An Update on Pharmacologic Management of Neonatal Hypotension: When, Why, and Which Medication.

Anti-hypotensive treatment, which includes dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, milrinone, vasopressin, terlipressin, levosimendan, and glucocorticoids, is a long-established intervention in neonates with arterial hypotension (AH). However, there are still gaps in knowledge and issues that need clarification. The main questions and challenges that neonatologists face relate to the reference ranges of arterial blood pressure in presumably healthy neonates in relation to gestational and postnatal age; the arterial blood pressure level that potentially affects perfusion of critical organs; the incorporation of targeted echocardiography and near-infrared spectroscopy for assessing heart function and cerebral perfusion in clinical practice; the indication, timing, and choice of medication for each individual patient; the limited randomized clinical trials in neonates with sometimes conflicting results; and the sparse data regarding the potential effect of early hypotension or anti-hypotensive medications on long-term neurodevelopment. In this review, after a short review of AH definitions used in neonates and existing data on pathophysiology of AH, we discuss currently available data on pharmacokinetic and hemodynamic effects, as well as the effectiveness and safety of anti-hypotensive medications in neonates. In addition, data on the comparisons between anti-hypotensive medications and current suggestions for the main indications of each medication are discussed.

Antibiotics, Analgesic Sedatives, and Antiseizure Medications Frequently Used in Critically Ill Neonates: A Narrative Review.

Antibiotic, analgesic sedative, and antiseizure medications are among the most commonly used medications in preterm/sick neonates, who are at high risk of nosocomial infections, central nervous system complications, and are exposed to numerous painful/stressful procedures. These severe and potentially life-threatening complications may have serious short- and long-term consequences and should be prevented and/or promptly treated. The reported variability in the medications used in neonates indicates the lack of adequate neonatal studies regarding their effectiveness and safety. Important obstacles contributing to inadequate studies in preterm/sick infants include difficulties in obtaining parental consent, physicians' unwillingness to recruit preterm infants, the off-label use of many medications in neonates, and other scientific and ethical concerns. This review is an update on the use of antimicrobials (antifungals), analgesics (sedatives), and antiseizure medications in neonates, focusing on current evidence or knowledge gaps regarding their pharmacokinetics, indications, safety, dosage, and evidence-based guidelines for their optimal use in neonates. We also address the effects of early antibiotic use on the intestinal microbiome and its association with long-term immune-related diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopment (ND). Recommendations for empirical treatment and the emergence of pathogen resistance to antimicrobials and antifungals are also presented. Finally, future perspectives on the prevention, modification, or reversal of antibiotic resistance are discussed.

Intertemporal Improvement in Physicians' Perceptions of the Short-Term Adverse Outcomes of Neonatal Pain: Results of a Two-Time-Point National Survey.

Pain in early life may seriously impact neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether the perceptions of physicians working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of the short-term adverse outcomes associated with neonatal pain have changed over a 20-year period. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 117 and 145 neonatologists, pediatricians, and fellows working in level III NICUs in 2000 (T1) and 2019 (T2), respectively. The questionnaire consisted of four domains, including the central nervous, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, as well as "other systems" (metabolic/endocrine system, growth, and general condition), with 21 total items overall. Although the proportion of positive (correct) responses to the total and system-specific domain scores was significantly higher at T2 than T1, the knowledge of certain short-term adverse outcomes was suboptimal even at T2. Adjustment for cofactors confirmed the independent association of the survey time-point with the total and system-specific domain scores. Moreover, NICU type was an independent significant factor associated with the adjusted total and central nervous system scores, while young doctors had a better knowledge of adverse cardiovascular effects. Conclusions: The perceptions of NICU physicians concerning the short-term outcomes associated with neonatal pain have significantly improved over the past 20 years, although remaining knowledge gaps mandate ongoing efforts to achieve an improvement in neonatal care.

Gastric Fluid Metabolomics Predicting the Need for Surfactant Replacement Therapy in Very Preterm Infants Results of a Case-Control Study.

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a major morbidity of prematurity. In this case-control study, we prospectively evaluated whether untargeted metabolomic analysis (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) of the gastric fluid could predict the need for surfactant in very preterm neonates. 43 infants with RDS necessitating surfactant (cases) were compared with 30 infants who were not treated with surfactant (controls). Perinatal-neonatal characteristics were recorded. Significant differences in gastric fluid metabolites (L-proline, L-glycine, L-threonine, acetyl-L-serine) were observed between groups, but none could solely predict surfactant administration with high accuracy. Univariate analysis revealed significant predictors of surfactant administration involving gastric fluid metabolites (L-glycine, acetyl-L-serine) and clinical parameters (gestational age, Apgar scores, intubation in the delivery room). Multivariable models were constructed for significant clinical variables as well as for the combination of clinical variables and gastric fluid metabolites. The AUC value of the first model was 0.69 (95% CI 0.57-0.81) and of the second, 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.86), in which acetyl-L-serine and intubation in the delivery room were found to be significant predictors of surfactant therapy. This investigation adds to the current knowledge of biomarkers in preterm neonates with RDS, but further research is required to assess the predictive value of gastric fluid metabolomics in this field.

Off-label Use of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Real-life Experience and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Multi/extensively drug-resistant bacterial infections have recently increased and new antimicrobial options are needed for difficult-to-treat infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has been approved for patients 3 months to 18 years of age, but real-life data on its off-label use in neonates and young infants are still scarce. MATERIALS: We report demographic, clinical and microbiologic data as well as outcome and safety of all cases of infants treated with CZA between January 1, 2021 and September 30, 2022 in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. We also review all neonatal cases previously reported. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients [17 males, with median gestational age 29 +2 (IQR 6 +6 ) weeks] received 31 CZA courses at a dose of 20-50 mg/kg/dose of ceftazidime q8h for suspected or proved multi/extensively drug-resistant infections. Median postnatal age at the onset of treatment was 44 days (IQR: 94 days). Twelve bacteremias, 2 urinary tract infections and 1 ventilator-acquired pneumonia were recorded. Twelve (39%) treatments were targeted, while 19 (61%) were empirically started due to known colonization with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria. All patients had received multiple antibiotics prior and concomitantly with CZA. The most common pathogen identified at targeted administrations was carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (83%). No serious adverse events attributed to the drug were detected. Twenty-one courses of CZA administration to 20 neonates with a median gestational age of 28.5 (IQR 3.5) weeks were previously reported without significant related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable clinical and microbiologic responses in neonatal intensive care unit patients treated with CZA off-label were observed without significant and unexpected adverse events in critically ill neonates.

Effect of Cerebral Oximetry-Guided Treatment on Brain Injury in Preterm Infants as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Term Equivalent Age: An Ancillary SafeBoosC-III Study.

INTRODUCTION: The SafeBoosC-III trial investigated the effect of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment in the first 72 h after birth on mortality and severe brain injury diagnosed by cranial ultrasound in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). This ancillary study evaluated the effect of cerebral oximetry on global brain injury as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at term equivalent age (TEA). METHODS: MRI scans were obtained between 36 and 44.9 weeks PMA. The Kidokoro score was independently evaluated by two blinded assessors. The intervention effect was assessed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for median difference and 95% Hodges-Lehmann (HL) confidence intervals (CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement between the assessors. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients from 8 centers were included, of whom 121 underwent MRI at TEA (75.6% of alive patients): 57 in the cerebral oximetry group and 64 in the usual care group. There was an excellent correlation between the assessors for the Kidokoro score (ICC agreement: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). The results showed no significant differences between the cerebral oximetry group (median 2, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-4) and the usual care group (median 3, IQR: 1-4; median difference -1 to 0, 95% HLCI: -1 to 0; p value 0.1196). CONCLUSIONS: In EPI, the use of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment did not lead to significant alterations in brain injury, as determined by MRI at TEA. The strong correlation between the assessors highlights the potential of the Kidokoro score in multicenter trials.