A novel sulfur mustard (HD) vapor inhalation exposure model of pulmonary toxicity for the efficacy evaluation of candidate medical countermeasures.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel inhalation exposure system capable of delivering a controlled inhaled HD dose through an endotracheal tube to anesthetized rats to investigate the lung pathophysiology and evaluate potential medical countermeasures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Target HD vapor exposures were generated by a temperature-controlled vapor generator, while concentration was monitored near real-time by gas chromatography. Animal breathing parameters were monitored real-time by in-line EMKA/SciReq pulmonary analysis system. Individual exposures were halted when the target inhaled doses were achieved. Animals were observed daily for clinical observations and lethality with scheduled termination at 28 days post-exposure. Upon scheduled or unscheduled death, animals underwent a gross necropsy and lung and trachea were collected for histopathology. RESULTS: Controlled HD concentrations ranged from 60 to 320 mg/m3. Delivered inhaled doses range from 0.3 to 3.20 mg/kg with administered doses within 3% of the target. The 28-day inhaled LD50 is 0.80 mg/kg (95% CI = 0.42-1.18 mg/kg). Post exposure respiratory abnormalities were observed across all dose levels though the higher dose levels had earlier onset and higher frequency of occurrence. Histopathologic alterations were not qualitatively altered in accordance with dose but instead showed a relationship to an animals' time of death, with early deaths demonstrating acute damage and later deaths displaying signs of repair. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This novel exposure system administers targeted HD inhaled doses to generate a small animal model that can be used to evaluate physiological toxicities of inhaled HD on the lungs and for evaluation of potential medical countermeasure treatments.

Extractive sampling and optical remote sensing of F100 aircraft engine emissions.

The Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) has initiated several programs to develop and evaluate techniques to characterize emissions from military aircraft to meet increasingly stringent regulatory requirements. This paper describes the results of a recent field study using extractive and optical remote sensing (ORS) techniques to measure emissions from six F-15 fighter aircraft. Testing was performed between November 14 and 16, 2006 on the trim-pad facility at Tyndall Air Force Base in Panama City, FL. Measurements were made on eight different F100 engines, and the engines were tested on-wing of in-use aircraft. A total of 39 test runs were performed at engine power levels that ranged from idle to military power. The approach adopted for these tests involved extractive sampling with collocated ORS measurements at a distance of approximately 20-25 nozzle diameters downstream of the engine exit plane. The emission indices calculated for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, and several volatile organic compounds showed very good agreement when comparing the extractive and ORS sampling methods.

Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene-chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20-40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases.