Bowel Dysfunction After Colon Cancer Surgery: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies on functional outcome after colon resection are limited. OBJECTIVE: Examine bowel dysfunction and related distress one and three years after colon resection utilizing the low anterior resection syndrome score as well as specific validated items. DESIGN: This study presents the long-term results of bowel dysfunction and related distress based on the quality of life in colon cancer study, an observational, prospective multicenter study of patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at 21 Swedish and Danish surgical centers between 2015 and 2019. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent right- or left-sided colon resection were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria were age below 18, cognitive impairment or inability to understand Swedish/Danish. Patients completed extensive questionnaires at diagnosis, and after one and three years. Clinical data were supplemented by national quality registries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The low anterior resection syndrome score, specific bowel symptoms and the patient-reported distress were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,221 patients (83% response rate), 17% reported major LARS one year after either type of resection, consistent at 3 years (17% right, 16% left). In the long-term, the only significant difference between types of resection was a high occurrence of loose stools following right-sided resections. Overall, less than one-fifth of patients experienced distress, with women reporting more frequent symptoms and greater distress. In particular, incontinence and loose stools correlated strongly with distress. LIMITATIONS: Absence of pre-diagnosis bowel function data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that bowel function remains largely intact following colon resection, with only a minority reporting significant distress. Adverse outcomes were more common among women. The occurrence of loose stools following right-sided resection and the association between incontinence, loose stools, and distress highlights a need for postoperative evaluations and more thorough assessments beyond the LARS score when evaluating colon cancer patients. See Video Abstract.

The impact of the anastomotic configuration on low anterior resection syndrome 3 years after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a national cohort study.

AIM: After low anterior resection, the bowel can be anastomosed in different ways. It is not clear which configuration is optimal from a functional and complication point of view. The primary aim was to investigate the impact of the anastomotic configuration on bowel function evaluated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Secondarily, the impact on postoperative complications was evaluated. METHOD: All patients who had undergone low anterior resection from 2015 to 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Three years after surgery, patients were sent an extensive questionnaire and were analysed based on anastomotic configuration ('J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis' or 'straight anastomosis'). Inverse probability weighting by propensity score was used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Among 892 patients, 574 (64%) responded, of whom 494 patients were analysed. After weighting, the anastomotic configuration had no significant impact on the LARS score (J-pouch/side-to-end OR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.34). The J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis was significantly associated with overall postoperative complications (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06-1.95). No significant difference was seen regarding surgical complications (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.78-1.66). CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the impact of the anastomotic configuration on long-term bowel function, evaluated by the LARS score, in an unselected national cohort. Our results suggested no benefit for J-pouch/side-to-end anastomosis on long-term bowel function and postoperative complication rates. The anastomotic strategy may be based upon the anatomical conditions of the patient and surgical preference.

Predicting life with a permanent end colostomy: A prospective study on function, bother and acceptance.

AIM: The factors that influence a patient's experience of a colostomy are not known. The aim of this study was to characterise stoma function, stoma-related bother and acceptance among patients operated for rectal cancer and to investigate if there were any preoperative personal factors with predictive impact on long-term stoma-related bother. METHODS: The QoLiRECT (Quality of Life in RECTal cancer) study is a prospective multicentre study of patients with rectal cancer. This was a subgroup analysis of patients with a permanent colostomy with a 2-year follow-up. Penalised regression models with shrinkage estimation were used to predict the 1-and 2-year bother using baseline data. The predictive value and the importance of the included variables were evaluated using bootstrap resampling techniques. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were included. Overall stoma acceptance was high and a majority of patients were not bothered by their stoma; 77% and 83% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The subgroup of patients with stoma-related bother had a high prevalence of difficulties, especially fear of leakage, and a low stoma acceptance in daily life. Both clinical and personal factors were associated with stoma-related bother. The most important factors were quality of life and physical health, but the prediction accuracy was low. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma-related bother was associated with overall stoma dysfunction. As stoma-related bother is a multifactorial problem, it was not possible to predict which patients will experience stoma-related bother. It is therefore of importance to prevent stoma-related symptoms and optimise stoma function to reduce long-term bother and increase stoma acceptance.