Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Chest ; 98(6): 1455-62, 1990 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2123151

RESUMO

To determine the magnitude, duration, and associated factors of perioperative changes in pulmonary function, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 145 patients who required preoperative mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure before undergoing 200 surgical procedures. Patients were grouped into five pulmonary diagnostic categories: (1) adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (n = 49); (2) pneumonia (n = 20); (3) atelectasis (n = 65); (4) congestive heart failure (n = 11); and (5) acute ventilatory failure (n = 55). Sixty patients underwent intra-abdominal surgery, 135 patients required surgery on the periphery, and five patients had a thoracotomy. For all patients, PaO2/FIO2 declined significantly from 321 mm Hg (mean) preoperatively to 258 mm Hg intraoperatively, and shunt fraction (Qs/QT) increased from 0.16 to 0.23 without a significant change in PaCO2. The magnitude of the increase in Qs/QT did not differ among pulmonary diagnostic groups. Preoperatively, patients undergoing laparotomy had lower PaO2/FIO2 (278 vs 340) and higher Qs/QT (0.19 vs 0.14) than patients requiring surgery on the periphery. Intraoperatively, Qs/QT increased more during abdominal procedures than during peripheral procedures. Intraoperative hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2 less than 80 mm Hg) occurred during 13 procedures. Hypoxemic patients had a mean increase in Qs/QT of 0.20 (0.25 preoperatively to 0.45 intraoperatively), and a significant increase in PaCO2 from 38 mm Hg to 45 mm Hg intraoperatively). In general, these patients had ARDS (n = 10), sepsis (n = 10), a laparotomy (n = 9), and intraoperative mechanical ventilation via the Ohio Anesthesia ventilator (n = 8), a commonly used operating room ventilator. Their preoperative peak airway pressure (54 cm H2O) and minute ventilation (20 L/min) requirements exceeded the capabilities of the Ohio Anesthesia ventilator and likely contributed to impaired gas exchange intraoperatively. Within the first several hours postoperatively, PaO2/FIO2 recovered to preoperative levels in all patients, even in those who had severe intraoperative hypoxemia develop and who underwent laparotomy. We conclude that most patients with acute respiratory failure receiving preoperative mechanical ventilation experienced mild-to-moderate deterioration in intraoperative pulmonary oxygen exchange that rapidly returned to preoperative levels after surgery. We recommend that necessary surgery not be postponed by concern that pulmonary function will be worsened by surgery and anesthesia.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Mecânica Respiratória , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Doença Aguda , Anestesia Geral , Dióxido de Carbono/sangue , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Oxigênio/sangue , Pneumonia/complicações , Atelectasia Pulmonar/complicações , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/complicações , Insuficiência Respiratória/sangue , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Occup Med ; 35(11): 1138-41, 1993 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8295039

RESUMO

The level of N2O contamination in the breathing zone of anesthesiologists was measured while they administered inhalation anesthesia by mask to five patients. A mask gas-scavenging attachment was used for 30 minutes and then removed while anesthesia continued for a further 30 minutes. The levels of N2O with and without the scavenging attachment were compared. Using the scavenging attachment, N2O contamination was reduced from greater than 150 ppm to less than 5 ppm, a level well below the 25 ppm limit recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The scavenging device is a simple and effective way to reduce operating room contamination with N2O during delivery of anesthesia by mask.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Anestesia por Inalação/instrumentação , Depuradores de Gases , Dióxido de Nitrogênio , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Salas Cirúrgicas , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/efeitos adversos , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise
3.
Crit Care Med ; 22(2): 326-33, 1994 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8306693

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and ventilatory characteristics of a new mode of ventilation (pressurized injection/suction ventilation). DESIGN: Descriptive and analytical laboratory study. SETTING: Laboratory study. SUBJECTS: Simulated lung model and dogs. INTERVENTIONS: We tested the ability to maintain ventilation through a 2.5-mm internal diameter ventilating stylet in the setting of simulated complete airway occlusion. A microprocessor-controlled ventilator mode was used wherein injection of oxygen under high pressure (flow rate 95 L/min) alternates with suction of expired gas (flow rate 18 L/min) through the ventilating stylet. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In a lung model, we achieved a maximum minute ventilation of 12.9 L/min. In two dogs, we maintained stable oxygenation (mean PaO2 603 +/- 47 torr [80.4 +/- 6.3 kPa]) and ventilation (mean PaCO2 19 +/- 3 torr [2.5 +/- 0.4 kPa]) for 15 mins at maximum minute ventilation settings. No clinically important deleterious effects on the tracheal mucosa were observed. The ventilator system's safety-abort feature prevented overinflation or excessive deflation of the dogs' lungs in every test of simulated malfunction of the pressure-monitoring mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Pressurized injection/suction ventilation can maintain adequate gas exchange in an animal model with near-complete airway obstruction. Further work is needed to develop the safety and clinical applications of pressurized injection/suction ventilation in the management of patients with near-complete airway occlusion.


Assuntos
Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/terapia , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Animais , Cães , Pulmão/fisiologia , Modelos Estruturais , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar
4.
Anesthesiology ; 71(3): 396-402, 1989 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2774267

RESUMO

Whether maintaining pulmonary nitrogenation and/or a stable ventilatory pattern during surgery would minimize changes in perioperative pulmonary function in two groups of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) whose lungs were being mechanically ventilated was examined. Group 1 (n = 39 cases) (inspired oxygen fraction [FIO2] less than or equal to 0.5, minute ventilation less than or equal to 15 l/min, peak inspiratory pressure less than or equal to 50 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] less than or equal to 10 cmH2O) were assigned randomly to one of four intraoperative ventilator-gas mixture (FIO2 approximately 0.5) combinations: 1) Siemens 900C ventilator, N2/O2; 2) Siemens 900C ventilator, N2O/O2; 3) Ohio anesthesia ventilator, N2/O2; or 4) Ohio anesthesia ventilator, N2O/O2. Group 2 (n = 15 cases) (ventilatory requirements exceeding any of those in Group 1) had their lungs ventilated intraoperatively with the Siemens 900C ventilator and a gas mixture determined by their anesthesiologist (FIO2 approximately 0.6-1.0). In patients whose lungs were ventilated with the Ohio N2O/O2 combination, PaO2/FIO2 decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) from 358 +/- 93 mmHg (mean +/- SD) preoperatively to 282 +/- 77 mmHg intraoperatively. The level of PEEP increased significantly from 5 +/- 3 cmH2O preoperatively to 9 +/- 4 cmH2O intraoperatively (P less than 0.05). In patients whose lungs were ventilated with the Ohio N2/O2 combination, PaO2/FIO2 decreased significantly from 270 +/- 86 mmHg preoperatively to 174 +/- 74 mmHg intraoperatively. These variables did not change significantly in patients ventilated with the Siemens ventilator (groups 1 and 2). Pulmonary oxygen gas exchange returned to preoperative values by the first hour postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Insuficiência Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Ventiladores Mecânicos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar , Radiografia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Insuficiência Respiratória/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Relação Ventilação-Perfusão
5.
Anesthesiology ; 71(3): 403-8, 1989 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2672901

RESUMO

The effect of increasing airway pressure on the mean inspiratory flow and maximum minute ventilation (VE) capabilities of five anesthesia ventilators (Ohio Anesthesia, Airshields Ventimeter, Ohmeda 7000, Draeger AV-E and Siemens 900D) was compared to identify mechanical factor(s) limiting intraoperative ventilation of the lungs of patients with acute respiratory failure. The effect of increasing airway pressure on mean inspiratory flow was determined by cycling each ventilator through increasing restrictors. Maximum VE was measured under three study conditions using a test lung: 1) low compliance (10-30 ml/cmH2O) and minimal airflow resistance; 2) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 0, 10, and 20 cmH2O at a compliance of 20 ml/cmH2O with minimal airflow resistance; and 3) increased resistance (19 +/- 11 cmH2O.1(-1).s-1) and compliance of 30 ml/cmH2O. As airway pressure increased from 0 to 80 cmH2O, mean inspiratory flow decreased markedly for all ventilators except the Siemens. The Siemens ventilator delivered the greatest VE under all three conditions and maintained VE when airway pressure increased due to decreased compliance or the application of PEEP; all other ventilators markedly decreased VE under these conditions. The addition of airway resistance reduced maximal VE for all ventilators by limiting the maximal inspiratory duty cycle (T1/TTOT). Thus, mean inspiratory flow of conventional anesthesia ventilators decreases with increasing airway pressure. The decreased inspiratory flow limits maximum VE when airway pressure is elevated because of decreased lung-thorax compliance and/or increased airway resistance, such as that characterizing patients with acute respiratory failure. Significant airway resistance further limits maximum VE by limiting the maximal T1/TTOT that can be used without increasing end-expiratory lung pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Anestesiologia/instrumentação , Ventiladores Mecânicos , Resistência das Vias Respiratórias , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Complacência Pulmonar , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Pressão , Ventilação Pulmonar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa