Response duration and survival shorten after each relapse in patients with follicular lymphoma treated in the rituximab era.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent disease characterized by long survival but frequent relapses. Before the introduction of rituximab, the clinical course of these patients showed a shorter response duration (RD) after each relapse. In this study, we analysed if this pattern of shortened responses remains in patients treated in the rituximab era. We selected 348 patients newly diagnosed with FL in two institutions between 2001 and 2014 that received chemoimmunotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6·3 years, 10-year progression-free and overall survivals were 53% and 72%, respectively. All patients received first-line, 111 second-line and 41 third-line treatments, with a 5-year RD of 62%, 39% and 24%, respectively (P < 0·0001). Variables predicting longer RD after first-line treatment were normal ß2microglobulin, complete remission achievement and maintenance with rituximab. Patients with longer RD after first-line showed significantly longer RD after second-line therapy. Autologous stem-cell transplantation after second-line therapy did not significantly impact RD. Median survival after first, second and third therapies was not reached, 7·6 and 4·8 years, respectively, whereas relative survival with respect to a sex- and age-matched Spanish population, the decrease in the life expectancy at 10 years was 17%, 45% and 79%, respectively. Thus, RD still shortens after each relapse in patients with FL treated in first line with rituximab combinations.

Testicular large B-cell lymphoma is genetically similar to PCNSL and distinct from nodal DLBCL.

Testicular large B-cell lymphoma (TLBCL) is an infrequent and aggressive lymphoma arising in an immune-privileged site and has recently been recognized as a distinct entity from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We describe the genetic features of TLBCL and compare them with published series of nodal DLBCL and primary large B-cell lymphomas of the CNS (PCNSL). We collected 61 patients with TLBCL. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing, copy number arrays, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to assess chromosomal rearrangements in 40 cases with available material. Seventy percent of the cases showed localized stages. BCL6 rearrangements were detected in 36% of cases, and no concomitant BCL2 and MYC rearrangements were found. TLBCL had fewer copy number alterations (p < 0.04) but more somatic variants (p < 0.02) than nodal DLBCL and had more frequent 18q21.32-q23 (BCL2) gains and 6q and 9p21.3 (CDKN2A/B) deletions. PIM1, MYD88 L265P , CD79B, TBL1XR1, MEF2B, CIITA, EP300, and ETV6 mutations were more frequent in TLBCL, and BCL10 mutations in nodal DLBCL. There were no major genetic differences between TLBCL and PCNSL. Localized or disseminated TLBCL displayed similar genomic profiles. Using LymphGen, the majority of cases were classified as MCD. However, we observed a subgroup of patients classified as BN2, both in localized and disseminated TLBCL, suggesting a degree of genetic heterogeneity in the TLBCL genetic profile. TLBCL has a distinctive genetic profile similar to PCNSL, supporting its recognition as a separate entity from DLBCL and might provide information to devise targeted therapeutic approaches.

Comparative analysis of CAR T-cell therapy access for DLBCL patients: associated challenges and solutions in the four largest EU countries.

Introduction: CAR T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising new immuno-oncology treatment that engages the patient's immune system to fight certain hematological malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In the European Union (EU), CAR T-cell therapies have been approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients since 2018, but patient access is often still limited or delayed. This paper is aimed at discussing challenges to access and possible solutions in the largest four EU countries. Methods: The analysis relied on literature review, market data collection, since homogeneous data coming from registries were not available, and discussion with experts coming from all four countries. Results: We calculated that in 2020, between 58% and 83% of R/R DLBCL patients (EMA approved label population) or between 29% and 71% of the estimated medically eligible R/R DLBCL patients, were not treated with a licensed CAR T-cell therapy. Common challenges along the patient journey that may result in limited access or delays to CAR T-cell therapy were identified. These include timely identification and referral of eligible patients, pre-treatment funding approval by authorities and payers, and resource needs at CAR T-cell centers. Discussion: These challenges, existing best practices and recommended focus areas for health systems are discussed here, with the aim to inform necessary actions for overcoming patient access challenges for current CAR T-cell therapies as well as for future cell and gene therapies.