RESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical evaluation and cost analysis of mitomycin-C-augmented PreserFlo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study across 3 teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 134 consecutive eyes of 129 patients (70 undergoing MicroShunt, 64 trabeculectomy). METHODS: Primary and secondary glaucoma cases with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) were included. Neovascular glaucoma and surgery combined with cataract extraction were excluded. The cost analysis used results from the clinical study to estimate operative costs (equipment and staff costs) and postoperative costs (follow-up visits, nonglaucoma medications, and postoperative procedures) per eye for PreserFlo and trabeculectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary clinical outcome measure was surgical failure (defined as IOP > 21 mmHg or < 20% reduction from baseline, IOP ≤ 5 mmHg, reoperation, or loss of light perception) or qualified and complete success (with or without medication) at 18 months. Secondary measures were IOP, glaucoma medications, visual acuity, mean deviation, time to cessation of steroid drops, complications, surgical time, follow-up visits, postoperative interventions, and reoperations. The cost analysis evaluated costs of PreserFlo compared with trabeculectomy. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar, except for more non-White patients in the trabeculectomy group (51% Black and Asian vs. 32% MicroShunt, P = 0.02) and more cases with prior ab externo glaucoma surgery in the MicroShunt group (19% vs. 3% in the trabeculectomy group, P = 0.004). Overall, 59% of eyes had primary open-angle glaucoma. Mean follow-up was 19.9 months for both groups. At 18 months, surgical failure was 25% for MicroShunt compared with 35% for trabeculectomy (P = 0.18). Failure in MicroShunt cases was due to inadequate IOP reduction (84%) or reoperation for glaucoma (16%). Failure in trabeculectomy cases was due to inadequate IOP reduction (58%), persistent hypotony (29%), or reoperation for glaucoma (13%). Combined blebitis and endophthalmitis rate was 1.4% for MicroShunt and 3.1% for trabeculectomy. Cost analysis showed a savings of £245 to £566 per eye in the MicroShunt group, driven mostly by reduced postoperative procedures and follow-up visits. This is in contrast to prior randomized controlled trial data reporting the incremental cost of $2058 of PreserFlo over trabeculectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of introducing PreserFlo MicroShunt surgery showed it was safer than trabeculectomy and is a cost-saving and effective option that offers potential to free up highly limited National Health Service resources. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
RESUMO
We describe 4 cases of eyes initially treated with phacoemulsification and iStent trabecular microbypass (Glaukos Corporation). These patients subsequently required further surgery and were successfully treated with the removal of the iStent device followed by gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT), using the iTrack catheter (Ellex Medical Lasers Ltd). Three of the cases had prior first-generation iStent (G1), and 1 had prior second-generation iStent (G2). This case series demonstrates that in selected cases, a further angle procedure in the form of a GATT can show efficacy and durability in the medium term. Our patients had controlled intraocular pressures (IOPs) at 1-year post-GATT: 2 on IOP-lowering therapy and 2 without any IOP-lowering medications. Three patients had transient hyphema and 2 with high IOP in the immediate postoperative period. No patients experienced a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity postoperatively. To the best of our knowledge, there is no prior literature describing this surgical strategy. This series demonstrates that GATT could potentially be an effective procedure in the case of a failed initial iStent microtrabecular bypass.