Fat Grafting to Improve Results of Facelift: Systematic Review of Safety and Effectiveness of Current Treatment Paradigms.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting is a helpful supplement to facelift surgery that helps to combat age-related volume loss of facial structures. Despite the widespread prevalence of combined facelift and fat-grafting, significant procedural variation exists between providers. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this systematic review was to study the efficacy and complication rates of facelift with lipofilling compared with facelift alone. METHODS: A systematic review of the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases as completed was undertaken to identify all clinical reports of fat grafting combined with facelift surgery based on the following key terms: ("fat grafting" OR "lipotransfer" OR "lipofilling" OR "fat transfer") AND ("facelift" OR "rhytidectomy" OR "SMASectomy" OR "facial rejuvenation"). Data on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected. RESULTS: The systematic review was performed in April 2017. In total, 248 articles were identified for review. After application of exclusion criteria, 15 primary studies were included in this review. Various facelift techniques were reported, including deep-plane or sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) facelift, SMAS facelift, modified minimal access cranial suspension lift, component facelift, midface lift, SMAS plication, SMAS-stacking/SMASectomy, and SMASectomy. The most common locations of fat graft injection included the nasolabial folds, tear troughs, temporal regions, midface/cheek/malar eminence, marionette groove, lips, and ear lobes. The addition of fat grafting to facelift surgery resulted in significant improvements in facial volume and aesthetic assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Combined facelift and fat grafting is a safe and efficacious means to simultaneously address age-related ptosis and volume loss. Further research is required to validate and improve existing treatment modalities.

Hypertonic saline resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock does not decrease in vivo neutrophil interactions with endothelium in the blood-brain microcirculation.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock with isotonic crystalloids has been shown to activate polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). Although hypertonic saline (HTS) can reduce PMN activation and interactions with endothelial cells (EC) in systemic microvascular beds, no data exist demonstrating that the same occurs in the unique blood-brain barrier microcirculation. We hypothesized that resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock with HTS would blunt brain in vivo PMN-EC interactions. METHODS: Wistar rats (250-350 g) underwent craniotomy and placement of a window for live intravital viewing of pial vessels. Twenty animals were bled to a mean arterial pressure of 30 mm Hg to 35 mm Hg for 1 hour and resuscitated with shed blood and either 5% HTS (6 mL/kg) or Ringer's lactate (RL) (2× shed blood volume). Circulating rhodamine-6G-labeled PMN in pial venules were captured by videomicroscopy at baseline (preshock), end of the shock period, after resuscitation, and every 15 minutes to 30 minutes for 2 hours. Hemodynamics and arterial gases were monitored. Off-line footage analysis allowed comparisons of PMN-EC interactions between groups. RESULTS: Animals in both groups developed significant metabolic acidosis (p < 0.01) after hemorrhage, but postresuscitation blood pressures were similar at all time points. Crystalloid resuscitation volumes were 10× greater in RL than HTS animals (p < 0.001). For all time points, we did not observe the expected reduction in PMN rolling and adhesion in HTS animals, instead noted trends of consistently lower interactions in RL counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In contradistinction to studies evaluating the systemic microcirculation, HTS may activate PMN-EC crosstalk in the blood-brain microcirculation. Further studies are needed to analyze whether this effect is due to the unique nature of the blood-brain interface.

Similar effects of hypertonic saline and mannitol on the inflammation of the blood-brain barrier microcirculation after brain injury in a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: There has been substantial debate regarding the efficacy of hypertonic saline (HTS) versus mannitol (MTL) in treating moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). HTS blunts polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) and endothelial cell (EC) activation and reduces tissue edema after resuscitated shock in systemic microvascular beds. MTL also modulates PMN activation markers. It remains unknown if either of these osmotherapies exert similar anti-inflammatory effects along the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We hypothesized that HTS, as compared with MTL, would more greatly reduce PMN-EC interactions, thereby reducing BBB permeability and tissue edema after simulated TBI. METHODS: CD1 male mice (25-30 g) underwent craniotomy and window placement for observation of in vivo PMN-EC interactions in pial venules using intravital video microscopy. TBI was simulated through local suffusion of the brain surface with interleukin 1ß (100 ng/0.1 mL). Animals were randomized to receive a single, equiosmolar, intravenous dose of 20% MTL or 5% HTS after injury. Live microcirculatory footage was obtained every 15 minutes for 2 hours, after which fluorescent-labeled albumin was administered to assess microvascular permeability. PMN rolling and adhesion and macromolecular leakage were analyzed offline by a blinded observer and postmortem brain and lung edema assessed by wet-to-dry ratios. Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test determined significance (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Neither osmotherapy resulted in significant differences in PMN rolling or adhesion; however, both trended higher in HTS. Similarly, vessel permeability did not differ between groups but also trended higher with HTS. In contrast, brain and lung edema was greater in MTL than HTS as compared with controls (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: MTL and HTS have indistinguishable effects on PMN-EC interactions in the brain after simulated TBI. Additional studies are needed to determine if either osmotherapy has more subtle effects on BBB PMN-EC interactions after injury exerting a potential clinical advantage.