Basomedial amygdala activity in mice reflects specific and general aversion uncontrollability.

Learning adaptive behaviour to control aversion is a major brain function. Detecting the absence of control is also important, although chronic uncontrollable aversion can impact maladaptively on stimulus processing in general. The mouse basomedial amygdala (BMA) contributes to aversion processing with high BMA activity associated with active behavioural responding. The overall aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between aversion (un)controllability, BMA activity and behaviour. Fibre photometry of GCaMP6-expressing BMA neuron populations was applied in freely behaving adult male mice during exposure to mild electrical shocks, and effects of specific or general (un)controllability were investigated. In a discrete learned helplessness (LH) effect paradigm, mice underwent discrete sessions of pre-exposure to either escapable shock (ES) or inescapable shock (IES) followed by an escape test. IES mice acquired fewer escape attempts than ES mice, and this co-occurred with higher aversion-related BMA activity in the IES group. After 30 days, ES and IES mice were allocated equally to either chronic social stress (CSS)-exposure to continuous uncontrollable social aversion-or control handling (CON), and on days 5 and 15 underwent an IES session. CSS mice made fewer escape attempts than CON mice, and this was now associated with lower aversion-related BMA activity in the CSS group. These findings suggest that mouse BMA activity is higher when discrete aversion is uncontrollable but becomes lower following chronic uncontrollable aversion exposure. Therefore, BMA activity could be a neural marker of adaptive and maladaptive states consequent to specific and general uncontrollability, respectively.

Establishing operant conflict tests for the translational study of anxiety in mice.

RATIONALE: In conflict-based anxiety tests, rodents decide between actions with simultaneous rewarding and aversive outcomes. In humans, computerised operant conflict tests have identified response choice, latency, and vigour as distinct behavioural components. Animal operant conflict tests for measurement of these components would facilitate translational study. OBJECTIVES: In C57BL/6 mice, two operant conflict tests for measurement of response choice, latency, and vigour were established, and effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDZ) thereon investigated. METHODS: Mice were moderately diet-restricted to increase sucrose reward salience. A 1-lever test required responding under medium-effort reward/threat conditions of variable ratio 2-10 resulting in sucrose at p = 0.7 and footshock at p = 0.3. A 2-lever test mandated a choice between low-effort reward/threat with a fixed-ratio (FR) 2 lever yielding sucrose at p = 0.7 and footshock at p = 0.3 versus high-effort reward/no threat with a FR 20 lever yielding sucrose at p = 1. RESULTS: In the 1-lever test, CDZ (7.5 or 15 mg/kg i.p.) reduced post-trial pause (response latency) following either sucrose or footshock and reduced inter-response interval (increased response vigour) after footshock. In the 2-lever test, mice favoured the FR2 lever and particularly at post-reward trials. CDZ increased choice of FR2 and FR20 responding after footshock, reduced response latency overall, and increased response vigour at the FR2 lever and after footshock specifically. CONCLUSIONS: Mouse operant conflict tests, especially 2-lever choice, allow for the translational study of distinct anxiety components. CDZ influences each component by ameliorating the impact of both previous punishment and potential future punishment.

Establishing a probabilistic reversal learning test in mice: evidence for the processes mediating reward-stay and punishment-shift behaviour and for their modulation by serotonin.

Valid animal models of psychopathology need to include behavioural readouts informed by human findings. In the probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task, human subjects are confronted with serial reversal of the contingency between two operant stimuli and reward/punishment and, superimposed on this, a low probability (0.2) of punished correct responses/rewarded incorrect responses. In depression, reward-stay and reversals completed are unaffected but response-shift following punished correct response trials, referred to as negative feedback sensitivity (NFS), is increased. The aims of this study were to: establish an operant spatial PRL test appropriate for mice; obtain evidence for the processes mediating reward-stay and punishment-shift responding; and assess effects thereon of genetically- and pharmacologically-altered serotonin (5-HT) function. The study was conducted with wildtype (WT) and heterozygous mutant (HET) mice from a 5-HT transporter (5-HTT) null mutant strain. Mice were mildly food deprived and reward was sugar pellet and punishment was 5-s time out. Mice exhibited high motivation and adaptive reversal performance. Increased probability of punished correct response (PCR) trials per session (p = 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3) led to monotonic decrease in reward-stay and reversals completed, suggesting accurate reward prediction. NFS differed from chance-level at p PCR = 0.1, suggesting accurate punishment prediction, whereas NFS was at chance-level at p = 0.2-0.3. At p PCR = 0.1, HET mice exhibited lower NFS than WT mice. The 5-HTT blocker escitalopram was studied acutely at p PCR = 0.2: a low dose (0.5-1.5 mg/kg) resulted in decreased NFS, increased reward-stay and increased reversals completed, and similarly in WT and HET mice. This study demonstrates that testing PRL in mice can provide evidence on the regulation of reward and punishment processing that is, albeit within certain limits, of relevance to human emotional-cognitive processing, its dysfunction and treatment.