Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Saudi Med ; 39(5): 302-308, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580693

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal masks are increasingly used in place of endotracheal intubation or face masks for maintaining the airway during surgery. OBJECTIVES: Compare the insertion time and other features of the Baska and I-gel masks in patients undergoing general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN: Randomized-controlled, single-blind study. SETTINGS: Urology surgical operating rooms of a tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled concomitant patients whose surgery was expected to last less than two hours. Following premedication and adequate relaxation, subjects were randomly allocated to the I-gel mask or the Baska mask. Computer-generated random numbers were used for randomization with sealed opaque envelopes for allocation concealment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure of the study was the time required for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Also, the number of device placement attempts, the number of postoperative signs and symptoms (cough, breath holding, laryngeal spasm, lip trauma, blood on the mask), and laryngopharyngeal morbidity scores at 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. SAMPLE SIZE: 211 met inclusion criteria, 200 participants completed the study. RESULTS: Compared to I-gel, the Baska mask required a longer time for insertion, and its airway pressure was higher. The median (minimum-maximum) duration of LMA insertion in the Baska and I-gel groups was 14 (6-25) and 7 (5-12) seconds, respectively (z=-10.934; P<.001). The mean (SD) airway pressures were significantly different between the two groups (15.8 [1.9] and 14.9 [1.7] cm/H2O for Baska and I-gel, respectively; t=3.668; P<.001). Seal pressure was not significantly different between the groups (0.08 [0.2] vs. 0.07 [0.2] cm/H2O in the Baska and I-gel groups, respectively, (t=1.35; P=.194). CONCLUSIONS: The Baska and I-gel masks are similar in most respects. Both have reasonably acceptable insertion times and can be used for selected surgical procedures. LIMITATIONS: The requirement for more vigorous training is a limitation of the Baska mask. Results could differ with patients younger than 18 years of age or obese patients. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Not registered.


Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Máscaras Laríngeas , Adulto , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
2.
Case Rep Urol ; 2015: 134651, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26491598

RESUMO

Subcutaneous emphysema is a very rare and good-natured complication after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). It has been reported as colon perforation, diverticulitis, and bladder perforation associated complication previously. We report the first case of a wide subcutaneous emphysema due to microperforations of prostatic capsule, without a bladder perforation after TURP. Any sign of clinic situation should lead to ceasing of the procedure immediately; otherwise, it can cause a life-threatening problem of abdominal compartment syndrome.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa