Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
CMAJ ; 185(15): E731-8, 2013 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23939215

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Low Risk Ankle Rule is a validated clinical decision rule that has the potential to safely reduce radiography in children with acute ankle injuries. We performed a phased implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule and evaluated its effectiveness in reducing the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries. METHODS: Six Canadian emergency departments participated in the study from Jan. 1, 2009, to Aug. 31, 2011. At the 3 intervention sites, there were 3 consecutive 26-week phases. In phase 1, no interventions were implemented. In phase 2, we activated strategies to implement the ankle rule, including physician education, reminders and a computerized decision support system. In phase 3, we included only the decision support system. No interventions were introduced at the 3 pair-matched control sites. We examined the management of ankle injuries among children aged 3-16 years. The primary outcome was the proportion of children undergoing radiography. RESULTS: We enrolled 2151 children with ankle injuries, 1055 at intervention and 1096 at control hospitals. During phase 1, the baseline frequency of pediatric ankle radiography at intervention and control sites was 96.5% and 90.2%, respectively. During phase 2, the frequency of ankle radiography decreased significantly at intervention sites relative to control sites (between-group difference -21.9% [95% confidence interval [CI] -28.6% to -15.2%]), without significant differences in patient or physician satisfaction. All effects were sustained in phase 3. The sensitivity of the Low Risk Ankle Rule during implementation was 100% (95% CI 85.4% to 100%), and the specificity was 53.1% (95% CI 48.1% to 58.1%). INTERPRETATION: Implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule in several different emergency department settings reduced the rate of pediatric ankle radiography significantly and safely, without an accompanying change in physician or patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00785876.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Adolescente , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 38(1): 1-13, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757244

RESUMO

Acute musculoskeletal injuries are commonly seen in our emergency departments, and are commonly missed. There are many reasons for more missed injures and a significant one is over-reliance on radiographs. An emergency department orthopedic assessment goes far beyond the radiographs. A focused, yet comprehensive history is vital to understand the forces and mechanism of injury. That injury must be understood in the context of the patient, because older and much younger patients have weaker bone. Finally, the physical examination is instrumental in localizing the pathology and is essential to put radiograph results in the proper clinical context.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Exame Físico/métodos , Radiografia/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Humanos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa