Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 8, 2023 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency. Guidelines recommend a stepwise strategy of benzodiazepines followed by a second-line anti-seizure medicine (ASM). However, GCSE is uncontrolled in 20-40% patients and is associated with protracted hospitalisation, disability, and mortality. The objective was to determine whether valproic acid (VPA) as complementary treatment to the stepwise strategy improves the outcomes of patients with de novo established GCSE. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 244 adults admitted to intensive care units for GCSE in 16 French hospitals between 2013 and 2018. Patients received standard care of benzodiazepine and a second-line ASM (except VPA). Intervention patients received a 30 mg/kg VPA loading dose, then a 1 mg/kg/h 12 h infusion, whilst the placebo group received an identical intravenous administration of 0.9% saline as a bolus and continuous infusion. Primary outcome was proportion of patients discharged from hospital by day 15. The secondary outcomes were seizure control, adverse events, and cognition at day 90. RESULTS: A total of 126 (52%) and 118 (48%) patients were included in the VPA and placebo groups. 224 (93%) and 227 (93%) received a first-line and a second-line ASM before VPA or placebo infusion. There was no between-group difference for patients hospital-discharged at day 15 [VPA, 77 (61%) versus placebo, 72 (61%), adjusted relative risk 1.04; 95% confidence interval (0.89-1.19); p = 0.58]. There were no between-group differences for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: VPA added to the recommended strategy for adult GCSE is well tolerated but did not increase the proportion of patients hospital-discharged by day 15. TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT01791868 (ClinicalTrials.gov registry), registered: 15 February 2012.


Assuntos
Benzodiazepinas , Ácido Valproico , Adulto , Humanos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Alta do Paciente , Administração Intravenosa
2.
JAMA ; 322(3): 229-239, 2019 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310299

RESUMO

Importance: Keeping a diary for patients while they are in the intensive care unit (ICU) might reduce their posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Objectives: To assess the effect of an ICU diary on the psychological consequences of an ICU hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: Assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in 35 French ICUs from October 2015 to January 2017, with follow-up until July 2017. Among 2631 approached patients, 709 adult patients (with 1 family member each) who received mechanical ventilation within 48 hours after ICU admission for at least 2 days were eligible, 657 were randomized, and 339 were assessed 3 months after ICU discharge. Interventions: Patients in the intervention group (n = 355) had an ICU diary filled in by clinicians and family members. Patients in the control group (n = 354) had usual ICU care without an ICU diary. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was significant PTSD symptoms, defined as an Impact Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) score greater than 22 (range, 0-88; a higher score indicates more severe symptoms), measured in patients 3 months after ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes, also measured at 3 months and compared between groups, included significant PTSD symptoms in family members; significant anxiety and depression symptoms in patients and family members, based on a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score greater than 8 for each subscale (range, 0-42; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms; minimal clinically important difference, 2.5); and patient memories of the ICU stay, reported with the ICU memory tool. Results: Among 657 patients who were randomized (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [51-70] years; 126 women [37.2%]), 339 (51.6%) completed the trial. At 3 months, significant PTSD symptoms were reported by 49 of 164 patients (29.9%) in the intervention group vs 60 of 175 (34.3%) in the control group (risk difference, -4% [95% CI, -15% to 6%]; P = .39). The median (interquartile range) IES-R score was 12 (5-25) in the intervention group vs 13 (6-27) in the control group (difference, -1.47 [95% CI, -1.93 to 4.87]; P = .38). There were no significant differences in any of the 6 prespecified comparative secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who received mechanical ventilation in the ICU, the use of an ICU diary filled in by clinicians and family members did not significantly reduce the number of patients who reported significant PTSD symptoms at 3 months. These findings do not support the use of ICU diaries for preventing PTSD symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02519725.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/psicologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Respiração Artificial/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Família/psicologia , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Registros
3.
Trials ; 18(1): 542, 2017 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29141694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-intensive care syndrome includes the multiple consequences of an intensive care unit (ICU) stay for patients and families. It has become a new challenge for intensivists. Prevention programs have been disappointing, except for ICU diaries, which report the patient's story in the ICU. However, the effectiveness of ICU diaries for patients and families is still controversial, as the interpretation of the results of previous studies was open to criticism hampering an expanded use of the diary. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the post-traumatic stress syndrome in patients. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the post-traumatic stress syndrome in families, anxiety and depression symptoms in patients and families, and the recollected memories of patients. Endpoints will be evaluated 3 months after ICU discharge or death. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, assessor-blind comparative study of the effect of an ICU diary on patients and families. We will compare two groups: one group with an ICU diary written by staff and family and given to the patient at ICU discharge or to the family in case of death, and a control group without any ICU diary. Each of the 35 participating centers will include 20 patients having at least one family member who will likely visit the patient during their ICU stay. Patients must be ventilated within 48 h after ICU admission and not have any previous chronic neurologic or acute condition responsible for cognitive impairments that would hamper their participation in a phone interview. Three months after ICU discharge or death of the patient, a psychologist will contact the patient and family by phone. Post-traumatic stress syndrome will be evaluated using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised questionnaire, anxiety and depression symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire, both in patients and families, and memory recollection using the ICU Memory Tool Questionnaire in patients. The content of a randomized sample of diaries of each center will be analyzed using a grid. An interview of the patients in the intervention arm will be conducted 6 months after ICU discharge to analyze in depth how they use the diary. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new insights on the impact of ICU diaries on post-traumatic stress disorders in patients and families after an ICU stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, ID: NCT02519725 . Registered on 13 July 2015.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/psicologia , Cuidados Críticos , Depressão/psicologia , Relações Familiares , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Prontuários Médicos , Pacientes/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Depressão/diagnóstico , França , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Memória , Saúde Mental , Narração , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síndrome , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Crit Care Med ; 35(4): 1032-9, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17334256

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new silver-impregnated multi-lumen central venous catheter for reducing catheter-related colonization in intensive care patients. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. SETTING: Ten adult intensive care units (multidisciplinary, medical and surgical, university and nonuniversity hospitals) in eight institutions. PATIENTS: A total of 577 patients who required 617 multi-lumen central venous catheters between November 2002 and April 2004 were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive care adult patients requiring multi-lumen central venous catheters expected to remain in place for >or=3 days were randomly assigned to undergo insertion of silver-impregnated catheters (silver group) or standard catheters (standard group). Catheter colonization was defined as the growth of >or=1,000 colony-forming units in culture of the intravascular tip of the catheter by the vortexing method. Diagnosis of catheter-related infection was performed by an independent and blinded expert committee. RESULTS: A total of 320 catheters were studied in the silver group and 297 in the standard group. Characteristics of the patients, insertion site, duration of catheterization (median, 11 vs. 10 days), and other risk factors for infection were similar in the two groups. Colonization of the catheter occurred in 47 (14.7%) vs. 36 (12.1%) catheters in the silver and the standard groups (p = .35), for an incidence of 11.2 and 9.4 per 1,000 catheter days, respectively. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was recorded in eight (2.5%) vs. eight (2.7%) catheters in the silver and the standard groups (p = .88), for an incidence of 1.9 and 2.1 per 1,000 catheter days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of silver-impregnated multi-lumen catheters in adult intensive care patients is not associated with a lower rate of colonization than the use of standard multi-lumen catheters.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Estado Terminal , Micoses/prevenção & controle , Prata , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micoses/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Blood ; 103(8): 3208-15, 2004 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15070704

RESUMO

The diagnostic procedure of chronic pulmonary opacities may envisage the search for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Previous retrospective studies have shown that clonality analysis of bronchoalveolar B lymphocytes could reflect the clonality of pulmonary lymphocytes. Our objective was to define the diagnostic usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) B-lymphocyte clonality analysis in the setting of a clinical suspicion of both primary and secondary pulmonary lymphoma. A prospective BAL fluid B-cell clonality analysis was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 106 consecutive patients presenting with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary NHL. Diagnosis was pulmonary B-cell lymphoma for 22 patients (13 primary and 9 secondary). When compared, pulmonary biopsy and BAL fluid have clonal identity. The detection of a strong B-cell clonal population in BAL fluid was associated with the diagnosis of pulmonary NHL (P <.0001), with a 97% specificity and a 95% negative predictive value. Thus, the absence of a dominant B-cell clone detection in BAL fluid could help to dismiss invasive investigations of pulmonary lesions. The detection of a dominant B-cell clone would lead to the performance of a pulmonary biopsy to get histologic diagnosis in primary pulmonary lymphoma and, by contrast, would avoid the need for biopsy in the setting of a secondary pulmonary lymphoma.


Assuntos
Linfócitos B/imunologia , Regiões Determinantes de Complementaridade/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Alvéolos Pulmonares/imunologia , Alvéolos Pulmonares/patologia , Linfócitos B/patologia , Sequência de Bases , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/imunologia , Células Clonais/imunologia , Células Clonais/patologia , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/genética , Linfoma não Hodgkin/imunologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/patologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa