Impact of the endovascular revolution on vascular training through analysis of national data case reports.

BACKGROUND: In the last couple of decades, there has been a shift in use of endovascular procedures in vascular surgery. We aim to examine the impact of this endovascular shift on vascular trainees, determine whether the surgical experiences of trainees in the integrated residency and fellowship program changed over time, and identify differences between the two training paradigms. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education National Data Case Logs for the vascular surgery fellowship (1999-2021) and integrated residency (2012-2021) programs. Every procedure was categorized as open or endovascular, then designated into the following subcategories: thoracic aneurysm repairs, cerebrovascular, abdominal aneurysm repairs, venous, vascular access, peripheral arterial disease, visceral, or miscellaneous. We compared the prevalence of open and endovascular cases in the fellowship and integrated residency using data from overlapping years (2012-2021). In addition, we compared the mean number of cases per trainee per year within designated time intervals. The vascular surgery fellowship was grouped into three intervals: 1999 to 2006, 2006 to 2013, and 2013 to 2021; the integrated vascular surgery residency was grouped into two intervals: 2012 to 2017 and 2017 to 2021. Data were standardized to represent the average number of cases per trainee per year. RESULTS: Within the fellowship, we found a 362.37% increase in endovascular procedures (mean, 56.80 ± 32.57 vs 262.63 ± 9.91; P < .001), although there was only a 32.47% increase in open procedures (220.19 ± 4.55 vs 291.68 ± 8.20) between the first and last time intervals. There was a decrease in abdominal aneurysm repair (24.46 ± 7.30 vs 13.85 ± 0.58; P < .001) and visceral (6.41 ± 0.44 vs 5.80 ± 0.42; P = .039) open procedures. For the integrated residency, there was an increase in open procedures by 8.52% (352.18 ± 8.23 vs 382.20 ± 5.84; P < .001). Residents had greater total, open, and endovascular procedures per year than fellows (all P < .001). Chief residents had approximately one-half as many cases as vascular fellows per year. Fellows performed more open abdominal aneurysm repair (14.04 ± 0.80 vs 12.40 ± 1.32; P = .007) and visceral (5.83 ± 0.41 vs 4.88 ± 0.46; P > .001) procedures than residents. Overall, 52% to 53% of cases performed by trainees per year were open procedures in both the fellowship and integrated residency (288.56 ± 12.10 vs 261.27 ± 10.13, 365.52 ± 17.23 vs 319.58 ± 6.62; both P < .001). Within the subcategories, only cerebrovascular, vascular access, and miscellaneous had more open procedures performed per trainee. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgery training has incorporated new endovascular techniques and technologies while maintaining operative training in open procedures. Despite changes in vascular surgery training, trainees are still performing more open procedures than endovascular procedures per year. However, there are evolving deficits in specific types of procedures.

Contraindications to tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis for acute lower extremity ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Previous randomized prospective trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of transcatheter tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) thrombolysis in treating acute limb ischemia (ALI) compared to conventional surgery. These pivotal trials have also highlighted contraindications for these procedures. Given recent advancements in techniques and technology, our aim is to reassess the relevance of these contraindications in contemporary practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was performed utilizing the inpatient medical records of consecutive individuals who underwent tPA treatment for acute limb ischemia (ALI) from September 2016 to April 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients aged 18 and above displaying clinical symptoms and imaging evidence of ALI within 14 days. All patients received tPA with suction thrombectomy following the fast-track thrombolysis protocol. In cases where a persistent thrombus or stenosis was detected, catheter-directed thrombolysis was considered overnight, and patients underwent angiography and reassessment in the operating room subsequently. RESULTS: Patients were classified into two groups based on the STILE trial's established contraindications for endovascular treatment in acute limb ischemia (ALI). If a patient had any of these contraindications, they were placed in the contraindicated group. This resulted in 24 patients (32%) in the contraindicated group and 52 patients (68%) in the non-contraindicated group. No statistically significant demographic variations were observed between these groups. Contraindications in our study included uncontrolled hypertension (12/24, 50%), recent invasive procedures (7/27, 29%), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months (3/24, 12%), and intracranial malformation/neoplasms (2/24, 8%). Three patients within the non-contraindicated group experienced bleeding complications: two with puncture site bleeds and one with nasal bleeding. In contrast, one patient in the contraindicated group had transient postoperative hematuria. There were no significant differences in bleeding complications observed between the two groups (p = .771). Additionally, no amputations were observed within our population. CONCLUSIONS: In light of our study results and advancements in endovascular therapies, we can now safely and efficiently treat patients who were previously considered contraindicated for such treatments. It is essential to individualize treatments and carefully balance the risks and benefits of endovascular versus open surgical revascularization for these patients. Additionally, we believe that the nearly 30-year-old guidelines for endovascular therapies need to be revisited and updated to align with modern technology.