A method comparison study of the high throughput automated HISCL® SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay using nasopharyngeal swab samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects against conventional RT-PCR.

Our study aim was to evaluate the performance of the automated Sysmex HISCL® severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen assay against reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We tested 277 remnant frozen nasopharyngeal swab samples, stored in universal transport medium (UTM), yielding a sensitivity of 94.9% against historical RT-PCR results with cycle threshold (Ct ) < 30, and a sensitivity of 76.7% for Ct < 35, and specificity of 100% (all Ct values) confirming compatibility of UTM-diluted samples with the assay system. Thereafter, we prospectively collected 141 nasopharyngeal swab samples in UTM from healthcare workers and 1369 paired swabs (400 UTM; 969 dry) from individuals at a public health testing center, with the first swab (UTM) reserved for RT-PCR, yielding a positivity rate of 4.6%. HISCL assay performance using UTM swabs was superior to dry swabs, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.5%-100%) at Ct < 30 versus 92.3% (95%CI 81.5%-97.9%), and a specificity of 99.3% (95% CI 98.1-99.89) against 83.3% (95%CI 80.7%-85.6%). We conclude that this antigen assay is suitable for high throughput facilities where the primary indication for testing is to rule out infection with low RT-PCR Ct values (proxy for high viral loads) to curb viral spread.

The diagnostic accuracy of the GeneXpert ESBL-ampC prototype assay for rapid PCR-based detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes directly from urine.

IMPORTANCE: Early identification of complicated urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales has the potential to limit the use of carbapenems to those patients without alternative antibiotic options and avoid the empirical use of carbapenems in patients without ESBL-producing bacteria. The purpose for such a test will differ by setting and ESBL prevalence rates. Countries with low ESBL rates and cephalosporins as empiric treatment (e.g., The Netherlands) will need a rule-in test to decide to use carbapenems, while countries with high ESBL rates and empiric carbapenem treatment will need a rule-out test for ESBLs to de-escalate therapy early. Anyway, such as a test would-at least theoretically-improve patient care and reduce selective pressure for the emergence of carbapenem resistance.