non-resolution of obstruction, segmental jejunal en bloc resection with the dome of the urinary bladder with reconstruction and metastasectomy was needed. The patient with advanced gastric GIST who presented with gastric outlet obstruction was resuscitated, and an attempt of endoscopic naso-jejunal tube placement was tried, which failed, and exploration was needed. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.5 days. Histopathological examination confirmed GIST in all four patients with microscopic negative resection margins. All patients were started on imatinib with dose escalation to 800 mg in the patient with recurrent and metastatic disease; however, the patient with bleeding gastric GIST experienced severe adverse effects of imatinib and discontinued the drug shortly. All four patients are disease-free on follow-ups of 15 months, 48 months for the patient with advanced non-metastatic disease, and six and 24 months for the patients with metastatic disease. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for advanced and metastatic disease, upfront surgery is usually reserved for surgical emergencies only. Surgical resection, the cornerstone for the treatment of resectable GIST, may also be clinically relevant in metastatic settings, although it requires a careful and individualized approach.

4.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45349, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37849602

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program established improved clinical outcomes in elective surgery; however, its role in emergencies is uncertain. This study was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a tailored-ERAS (t-ERAS) protocol in patients undergoing modified Graham's patch closure for gastro-duodenal perforation. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective, parallel-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021. Patients with gastroduodenal perforation undergoing modified Graham's patch were randomly assigned to either conventional care or the t-ERAS pathway. Patients with refractory septic shock, psychiatric or neurological disorders, pregnancy, multiple perforations, sealed-off perforations, and perforation sizes greater than 1.5 cm were excluded. The primary outcome was to compare the length of hospitalization (LOH). Functional recovery parameters and morbidity were compared in secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients each were included in conventional care and the t-ERAS group. In the t-ERAS group, LOH was significantly shorter (6.3 SD2.15 days versus 9.56 SD4.33 days, p = 0.001). Patients in the t-ERAS group had significantly early functional recovery (days) with time to first bowel sound (1.8 SD0.41; p 0.002), first flatus (2.52 SD0.65; p = 0.026), first stool (3.04 SD0.68; p < 0.001), first liquid diet (2.24 SD0.60; p = 0.002), and duration of ileus (2.64 SD0.86; p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in morbidity such as post-operative nausea and vomiting, SSI, or pulmonary complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Tailored ERAS pathways are safe and effective in reducing the LOH and promoting early functional recovery in patients undergoing emergency closure of gastro-duodenal perforation.

5.
Cureus ; 14(1): e21402, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35198309

RESUMO

Anatomic variation of the hepatic artery is common and often seen in patients with periampullary carcinoma undergoing a pancreatic duodenectomy. Replaced right hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery is the most common variant encountered. Here we present a rare case of an unclassified pattern of the variant anatomy of replaced right hepatic artery originating from the celiac trunk along with an accessory left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery in a patient with periampullary carcinoma undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

6.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 28(10): 1397-1403, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169463

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection continues to be a major problem after laparotomy for perforation peritonitis, as it increases morbidity and hospital stay and decreases the quality of life. Intra-abdominal drain placement is a routine practice in perforation peri-tonitis. The aim of our study is to compare the incidence of surgical site infection in two groups of patients who were operated for perforation peritonitis: The first group received the intraperitoneal drain, while no drain was placed in the second group. METHODS: The present single-center, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, India. A total of 122 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy for gastroduodenal and small bowel perforation peritonitis, of which 100 participants were included in this study, based on specified cri-teria for inclusion and exclusion. A total of 50 participants each were included in the drain group and the no drain group, respectively. A drain was placed in every alternate patient with perforation peritonitis who received primary closure or resection anastomosis. Patients with diabetes, renal failure, and hemodynamic instability and those who presented more than 72 h since symptom onset were excluded from the study. Peritoneal fluids were cultured. The primary endpoint was to identify the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in the two groups. We also compared the time taken for the return of bowel movements, duration for which a nasogastric tube was inserted, whether any intervention was performed under local or general anesthesia within 30 days of surgery, the duration of hospital stay, and the ease of diagnosing repair leak in the post-operative period in both the groups. RESULTS: Demographics of participants in both the groups were matched. No significant difference was observed between the drain and no-drain groups with respect to the incidence of surgical site infection (p=0.779). The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the no drain group. A significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning the peritoneal culture growth, and increased bacterial growth was seen in the drain group. No significant difference in morbidity was noted between the two groups, which was classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. CONCLUSION: Routine use of intra-abdominal drains was not found to be effective in preventing SSIs, but a selection bias cannot be ruled out. Patients with no drains had a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay.


Assuntos
Peritonite , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
7.
Cureus ; 13(8): e17372, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34584782

RESUMO

Introduction Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are uncommon in young adults ≤55 years of age. There is a lack of literature on clinical characteristics, risk factors, and therapeutic outcomes so we present a case series of 11 patients of AAA aged ≤55 years. Methods We included single-center retrospective case series between 2013 to 2020. We reviewed 44 patients who were operated for AAA in a tertiary care center in India. We identified 13 patients who were ≤55 years; two patients with incomplete records were excluded. A patient information sheet was used to retrieve demographic data, clinical presentation, outcomes, and follow-up. Results Out of 11 patients, 10 were men. Nine patients (81.8%) had symptomatic AAA. The majority (45.4%) exhibited an infrarenal aneurysm and the median size of the aneurysm was 5.8 cm (IQR: 5.5-6.4 cm). Eight patients (72.7%) had a history of smoking. Hypertension was observed in six patients and one patient had associated coronary artery disease. Clamping time was > 45 minutes among three patients; all smokers. Blood loss was > 500 ml in five patients. The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (7-40); more among patients with metabolic equivalents (METS) score < 4, 14.5 (8-19) days. No grade III-IV complications and mortality were noted with a median follow-up of 15 months, with all patients living. Conclusion The aneurysm was symptomatic in the majority of participants. An association of smoking in increasing both the median clamping time and length of hospital stay was seen. No mortality and good disease-free follow-up suggested good outcomes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa