Validation of electrocardiographic criteria for identifying left ventricular dysfunction in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Eleven criteria correlating electrocardiogram (ECG) findings with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have been previously published. These have not been compared head-to-head in a single study. We studied their value as a screening test to identify patients with reduced LVEF estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS: ECGs and CMR from 548 patients (age 61 + 11 years, 79% male) with previous myocardial infarction (MI), from the DETERMINE and PRE-DETERMINE studies, were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each criterion for identifying patients with LVEF ≤ 30% and ≤ 40% were studied. A useful screening test should have high sensitivity and NPV. RESULTS: Mean LVEF was 40% (SD = 11%); 264 patients (48.2%) had LVEF ≤ 40%, and 96 patients (17.5%) had LVEF ≤ 30%. Six of 11 criteria were associated with a significant lower LVEF, but had poor sensitivity to identify LVEF ≤ 30% (range 2.1%-55.2%) or LVEF ≤ 40% (1.1%-51.1%); NPVs were good for LVEF ≤ 30% (range 82.8%-85.9%) but not for LVEF ≤ 40% (range 52.1%-60.6%). Goldberger's third criterion (RV4/SV4 < 1) and combinations of maximal QRS duration > 124 ms + either Goldberger's third criterion or Goldberger's first criterion (SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 ≥ 3.5 mV) had high specificity (95.4%-100%) for LVEF ≤ 40%, although seen in only 48 (8.8%) patients; predictive values were similar on subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: None of the ECG criteria qualified as a good screening test. Three criteria had high specificity for LVEF ≤ 40%, although seen in < 9% of patients. Whether other ECG criteria can better identify LV dysfunction remains to be determined.

Estimating Myocardial Infarction Size With a Simple Electrocardiographic Marker Score.

Background Myocardial infarction (MI) size is a key predictor of prognosis in post-MI patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard test for MI quantification, but the ECG is less expensive and more widely available. We sought to quantify the relationship between ECG markers and cardiovascular magnetic resonance infarct size. Methods and Results Patients with prior MI enrolled in the DETERMINE (Defibrillators to Reduce Risk by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation) and PRE-DETERMINE Trial and Registry were included. ECG leads were analyzed for markers of MI: Q waves, fragmented QRS, and T wave inversion. DETERMINE Score=number of leads with [Q waves×2]+[fragmented QRS]+[T wave inversion]. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size as a percentage of left ventricular mass (MI%) were quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The Modified Selvester Score estimates MI size from 37 ECG criteria. In 551 patients (aged 62.1±10.9 years, 79% men, and LVEF=40.3±11.0%), MI% increased as the number of ECG markers increased (P<0.001). By univariable linear regression, the DETERMINE Score (range 0-26) estimated MI% (R2=0.18, P<0.001) with an accuracy approaching that of LVEF (R2=0.22, P<0.001) and higher than the Modified Selvester Score (R2=0.09, P<0.001). By multivariable linear regression, addition of the DETERMINE Score improved estimation of MI% over LVEF alone (P<0.001) and over Modified Selvester Score alone (P<0.001). Conclusions In patients with prior MI, a simple ECG score estimates infarct size and improves infarct size estimation over LVEF alone. Because infarct size is a powerful prognostic indicator, the DETERMINE Score holds promise as a simple and inexpensive risk assessment tool.

Prognostic value and temporal behavior of the planar QRS-T angle in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The planar QRS-T angle can be easily obtained from standard 12-lead ECGs, but its predictive ability is not established. We sought to determine the predictive ability of the planar QRS-T angle in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and to assess QRS-T angle behavior over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline QRS-T angles from 455 patients in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial were measured. All patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association class I to III heart failure, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular ectopy. The primary end point (a composite of total mortality, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) occurred in 25 of 172 patients (14.5%) with a QRS-T angle < or =90 degrees and in 72 of 283 patients (25.4%) with a QRS-T angle >90 degrees (hazard ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 3.05; P=0.002). A QRS-T angle >90 degrees remained a significant predictor of the primary end point (P=0.039) after adjustment for treatment group, age, gender, QRS duration, left bundle-branch block, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class III, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus. The secondary end point (total mortality) occurred in 17 of the 172 patients (9.9%) with a QRS-T angle < or =90 degrees and in 49 of the 283 patients (17.3%) with a QRS-T angle >90 degrees (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 3.10; P=0.016). A sample of 152 patients with multiple follow-up ECGs was analyzed to assess temporal QRS-T angle behavior. Changes in the QRS-T angle correlated with changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS duration over time (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A planar QRS-T angle >90 degrees is a significant predictor of a composite end point of death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or resuscitated cardiac arrest in nonpaced, mild to moderately symptomatic patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy with frequent or complex ventricular ectopy. QRS-T angles changed predictably with left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS duration.

Rationale and design for the Defibrillators to Reduce Risk by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation (DETERMINE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can accurately determine infarct size. Prior studies using indirect methods and CMR to assess infarct size have shown that patients with larger myocardial infarctions have worse prognoses. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have been shown to improve survival among patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, the majority of cardiac arrests occur in patients with higher ejection fractions. METHODS: The Defibrillators To Reduce Risk By Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation study (DETERMINE) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction. The purpose of this trial is to test the hypothesis that patients with an infarct size > or = 10% of LV mass, randomized to ICD plus appropriate medical therapy will have improved survival compared with patients randomized to medical therapy alone. Cine and myocardial delayed contrast CMR will be performed in patients with CAD. The primary endpoint will be death from any cause. At least 10,000 patients with CAD will undergo CMR. The target enrollment is 1,550 patients with an estimated 36-month enrollment period. The patients will be followed up for 24 months after the last patient randomization. During the follow-up period, 330 deaths are estimated to occur. This study is powered to detect a 28% reduction in mortality by ICD therapy. CONCLUSION: The DETERMINE trial will assess the efficacy of ICD therapy to improve survival among patients with CAD, mild-to-moderate LV dysfunction, and infarct size > or = 10% of LV mass as measured by CMR.

Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility predicts subsequent ICD activation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients: a DEFINITE substudy.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether electrophysiologic (EP) inducibility predicts the subsequent occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial. BACKGROUND: Inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias has been widely used as a risk marker to select implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, but is believed not to be predictive in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. METHODS: In DEFINITE, patients randomized to the ICD arm, but not the conventional arm, underwent noninvasive EP testing via the ICD shortly after ICD implantation using up to three extrastimuli at three cycle lengths plus burst pacing. Inducibility was defined as monomorphic or polymorphic VT or VF lasting 15 seconds. Patients were followed for a median of 29 +/- 14 months (interquartile range = 2-41). An independent committee, blinded to inducibility status, characterized the rhythm triggering ICD shocks. RESULTS: Inducibility, found in 29 of 204 patients (VT in 13, VF in 16), was associated with diabetes (41.4% vs 20.6%, P = 0.014) and a slightly higher ejection fraction (23.2 +/- 5.9 vs 20.5 +/- 5.7, P = 0.021). In follow-up, 34.5% of the inducible group (10 of 29) experienced ICD therapy for VT or VF or arrhythmic death versus 12.0% (21 of 175) noninducible patients (hazard ratio = 2.60, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In DEFINITE patients, inducibility of either VT or VF was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD therapy for VT or VF, and should be one factor considered in risk stratifying nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and quality of life: results from the defibrillators in nonischemic cardiomyopathy treatment evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: The Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation study demonstrated that implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and an ejection fraction of 35% or less, with no statistically significant decrease in overall mortality. The impact of ICD placement and shock on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in this population is unknown. METHODS: The 12-Item Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire were administered to 458 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, an ejection fraction of 35% or less, and either nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or 10 or more premature ventricular depolarizations per hour at baseline, 1 month after randomization, and every 3 months thereafter throughout the trial. The subjects were randomized to an ICD or standard medical therapy. Outcomes were compared using hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, there were no significant differences in HRQL throughout the trial between patients randomized to an ICD or standard medical therapy. However, in patients with 1 or more ICD shocks, HRQL declined 0.5 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- SD) points per shock on the emotional scale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (P = .04) and 1.0 +/- 0.5 points per shock on the mental component score of the 12-Item Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, HRQL was not affected by ICD implantation in patients in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation study. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock was associated with a reduction in some measures of HRQL, but the effects were unlikely to result in a clinically observable alteration until 5 or more shocks were experienced.

Are implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks a surrogate for sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachyarrhythmias long enough to cause implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks are generally thought to progress to cardiac arrest. In previous ICD trials, shocks have been considered an appropriate surrogate for sudden cardiac death (SCD) because the number of shocks has been thought to be equivalent to the mortality excess in patients without ICDs. The practice of equating ICD shocks with mortality is controversial and has not been validated critically. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of ICD therapy in 458 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients were randomized to receive standard medical therapy (STD) or STD plus an ICD. Shock electrograms were reviewed, and the cause of death was evaluated by a separate blinded events committee. There were 15 SCD or cardiac arrests in the STD group and only 3 in the ICD arm. In contrast, of the 229 patients randomized to an ICD, 33 received 70 appropriate ICD shocks. Patients in the ICD arm were more likely to have an arrhythmic event (ICD shock plus SCD) than patients in the STD arm (hazard ratio 2.12, 95% CI 1.153 to 3.893, P=0.013). The number of arrhythmic events when one includes syncope as a potential arrhythmic event was similar in both groups (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.774 to 1.865, P=0.414). Approximately the same number of total events was noted in each arm when we compared syncope plus SCD/cardiac arrest in the STD arm with SCD plus ICD shocks plus syncope in the ICD arm. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate ICD shocks occur more frequently than SCD in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. This suggests that episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia frequently terminate spontaneously in such patients.

Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy are at substantial risk for sudden death from cardiac causes. However, the value of prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to prevent sudden death in such patients is unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 458 patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 36 percent, and premature ventricular complexes or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. A total of 229 patients were randomly assigned to receive standard medical therapy, and 229 to receive standard medical therapy plus a single-chamber ICD. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a mean (+/-SD) of 29.0+/-14.4 months. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 21 percent. The vast majority of patients were treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (86 percent) and beta-blockers (85 percent). There were 68 deaths: 28 in the ICD group, as compared with 40 in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.06; P=0.08). The mortality rate at two years was 14.1 percent in the standard-therapy group (annual mortality rate, 7 percent) and 7.9 percent in the ICD group. There were 17 sudden deaths from arrhythmia: 3 in the ICD group, as compared with 14 in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.71; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe, nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy who were treated with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator significantly reduced the risk of sudden death from arrhythmia and was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the risk of death from any cause.

Associations of Sex Hormones With Surface Electrocardiogram J Point Amplitude in Healthy Volunteers.

Gender differences in J point height exist. Previous studies suggest male sex hormones mediate effects on cardiovascular disease through myocardial repolarization. Our objective was to assess whether male and female sex hormones are associated with J point amplitude in healthy subjects. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 475 healthy, mixed racial population of men, and premenopausal women (age 33 ± 9 years, 56% male). Baseline J point amplitude (JPA) was obtained from continuous surface electrocardiograms. Plasma testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone, estrone, 17-estradiol (E2), and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured. A free testosterone index (FTI) was calculated. Multivariate regression analysis stratified by gender and electrocardiographic lead location was used to determine independent predictors of maximum JPA. Regression analysis demonstrated FTI levels were positively associated with JPA in lateral leads (ß = +0.01, p <0.05) in men but not in women. Total testosterone was positively associated with anterior electrocardiographic lead JPA in women (ß = +0.5, p <0.02), but not in men. E2 was positively associated with inferior lead JPA (ß = +1.2, p <0.03) in men but not in women. Total testosterone levels were positively associated with JPA in anterior leads (ß = +0.054, p <0.05) in women. Male volunteers in the highest tertile of FTI demonstrated greater lateral JPA compared with the lowest tertile (p <0.05). Women in the highest tertile of FTI demonstrated greater anterior lead JPA compared with the lowest tertile (p <0.05). In conclusion, in a young, healthy population, the female sex hormone E2 and an FTI are independent determinants of JPA in men, whereas T is associated with JPA in women.

Preserved heart rate variability identifies low-risk patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: results from the DEFINITE trial.

BACKGROUND: The recent expansion of indications for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in subjects with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy has raised concerns about the cost-effectiveness of this therapy. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify low-risk patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy who may not require prophylactic ICD placement. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 274 participants in the Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial, a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the role of prophylactic ICD placement in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patients underwent 24-hour Holter recording for analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). The primary HRV variable was the standard deviation of normal R-R intervals (SDNN). Patients with atrial fibrillation and frequent ventricular ectopy (>25% of beats) were excluded from HRV analysis (23% of patients). SDNN was categorized in tertiles, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival in the three tertiles and excluded patients. RESULTS: The study population was 73% male, with a mean age of 59 +/- 12 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 21% +/- 6%. After 3-year follow-up, significant differences in mortality rates were observed: SDNN >113 ms: 0 (0%), SDNN 81-113 ms: 5 (7%), SDNN <81 ms: 7 (10%), excluded patients: 11 (17%) (P = .03). There were no deaths in the tertile with SDNN >113 ms regardless of treatment assignment (ICD vs control). CONCLUSION: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and preserved HRV have an excellent prognosis and may not benefit from prophylactic ICD placement. Patients with severely depressed HRV and patients who are excluded from HRV analysis because of atrial fibrillation and frequent ventricular ectopy have the highest mortality.

Significance of follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction measurements in the Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation trial (DEFINITE).

BACKGROUND: As left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may improve, worsen, or remain the same over time, patients' prognosis may also be expected to change because of the change in LVEF, among other factors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of LVEF change on outcome in the Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial. METHODS: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF<36%, history of symptomatic heart failure, and the presence of significant ventricular ectopic activity were enrolled in the DEFINITE trial. Follow-up LVEF measurements were obtained annually in only a minority (17%) of trial participants. This study therefore evaluated survival and arrhythmic end points in patients whose LVEF was reassessed between 90 and 730 days after enrollment. RESULTS: During the 90-730-day postrandomization period, 187 of 449 (42%) enrolled patients who survived at least 90 days had at least 1 follow-up LVEF measurement; these patients were younger and white; had diabetes, better 6-minute walk test results, and higher BMI; were more likely to have appropriate shocks; and had fewer deaths compared to those without follow-up LVEF measurements. Patients whose LVEF improved had reduced mortality compared to patients whose LVEF decreased (hazard ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.39; P = .001). Survival free of appropriate shocks was not significantly related to LVEF improvement during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LVEF improvement was associated with improved survival, but not with a significant decrease in appropriate shocks. These data highlight that appropriate caution should be exercised not to extrapolate the positive effect of improved LVEF to the elimination of arrhythmic events.

Patients with recently diagnosed nonischemic cardiomyopathy benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether the time from diagnosis to randomization was related to outcome in a clinical trial of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Whether the duration of nonischemic cardiomyopathy is related to arrhythmic risk and the possible benefit of ICD insertion is unknown. METHODS: The Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial randomized 458 patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular ejection fraction <36% to receive standard medical therapy with or without an ICD. Patients were randomized regardless of the duration of known cardiomyopathy as long as a reversible cause of left ventricular dysfunction was not present. Patients were divided into recently and remotely diagnosed nonischemic cardiomyopathy groups based on the time from diagnosis of cardiomyopathy to randomization. To categorize patients, cut points of three and nine months were used. RESULTS: Patients with recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy who received an ICD had better survival than those treated with standard therapy at both cut points. This difference in survival was significant at three months (p < 0.05) and was borderline significant at nine months (p = 0.058). Patients with remotely diagnosed cardiomyopathy did not have a significant survival benefit with ICD insertion, but there were no significant differences between ICD benefit in the recent and remote diagnosis groups (p = 0.17 and 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have a recent cardiomyopathy diagnosis do not have any less ICD benefit than those with a remote diagnosis. Thus, ICD therapy should be considered in such patients as soon as they are identified as long as a reversible cause of left ventricular dysfunction is excluded.

Effects of statin therapy on arrhythmic events and survival in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether statins were associated with a survival benefit and significant attenuation in life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Statins are associated with a reduction in appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and improved clinical status in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: The effect of statin use on time to death or resuscitated cardiac arrest and time to arrhythmic sudden death was evaluated in 458 patients enrolled in the DEFINITE (DEFIbrillators in Non-Ischemic cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation) study. The effect of statin use on time to first appropriate shock was analyzed only in the 229 patients who were randomized to ICD therapy. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death among patients on versus those not on statin therapy was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.55; p = 0.001). When controlled for statin effects, ICD therapy was associated with improved survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04). There was one arrhythmic sudden death in the 110 patients receiving statin therapy (0.9%) versus 18 of 348 patients not receiving statins (5.2%; p = 0.04). The unadjusted HR for arrhythmic sudden death among patients on versus those not on statin therapy was 0.16 (95% CI 0.022 to 1.21; p = 0.08). The HR for appropriate shocks among patients on versus those not on statin therapy was 0.78 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.82) after adjustment for baseline differences in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use in the DEFINITE study was associated with a 78% reduction in mortality. This reduction was caused, in part, by a reduction in arrhythmic sudden death. These findings should be confirmed in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

DEFibrillators In Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE).

The DEFibrillators In Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) was a multi-center, randomized, investigator-initiated trial. Patients enrolled in the trial had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 10 PVCs/hr or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia defined as 3 to 15 beats at a rate of >120 bpm) on Holter monitor or telemetry within the past 6 months. All patients received standard oral medical therapy for heart failure including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. Patients were randomized to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) versus no ICD. Patients were followed for 2 to 3 years. The primary endpoint was total mortality. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics analysis was also performed. A registry tracked patients who met basic inclusion criteria but were not randomized. We estimated an annual total mortality of 15% at 2 years in the treatment arm that did not receive an ICD. The ICD was expected to reduce mortality by 50%. Approximately 229 patients were required in each treatment group. Forty-five centers were included in this trial that was designed to last an estimated 4 years. Enrollment was projected to occur over 2 1/2 years with a post enrollment follow-up of 1 1/2 years.

Accuracy of mode switch algorithms for detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with permanent pacemakers, mode switching events often are interpreted as surrogate markers for atrial tachyarrhythmias. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of automatic mode switching algorithms in patients with permanent pacemakers for the diagnosis of atrial tachyarrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and Medtronic Thera or Kappa 700 permanent pacemakers underwent Holter monitoring. Date, time of onset, and duration of each mode switch episode as recorded by the pacemaker and each atrial tachyarrhythmia episode as recorded by the Holter monitor were compared. Sixteen patients had a total of 54 atrial tachyarrhythmias documented on Holter monitoring (47 atrial fibrillation, 7 atrial flutter). Comparison of Holter data with pacemaker interrogation demonstrated that 53 (98.1%) of 54 atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes resulted in mode switching with one 13-second episode of mode switching during sinus rhythm. The sensitivity and specificity of mode switching for the duration of atrial tachyarrhythmias were 98.1% and 100%, respectively. The algorithms detected 98.9% of the total duration of atrial fibrillation and 96.4% of the total duration of atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: In patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and permanent pacemakers having these mode switching algorithms, mode switching events are reliable surrogate markers for atrial tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, mode switching may serve as a valuable tool for clinical decision making and further research into the natural history and burden of atrial tachyarrhythmias.