Medical students' perceptions of unethical conduct at one medical school.

PURPOSE: To assess medical students' perceptions of the ethical environment across four years of medical school. METHOD: In the spring of 1996, the authors distributed a questionnaire to all four classes at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine. The students provided demographic information and information about their exposures to or participation in unethical situations. Results were analyzed using multiple analysis of variance, univariate analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, and cross-tabulations. RESULTS: The response rate was 71%. The students reported that exposures to unethical behavior started early and continued to increase with each year in school. For example, 35% of the first-year students reported observing unethical conduct by residents or attending physicians. This percentage rose to 90% of the fourth-year students. The authors found no significant relationship between demographic variables other than the year in school and the ethical dilemma variables. CONCLUSION: Medical students face perceived ethical dilemmas beginning as early as the first year of medical school. Thus ethics instruction must begin in the freshman year. In addition, there must be changes to the environment in which clinical education is conducted to enhance the positive enculturation of students into the medical profession.

An ethical paradox: the effect of unethical conduct on medical students' values.

OBJECTIVE: To report the ethical development of medical students across four years of education at one medical school. DESIGN AND SETTING: A questionnaire was distributed to all four classes at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine during the Spring of 1996. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and three students provided demographic information as well as information concerning their ethical development both as current medical students and future interns. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Results were analyzed using cross-tabulations, correlations, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Results suggested that the observation of and participation in unethical conduct may have disparaging effects on medical students' codes of ethics with 35% of the total sample (24% of first years rising to 55% of fourth years) stating that derogatory comments made by residents/attendings, either in the patient's presence or absence, were "sometimes" or "often" appropriate. However, approximately 70% of the sample contended that their personal code of ethics had not changed since beginning medical school and would not change as a resident. CONCLUSIONS: Results may represent an internal struggle that detracts from the medical school experience, both as a person and as a doctor. Our goal as educators is to alter the educational environment so that acceptance of such behaviour is not considered part of becoming a physician.