RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a common skin disease with a negative impact on patients' quality of life in occupational and non-occupational settings. Up-to-date, data on HE in Italian patients referred for patch testing are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To characterise the profile in terms of demographics, aetiology and patch test results of Italian patients affected by HE referred for patch testing. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study on consecutive patients affected by HE who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2023 in eight dermatology clinics was performed. HE patients were divided into two groups according to the exclusive (HE-only group) and not-exclusive (HE+ group) hand involvement, and compared to patients with eczema localised in body areas other than hands (NHE group). RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and ninety-seven patients were affected by HE (35.3% males; mean age 42.7 years), 60.2% belonging to the HE-only group and 39.8% to the HE+ group. Occupational dermatitis was diagnosed in 33.2% of HE-only patients, 25.0% of HE+ patients and 5.2% of NHE patients (p < 0.001). HE-only patients presented: Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD), Irritant Contact Dermatitis (ICD), atopic HE in 48.1%, 47.5% and 7.1%, respectively; hyperkeratotic palmar, acute recurrent vesicular and nummular clinical subtypes in 52.2%, 43.9% and 11.9%, respectively; relevant positive patch test reactions in 48.1% (nickel sulphate 18.9%, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 10.6%, methylisothiazolinone 8.6%, p-phenylenediamine 6.0% and potassium dichromate 4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: HE patients, and particularly those with exclusive hand involvement, show a particular profile in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, etiologies and relevant positive patch test reactions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent reason of dermatological consultation. Its aetiology is not univocal, being contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, the most frequent. The primary sources of allergen exposure include cosmetics, metals, and topical medications, from direct, indirect, or airborne contact. OBJECTIVES: To define the frequency of positive patch test reactions to SIDAPA baseline series allergens, to document positive allergens, and to precise the final diagnosis in patients with eyelid involvement. METHODS: A total of 8557 consecutive patients from 12 Italian Dermatology Clinics underwent patch testing with SIDAPA baseline series in 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) with eyelid involvement with or without other involved sites (E-Group) and (ii) without eyelid involvement (NE-Group). The final diagnosis and the frequency of positive relevant patch test reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: E-Group consisted of 688 patients (females 78.6%, mean age 45.3 years), 8.0% of 8557 consecutively patch-tested patients. The final diagnosis in E-Group was ADC in 42.4%, ICD in 34.2%, and AD in 30.5%. The highest reaction rates were elicited by nickel sulphate and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in both E-Group and NE-Group, even if these allergens were significantly more frequently positive in NE-Group patients than in E-Group ones. Positive patch test reactions to fragrance Mix II, dimethylaminopropylamine, and sorbitan sesquiolate were significantly more frequent in E-Group patients than in NE-Group ones. CONCLUSIONS: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent dermatological complaint. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent diagnosis commonly caused by nickel sulphate, isothiazolinones, and fragrances. The surfactants dimethylaminopropylamine and sorbitan sesquioleate are emerging causes of eyelid allergic contact dermatitis.
Assuntos
Blefarite , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Níquel , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Pálpebras , Itália/epidemiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , AdultoRESUMO
A 98-year-old woman presented with histologically confirmed locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face. A multidisciplinary approach excluded surgery because of the site near sensitive organs, extension, age, and comorbidities. Patient and caregivers declined radiotherapy considering the necessity of multiple hospital appointments. The patient was then placed on therapy with sonidegib, an oral inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. There was a very rapid clinical response after only 28 days of treatment. The basal cell carcinoma improved progressively, with no adverse events reported. This case illustrates the efficacy and safety of this treatment in an advanced age patient. This treatment had a remarkably positive impact on quality of life, including that of the caregivers.
Assuntos
Compostos de Bifenilo , Carcinoma Basocelular , Piridinas , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Feminino , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Bifenilo/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Faciais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Faciais/patologia , Proteínas Hedgehog/antagonistas & inibidores , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC), contained in fragrance mix II (FM II), has been recognized as a contact sensitizer since the mid-1990s. After several attempts to reduce its use during the last two decades, HICC was permanently banned from the European market in August 2021. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and the time trend of contact allergy to HICC and to investigate the concordance of HICC allergy compared to FM II allergy in an unselected Italian patch test population. METHODS/PATIENTS: Retrospective analysis on demographics and patch test results of HICC-sensitized and/or FM II-sensitized patients was performed over a 6-year period (2016-2021) at 6 patch test Clinics in Italy. RESULTS: Among 7266 patients (4942 females, 68.0%, mean age 45.4 ± 20.6 years), 1% (70) resulted positive to HICC and 2.1% (153) to FM II. Clinical relevance was documented in 72.9% (51/70) of HICC positive patients. Among the 169 HICC and/or FM II positive patients, 9.5% had a positive reaction to HICC only, 31.9% to both HICC and FM II, and 58.6% to FM II only. The prevalence trend line of HICC positive reactions showed a decrease from 1.15% (2016) to 0.96% (2021). CONCLUSIONS: We documented a decreasing trend of HICC allergy in Italy, in line with the data recently reported in literature. Nevertheless, HICC should be maintained in the baseline series to monitor the benefits of its ban from the European market.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Perfumes , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Odorantes , Perfumes/efeitos adversos , Itália/epidemiologia , Testes do Emplastro/métodosRESUMO
A 76-year-old man came to our attention for the presence of itchy skin lesions localized on the trunk. The patient had a nodular melanoma removed two years earlier. Because of metastatic pulmonary melanoma, he underwent a lung lobectomy and began adjuvant therapy with nivolumab. After six months of treatment, the patient reported the appearance of itchy lesions on the trunk that were diagnosed as eczema and successfully treated with systemic corticosteroids. Upon corticosteroid discontinuation, the eruption relapsed presenting with erythematous macules, tense blisters, and erosions on the trunk and limbs. The presence of linear deposits of IgG and C3 at the dermo-epidermal junction and high serum levels of anti-BP180 antibodies confirmed the suspicion of nivolumab-induced bullous pemphigoid. Treatment with 0.6mg/kg methylprednisolone and 200mg/day doxycycline as well as nivolumab discontinuation induced temporary remission. After tapering methylprednisolone to 16mg/day, the patient developed new blisters. Therefore, dupilumab 300mg every other week was added with progressive improvement while methylprednisolone was tapered down and withdrawn after four months. After six months the patient was still in full clinical remission. Many cases of conventional bullous pemphigoid have been treated successfully with dupilumab, which can also be used safely in cancer patients without inducing overt immunosuppression.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Vesícula/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/complicações , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Penfigoide Bolhoso/induzido quimicamente , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Penfigoide Bolhoso/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Pseudo-Pelger-Huët anomaly is a condition in which almost all the granulocytes are hyposegmented and/or hypogranulated. It is typically recognized in peripheral blood smears and represents a marker of several disorders, such as myeloproliferative diseases and myelodysplasia. The occurrence of the pseudo-Pelger-Huët anomaly in the cutaneous infiltrate of pyoderma gangrenosum is very rare. We describe the case of a 70-year-old man with idiopathic myelofibrosis who developed pyoderma gangrenosum. Histological examination showed an infiltrate consisting of granulocytic elements with features of dysmaturity and segmentation anomalies (hypo- and hypersegmented forms), suggestive of pseudo-Pelger-Huët anomaly. Methylprednisolone treatment resulted in progressive improvement of pyoderma gangrenosum.
Assuntos
Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Anomalia de Pelger-Huët , Mielofibrose Primária , Pioderma Gangrenoso , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Anomalia de Pelger-Huët/complicações , Anomalia de Pelger-Huët/patologia , Mielofibrose Primária/complicações , Mielofibrose Primária/patologia , Pioderma Gangrenoso/patologia , Granulócitos/patologia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/complicaçõesRESUMO
Alitretinoin is the only systemic agent approved to treat moderate-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. No nationwide Italian data regarding real-life efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment are available. The DECISA project (DErmatology Clinics in Italy: Survey on Alitretinoin) retrospectively examined data from a registry including 15 Dermatology Clinics authorized to prescription of alitretinoin for CHE patients. Disease severity was assessed at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment, using the 5-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and the modified Total Lesion-Symptoms-Severity (mTLSS) scores. Between November 2010 and July 2018, data of 248 male and 190 female patients (mean age 49.71 ± 13.20 years) treated with alitretinoin were collected. Of them, 43.2% had irritant contact dermatitis, 22.2% allergic contact dermatitis, 18.0% atopic dermatitis, 16.7% mixed (irritant/allergic) type of eczema. At 3 months, the 420 re-evaluated patients showed significantly reduced mTLSS and PGA (P < .0000001 vs baseline for both); PGA was clear/almost clear in 35.6% of cases. At 6 months, the 341 re-evaluated patients showed significant (P < .0000001) improvement of mTLSS and PGA vs baseline and 3 months (PGA clear/almost clear: 41.4%). Relapses occurred in 125 patients; 58 underwent an additional course of alitretinoin, with similarly good results. No relevant safety issues were reported; 86 patients experienced adverse effects, which forced 40 to prematurely stop treatment. The DECISA project results confirm the real-life efficacy, safety and tolerability of alitretinoin in the treatment of moderate to severe CHE refractory to standard topical therapies.
Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Dermatologia , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Adulto , Alitretinoína , Doença Crônica , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tretinoína/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune disease that typically presents with blisters, but sometimes early lesions may be eczematous, maculopapular, or urticarial. The aim of the present study was to highlight possible differences between typical bullous and non-bullous pemphigoid (NBP) and compare results with the literature. Material & methods: Patients receiving a diagnosis of BP between January 2000 and December 2019 were analyzed. Patients who developed a blister after 3 months from the onset of pruritus were considered as NBP. Demographic features, clinical findings at diagnosis and at 2-year follow-up, histological features, auto-antibodies titers, comorbidities and their treatment were retrieved. Categorical variables were evaluated for normal distribution using a histogram and a Q-Q plot. The χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables between the groups. Continuous variables were compared between the groups using analysis of variance and the independent-samples t test. For multivariate analysis, logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients received a diagnosis of BP. A total of 122 patients were enrolled in the study; 63 were females, and the mean age at the diagnosis was 77.2 years (±11.9 SD). 98 were affected by BP and 24 were categorized as NBP. Mean time to diagnosis was 2.9 months (±5.8 SD) for BP and 30.4 months (±59.8 SD) for NBP (p = 0.0001). Skin manifestations in NBP patients were, in order of frequency: urticarial, papular or nodular, eczematous, and excoriations. Pruritus intensity was high but similar in the two groups (Numerical Rating Scale - NRS, 9.3 vs. 8.9). Seven out of 24 NBP patients (29%) never developed blisters; the other patients developed blisters after a mean follow-up time of 24.9 months (±54.9 SD). NBP patients had a more frequent history of myocardial infarction than BP patients (37.5 vs. 10.2%; p < 0.003). More NBP patients were taking diuretics than BP patients (66.7 vs. 49%; p = 0.03). NBP patients had a worse response to pruritus compared to BP patients at 2 years (NRS 3.7 vs. 11; p 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NBP patients have a delayed diagnosis and may be at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, especially myocardial infarction. Severely and persistently itchy skin disorders in aged patients should be investigated for BP diagnosis.
Assuntos
Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penfigoide Bolhoso/complicações , Penfigoide Bolhoso/terapia , Prurido/etiologia , Prurido/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Avaliação de SintomasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Because Myroxylon pereirae (MP), or balsam of Peru, is nowadays almost not used "as such," and fragrance mix 1 (FM1) apparently is more sensitive in detecting fragrance allergy, the usefulness of testing MP in baseline series was recently questioned. OBJECTIVES: Identification of the number of clinically relevant patch test reactions to MP not detected by FM1. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 12 030 patients patch tested with MP and FM1 for contact dermatitis between January 2018 and December 2019 in 13 Italian dermatology clinics. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-nine patients (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to MP; 437 (3.6%) had a positive patch test reaction to FM1. Positive reactions to both MP and FM1 were observed in 119 subjects (1.0%), 310 (2.6%) reacted to MP only, 304 (2.5%) to FM1 only, 5 to MP and sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO), 9 to FM1 and SSO, and 5 to MP, FM1, and SSO. Single sensitizations were clinically relevant in 75.2% of cases for MP (62.9% current, 12.3% past) and 76.3% for FM1 (70.1% current, 6.2% past). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, MP appears to be still worth testing along with FM1 in baseline series, because it allows detection of a remarkable number of fragrance allergies, often relevant, which would be otherwise missed.
Assuntos
Bálsamos/administração & dosagem , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bálsamos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Hexoses/administração & dosagem , Hexoses/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Odorantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Budesonide was included in the European Baseline Series in 2000 as the most suitable marker forcorticosteroid hypersensitivity. In the last two decades, a decreasing trend of budesonide allergy has been observed. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to budesonide in a large, Italian patch test population, characterizing patients according to MOAHLFA index and evaluating the benefit with extended readings of budesonide patch test. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient demographics and patch test results over a 2-year period (2018-2019) was performed at 14 patch test clinics in Italy. RESULTS: Ninety out of 14 544 (0.6%) patients reacted to budesonide 0.01% pet.. Positive reactions were mild in 54.4% and late readings at day 7 showed new positive reactions in 37.8% of patients. The MOAHLFA index showed a significant positive association with male gender, atopic dermatitis, and age >40 years and a significant negative association with hand and face dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: We documented a low prevalence of budesonide allergy in Italy, confirming its decreasing trend recently reported in the literature. Nevertheless, budesonide needs to be maintained in the baseline series for its good ability to detect corticosteroid sensitization.
Assuntos
Budesonida/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Budesonida/imunologia , Reações Cruzadas , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por SexoRESUMO
We report an 11-year-old girl who presented with white papules on the dorsal and palmar region of the hands bilaterally. The parents reported that the lesions had appeared four months before and some had resolved spontaneously. The girl was suffering from celiac disease, Down syndrome, and alopecia areata treated with topical corticosteroids. At the first visit, the girl presented with alopecia areata, corticosteroid acne, and a dozen white papules located on the hands. On dermoscopy, a whitish structureless area was seen. Histological examination showed the presence of calcium deposits without tissue damage, thus confirming the diagnosis of milia-like idiopathic calcinosis cutis. At 6-month follow up, the lesions had completely disappeared. Milia-like idiopathic calcinosis cutis is a benign cutaneous disorder consisting of calcium deposits in an apparently undamaged dermis and is typically associated with Down syndrome. Up to a quarter of patients have coexisting syringomas. The milia-like papules tend to self-resolve as patients reach adulthood, so a wait-and-see approach is recommended.
Assuntos
Calcinose/complicações , Síndrome de Down/complicações , Dermatoses da Mão/complicações , Pele/patologia , Alopecia em Áreas/complicações , Calcinose/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/patologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Dermatopatias/complicaçõesRESUMO
Dupilumab and cyclosporin are recommended treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). The objective of this study was to investigate drug survival of dupilumab in comparison with CsA, reasons of drug discontinuation, and predictive parameters of drug survival in daily practice. Retrospective study including patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab or cyclosporin (CsA) from January 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020. Drug survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and predictive factors were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analyses. Adult patients with AD (n = 251) treated with dupilumab (n = 149) or CsA (n = 102) were included. Sixteen months from baseline, 82% of patients receiving dupilumab were still on treatment vs 11% of those treated with CsA. Reason for withdrawing dupilumab were primary inefficacy in 4.7% of patients, persistent clinical remission in 7.4%, and cutaneous adverse effects in 2.0%. Older age at diagnosis and shorter AD duration predicted shorter dupilumab survival. Reasons for CsA withdrawal included adverse effects in 23.5% of patients, persistent clinical remission in 15.6%, and a minimal or absent improvement in 11.7%. Dupilumab has a longer drug survival compared to CsA. Only a limited number of dupilumab patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects and/or ineffectiveness.