RESUMO
Given the challenge that healthcare related data are being obtained from various sources and in divergent formats there is an emerging need for providing improved and automated techniques and technologies that perform qualification and standardization of these data. The approach presented in this paper introduces a novel mechanism for the cleaning, qualification, and standardization of the collected primary and secondary data types. The latter is realized through the design and implementation of three (3) integrated subcomponents, the Data Cleaner, the Data Qualifier, and the Data Harmonizer that are further evaluated by performing data cleaning, qualification, and harmonization on top of data related to Pancreatic Cancer to further develop enhanced personalized risk assessment and recommendations to individuals.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Tecnologia , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Padrões de ReferênciaRESUMO
In the era of evidence-based medicine, several clinical guidelines were developed, supporting cancer management from diagnosis to treatment and aiming to optimize patient care and hospital resources. Nevertheless, individual patient characteristics and organizational factors may lead to deviations from these standard recommendations during clinical practice. In this context, process mining in healthcare constitutes a valid tool to evaluate conformance of real treatment pathways, extracted from hospital data warehouses as event log, to standard clinical guidelines, translated into computer-interpretable formats. In this study we translate the European Society of Medical Oncology guidelines for rectal cancer treatment into a computer-interpretable format using Pseudo-Workflow formalism (PWF), a language already employed in pMineR software library for Process Mining in Healthcare. We investigate the adherence of a real-world cohort of rectal cancer patients treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, data associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment are extracted from hospital databases in 453 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. PWF enables the easy implementation of guidelines in a computer-interpretable format and visualizations that can improve understandability and interpretability of physicians. Results of the conformance checking analysis on our cohort identify a subgroup of patients receiving a long course treatment that deviates from guidelines due to a moderate increase in radiotherapy dose and an addition of oxaliplatin during chemotherapy treatment. This study demonstrates the importance of PWF to evaluate clinical guidelines adherence and to identify reasons of deviations during a treatment process in a real-world and multidisciplinary setting.