Evaluation of the novel bipolar vessel sealing and cutting device BiCision® in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Energy-based technologies for tissue sealing and cutting are increasingly supplementing current standards used for haemostasis and dissection during laparoscopic surgery. For their safe and efficacious use in clinical practice, these instruments have to guarantee sufficient burst resistance and low thermal damage to adjacent tissue in combination with good cutting characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The novel laparoscopic, bipolar electrosurgical sealing and cutting instrument BiCision® was compared to a commercially available laparoscopic device (EnSeal(™)) on visceral and peripheral arteries and veins in an animal model. RESULTS: For all parameters investigated (burst pressure, cut quality, tissue adhering to the instrument, time needed to seal and cut the vessel and thermal damage), BiCision® was at least as good as EnSeal(™). Regarding the burst pressure, BiCision® was superior over EnSeal(™) in arteries: 600 mmHg (±478) versus 241 (±269) mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001*). In veins, almost equivalent burst pressures of 155 ± 134 mmHg (BiCision®) and 173 ± 139 mmHg (EnSeal(™)) were obtained. CONCLUSION: BiCision® appeared to be as good as or even superior to EnSeal(™). Since EnSeal(™) has already been shown to be safe and has been successfully used in clinical practice, BiCision® is assumed to be as efficient and reliable as EnSeal(™) under pre-clinical conditions.

Thermal conduction, compression, and electrical current--an evaluation of major parameters of electrosurgical vessel sealing in a porcine in vitro model.

Bipolar vessel sealing is pivotal in laparoscopic hemostasis. However, major coaptive desiccation parameters have yet to be investigated in detail. The current investigation aims to study the impact of compressive pressure, thermal conduction, and electrical current effects on seal quality in a randomized, controlled experimental trial in an in vitro porcine model of vessel sealing. A total of 106 porcine vessels were sealed with either bipolar current or thermal conduction. Compressive pressure on the sealing site and maximum temperature were varied and monitored. Additionally, the longitudinal vessel tension was measured. The burst pressure of the resulting seal was determined as an indicator of seal quality. In bipolar coaptation, seal quality depends on the compressive pressure applied to the coagulation site in both arteries and veins. The optimal pressure interval was around 270 mN/mm2 for arteries and 200 mN/mm2 for veins. Deviation from these optimal pressures towards low and high extremes led to significantly fewer successful seals. We also found that both maximum coaptation temperature and vessel shrinking correlated with the seal quality. This correlation was reciprocal in arteries and veins. Thermal conduction alone was less successful than sealing by bipolar current. Therefore, compressive pressure during coaptation determines the seal quality. Upper and lower pressure boundaries for safe coaptation exist for both arteries and veins. Vessel sealing by thermal conduction without electrical current effects is possible but represents a less effective method for coaptation. These findings have implications for the rational design of new electrosurgical instruments.