Comparison between the Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta device against the Cartridge-based Thromboelastography 6s and Quantra in a healthy third trimester pregnant cohort.

Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) Delta has been described in several postpartum hemorrhage algorithms, but this device requires pipetting and careful mixing of reagents to initiate the clotting reaction. In contrast, thromboelastography (TEG 6s) and the Quantra devices operate utilizing an automated pre-mixed cartridge that only requires a blood sample to start the clot strength analysis. We compared the correlation between 3 point of care viscoelastic testing (POCVT) devices to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen and platelets, their inter-device correlation, and the total running time difference between Quantra and ROTEM. A high correlation was noted between the Clauss fibrinogen and the fibrinogen parameters from ROTEM (r = 0.76-0.84, P < 0.0001), TEG6s (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and Quantra (r = 0.72, P = 0.0001). A moderate correlation between laboratory platelets and the ROTEM (r = 0.54;0.45, P < 0.0001; P = 0.0013) and Quantra (r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) parameters was noted. The inter-device correlation showed to be high when comparing the fibrinogen parameters of TEG6s and Quantra to that of ROTEM (r = 0.88 and 0.74, P < 0.0001, respectively). In contrast, a moderate correlation was noted between the platelet parameters of Quantra and ROTEM (r = 0.51, p = 0.0036). The Quantra device resulted 20.9 min (95% CI -0.2 to 4.7, P = 0.07) faster than the ROTEM if the warming and pipetting of reagents of the latter were considered. All the POCVT devices demonstrated a high correlation to laboratory Clauss fibrinogen, making each beneficial for the early recognition and management of hypofibrinogenemia.

Baseline rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) values in a healthy, diverse obstetric population and parameter changes by pregnancy-induced comorbidities.

Background: Point-of-care testing provides a representation of the patient's coagulability status during effective postpartum hemorrhage management. Baseline values of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have not yet been reported in a heterogeneous obstetric population. This study aimed to establish a baseline for a diverse population representative of the United States. The secondary aim was to evaluate the association of these hematologic parameters with comorbidities, race, and socioeconomic factors. Methods: The study was a retrospective review of collected ROTEM values of women undergoing vaginal or cesarean delivery with a history of or at risk for postpartum hemorrhage. Patients were divided into healthy and comorbid groups. Exclusion criteria for both groups included active or recent bleeding, receipt of blood products or clot-enhancing factors, and liver disease. Mean values of ROTEM by race and comorbidities were included. Median values were reported for intrinsic pathway thromboelastometry (INTEM), extrinsic pathway thromboelastometry (EXTEM), and fibrin polymerization thromboelastometry (FIBTEM) amplitude at 10 minutes (A10) and 20 minutes (A20), coagulation time, clot formation time, and maximum clot firmness. Results: A total of 681 records were reviewed; 485 met inclusion criteria, and 267 met healthy criteria. The mean (standard deviation) demographics for maternal age (years), body mass index (kg/m2), and gestational age (weeks) were 32.2 (5.7), 34 (7.3), and 35.4 (5), respectively. The median INTEM, EXTEM, and FIBTEM A10 were 63, 65, and 23 mm. The mean for INTEM, EXTEM, and FIBTEM A10 was increased for those who were Black or obese, whereas a decreased FIBTEM and EXTEM A10 was noted in those who were Asian or those who had the hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet syndrome. Conclusions: Our heterogeneous population presents ROTEM values within the interquartile range of those previously reported in European studies. Black race, obesity, and preeclampsia were associated with hypercoagulable profiles.

Ultrasound Image Quality Comparison Between a Handheld Ultrasound Transducer and Mid-Range Ultrasound Machine.

Objectives: Not all labor and delivery floors are equipped with ultrasound machines which can serve the needs of both obstetricians and anesthesiologists. This cross-sectional, blinded, randomized observational study compares the image resolution (RES), detail (DET), and quality (IQ) acquired by a handheld ultrasound, the Butterfly iQ, and a mid-range mobile device, the Sonosite M-turbo US (SU), to evaluate their use as a shared resource. Methods: Seventy-four pairs of ultrasound images were obtained for different imaging purposes: 29 for spine (Sp), 15 for transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and 30 for diagnostic obstetrics (OB) purposes. Each location was scanned by both the handheld and mid-range machine, resulting in 148 images. The images were graded by three blinded experienced sonographers on a 10-point Likert scale. Results: The mean difference for Sp imaging favored the handheld device (RES: -0.6 [(95% CI -1.1, -0.1), p = 0.017], DET: -0.8 [(95% CI -1.2, -0.3), p = 0.001] and IQ: -0.9 [95% CI-1.3, -0.4, p = 0.001]). For the TAP images, there was no statistical difference in RES or IQ, but DET was favored in the handheld device (-0.8 [(95% CI-1.2, -0.5), p < 0.001]). For OB images, the SU was favored over the handheld device with RES, DET and IQ with mean differences of 1.7 [(95% CI 1.2, 2.1), p < 0.001], 1.6 [(95% CI 1.2, 2.0], p < 0.001] and 1.1 [(95% CI 0.7, 1.5]), p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Where resources are limited, a handheld ultrasound may be considered as a potential low-cost alternative to a more expensive ultrasound machine for point of care ultrasonography, better suited to anesthetic vs. diagnostic obstetrical indications.