Dosing Characteristics of Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin-Derived LH Activity in Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation: A German Fertility Database Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate dosing of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG)-derived medications with LH activity in ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: A non-interventional study was performed to analyse data from the German RecDate database (January 2007-December 2011). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Starting/total r-hLH/hMG dose, OS duration/cycle number, r-hLH/hMG initiation day (first day of administration), and population/cycle characteristics were assessed in women (≥18 years) undergoing OS for IVF/ICSI using r-hLH or hMG-derived medications (excluding corifollitropin alfa, clomiphene citrate, letrozole, mini/micro-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin, and urofollitropin alone). Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: 67,858 identified cycles utilized medications containing r-hLH (10,749), hMG (56,432), or both (677). Mean (standard deviation) OS duration with r-hLH and hMG was 10.1 (4.43) and 9.8 (6.16) days, respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile) r-hLH starting dose (75.0 [75.0-150.0] IU) was consistent across patients regardless of age, infertility diagnosis, or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) protocol. Median (25th-75th percentile) hMG-derived LH activity starting dose was 225.0 (150.0-300.0) IU, regardless of GnRH protocol, but was lower in women aged <35 years and those with ovulation disorders/polycystic ovary syndrome. Median (25th-75th percentile) total dose for r-hLH (750.0 [337.5-1,125.0] IU) and hMG-derived LH activity (1,575.0 [750.0-2,625.0] IU) varied according to patients' age, infertility diagnosis, cycle number, and r-hLH/hMG initiation day. GnRH antagonist use resulted in a numerically higher median total hMG-derived LH activity dose than GnRH agonist use. LIMITATIONS: The data used in this study were taken from electronic medical records relating to a specific timeframe (2007-2011) and therefore may not accurately reflect current clinical practice; however, it is likely that the differences between the two compounds would be maintained. Additionally, secondary data sources may suffer from uniformity and quality issues. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of care for OS cycles is described with respect to IVF/ICSI treatment including an LH component in Germany during the specified timeframe.

Predicting live birth for poor ovarian responders: the PROsPeR concept.

RESEARCH QUESTION: A number of live-birth predictive models are available, and despite clinical interest these are rarely used owing to poor performance. In addition, no predictive models specifically for poor ovarian responders (POR) are available. The aim of the current project was to develop a clinically applicable tool for predicting live birth for PORs receiving recombinant human FSH [r-hFSH]. DESIGN: A model was developed to predict live birth in PORs receiving r-hFSH, using data from the ESPART trial. Initially, two models were developed separately: one for patients with data from a previous assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and one for ART treatment-naïve patients. Subsequently, the simplified Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) concept was derived. RESULTS: PROsPeR considers three predictors and categorizes PORs into three scores, with predicted the live-birth rate divided by three with each worsening category. When adequately calibrated, a discrimination score up to area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) (95% CI) of 0.84 (0.79 to 0.88) was observed, which is superior to previously published models. Lower discriminations were observed when the PROsPeR model was used to evaluate the patients who received both r-hFSH and recombinant human LH in the ESPART study (AUCROC [95% CI] 0.66 [0.61 to 0.71]) and when all the patients included in the ESPART study were evaluated (AUCROC [95% CI] 0.68 [0.61 to 0.72]). CONCLUSIONS: This model, specific to PORs receiving r-hFSH, constitutes the best compromise between precision and simplicity, and is suitable for routine practice.

Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of adding recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) during ovarian stimulation is a subject of debate, although there is evidence that it may benefit certain subpopulations, e.g. poor responders. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL) were searched (from 1990 to 2011). Prospective, parallel-, comparative-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in women aged 18-45 years undergoing in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection or both, treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and r-hFSH plus r-hLH or r-hFSH alone were included. The co-primary endpoints were number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate. Analyses were conducted for the overall population and for prospectively identified patient subgroups, including patients with poor ovarian response (POR). RESULTS: In total, 40 RCTs (6443 patients) were included in the analysis. Data on the number of oocytes retrieved were reported in 41 studies and imputed in two studies. Therefore, data were available from 43 studies (r-hFSH plus r-hLH, n=3113; r-hFSH, n=3228) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all randomly allocated patients, including imputed data). Overall, no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved was found between the r-hFSH plus r-hLH and r-hFSH groups (weighted mean difference -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.41 to 0.34). However, in poor responders, significantly more oocytes were retrieved with r-hFSH plus r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone (n=1077; weighted mean difference +0.75 oocytes; 95% CI 0.14-1.36). Significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates were observed with r-hFSH plus r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone in the overall population analysed in this review (risk ratio [RR] 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.18) and in poor responders (n=1179; RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.01-1.67; ITT population); the observed difference was more pronounced in poor responders. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there is a relative increase in the clinical pregnancy rates of 9% in the overall population and 30% in poor responders. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the addition of r-hLH to r-hFSH may be beneficial for women with POR.

Midluteal serum progesterone levels and pregnancy following ovulation induction with human follicle-stimulating hormone: results of a combined-data analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis of combined data (one Phase II and three Phase III clinical trials) of patients with oligo- or anovulatory infertility aimed to evaluate the association between pregnancy and midluteal serum progesterone (P4) level following ovulation induction and hence the indicative value of P4 for ovulation and pregnancy achievement. STUDY DESIGN: All patients (n = 913) were treated with human follicle-stimulating hormone. Cycles (n = 1,554) with one or two serum P4 levels in the luteal phase (days 5-12) following human chorionic gonadotropin administration and complete data on cycle outcome were included. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy was achieved in 295/1,554 (19.0%) cycles; 87.5% of these led to live births (16.6%/cycle). Including and excluding multiple pregnancy data, 88% and 86% of all live births had P4 values >10 ng/mL, respectively. Overall clinical pregnancy rate plateaued at midluteal P4 levels >25 ng/mL but, when multiple pregnancies were excluded, plateaued at 20-25 ng/mL and then decreased. Mean midluteal P4 levels were twice as high in multiple versus singleton pregnancies. CONCLUSION: A midluteal P4 level >10 ng/mL may represent an appropriate threshold for indication of ovulation resulting in live birth. Multiple pregnancies were associated with higher mean midluteal P4 levels.

Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Human menopausal gonadotrophins and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone are the two main gonadotrophin products utilized for controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies. In this meta-analysis, the number of oocytes was designated as the most relevant endpoint directly resulting from ovarian stimulation, and therefore where the drug effect may be estimated with the best sensitivity. METHODS: All published randomized controlled trials on ovarian stimulation comparing the two gonadotrophin products were evaluated. Internal validity was determined using Chalmers' validated scale. If trials did not meet the established quality criteria, a sensitivity analysis assessed the stability of the results. The comparison of continuous variables was conducted following the weighted mean difference and the standardized mean difference (Cohen's effect size) with the random model. Given the known relationship of baseline conditions on treatment endpoints, results were adjusted for age, body mass index and type of infertility. RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 4040 patients were included. Treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins resulted in fewer oocytes (-1.54; 95% CI: -2.53 to -0.56; P < 0.0001) compared to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. When adjusting for baseline conditions, the mean difference estimate was -2.10 (95% CI: -2.83 to -1.36; P < 0.001). A higher total dose of human menopausal gonadotrophin was necessary (mean difference, 235.46 IU [95% CI: 16.62 to 454.30; P = 0.03]; standardized mean difference, 0.33 [95% CI: 0.08 to 0.58; P = 0.01]). The pregnancy absolute risk difference (RD [hMG-r-hFSH]) for fresh transfers was 3% (P = 0.051), and the relative risk 1.10 (P = 0.06). When adjusted for baseline conditions, the relative risk was 1.04 (P = 0.49) and absolute difference was 0.01 (P = 0.34), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because baseline conditions are predictive of outcome, meta-analytic results are more sensitive when these variables are considered. Using an endpoint closely associated with the stimulation period, sufficient sensitivity is achieved to compare gonadotrophin treatments. As the largest meta-analysis published to date on this subject, treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins is characterized by fewer oocytes and a higher total dose. When considering only fresh transfers, pregnancy rates were similar.

The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, observational oocyte cryopreservation registry.

BACKGROUND: It has been recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine that options to preserve fertility be presented at the outset of treatment for cancer. This recommendation may have arisen, in part, to the increasing survival of patients with cancer and the realization that certain forms of cancer treatment can lead to infertility. One option for these patients, particularly those with ethical or religious objections to freezing embryos is oocyte cryopreservation. However universal acceptance of these procedures has yet to be established, most likely due to a poor history of success and concerns that there has yet to be a comprehensive approach to evaluating these techniques. In light of this, a registry of patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation, called the HOPE registry, is being implemented. DISCUSSION: The intent of the HOPE Registry is to enroll approximately 400 women of reproductive age who will undergo thawing/warming of oocytes and subsequent transfer. Data from the patients enrolled will be collected via a uniform, standardized form and will document important parameters such as demographics, laboratory procedures and outcomes, including following the outcomes of babies born for one year after birth. The results of the registry will be published on a yearly basis. SUMMARY: A patient registry has been established in order to systematically document the techniques and outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation procedures. The results will be published in order to provide a widely accessible resource that will allow patients who are considering these procedures validated information in order to make informed decisions as to how their treatment will proceed.

A comparison of menotropin, highly-purified menotropin and follitropin alfa in cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

BACKGROUND: Over the last several decades, as a result of an evolution in manufacturing processes, a marked development has been made in the field of gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation. Initially, therapeutic gonadotropins were produced from a simple process of urine extraction and purification; now they are produced via a complex system involving recombinant technology, which yields gonadotropins with high levels of purity, quality, and consistency. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 865 consecutive intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) compared the clinical efficacy of three gonadotropins (menotropin [hMG; n = 299], highly-purified hMG [HP-hMG; n = 330] and follitropin alfa [r-hFSH; n = 236]) for ovarian stimulation after pituitary down-regulation. The endpoints were live birth rates and total doses of gonadotropin per cycle and per pregnancy. RESULTS: Laboratory and clinical protocols remained unchanged over time, except for the type of gonadotropin used, which was introduced sequentially (hMG, then HP-hMG, and finally r-hFSH). Live birth rates were not significantly different for hMG (24.4%), HP-hMG (32.4%) and r-hFSH (30.1%; p = 0.09) groups. Total dose of gonadotropin per cycle was significantly higher in the hMG (2685 +/- 720 IU) and HP-hMG (2903 +/- 867 IU) groups compared with the r-hFSH-group (2268 +/- 747 IU; p < 0.001). Total dose of gonadotropin required to achieve clinical pregnancy was 15.7% and 11.0% higher for the hMG and HP-hMG groups, respectively, compared with the r-hFSH group, and for live births, the differences observed were 45.3% and 19.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although similar live birth rates were achieved, markedly lower doses of r-hFSH were required compared with hMG or HP-hMG.

Safety of Follitropin Alfa/Lutropin Alfa for Stimulation of Follicular Development.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) is used in a fixed-ratio combination with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) for the stimulation of follicular development. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article was to conduct a review of safety data to evaluate the risks of r-hFSH/r-hLH treatment. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Global Safety Database (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) including reports from healthcare professionals, patients, health authorities, clinical trials, non-interventional studies, and the literature. Reports of important risks (identified and potential) as per the risk management plan applicable at the time of data retrieval were obtained up to December 2017. The estimated patient exposure to r-hFSH/r-hLH in the post-marketing setting was 427,012 treatment cycles. Nine hundred patients received r-hFSH/r-hLH during company-sponsored clinical trials (pre- and post-marketing). RESULTS: We identified 72 case reports describing important risks related to r-hFSH/r-hLH use, including 46 cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (10.8 per 100,000 treatment cycles) and 24 of hypersensitivity reaction (5.6 per 100,000 treatment cycles). No thromboembolic events were reported. One congenital anomaly, not suspected to be related to r-hFSH/r-hLH use, was reported during a clinical trial; the event was resolved by corrective surgery. Two fatal cases were identified; one case of recurrent malignant melanoma (suspected to be related to r-hFSH/r-hLH use) and one case resulting from complications of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. CONCLUSION: Cumulative reporting rates of important identified and potential risks of r-hFSH/r-hLH during a 10-year surveillance period demonstrate the benefit-risk balance is positive. This post-marketing surveillance and continued surveillance of safety events should provide reassurance about the use of r-hFSH/r-hLH in clinical practice.

Assessment of the biopotency of follitropin alfa and lutropin alfa combined in one injection: a comparative trial in Sprague-Dawley rats.

BACKGROUND: The current study was designed to determine if follitropin alfa (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone; r-hFSH) and lutropin alfa (recombinant human luteinizing hormone; r-hLH) biopotencies were unchanged by reconstituting in sterile water for injection and mixing prior to injection. METHODS: The biopotencies of r-hFSH and r-hLH were determined following injection of female Sprague-Dawley rats with a mixture of follitropin alfa revised formulation female (RFF) and lutropin alfa (1:1, r-hFSH:r-hLH). Biopotencies of follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa were measured using ovarian weight and ascorbic acid depletion assays, respectively, and compared with a reference standard. Stock mixtures of follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa (1:1) were prepared within 1 h prior to each respective assay's injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C. Separate low dose (follitropin alfa RFF 1.5 IU/rat, lutropin alfa 2 IU/rat) and high dose (follitropin alfa RFF 3 IU/rat, lutropin alfa 8 IU/rat) treatments were prepared from stock mixtures or individual solutions by diluting with 0.22% bovine serum albumin saline solution and injected within 1 h of preparation. The main outcome measures were ovarian weight and ovarian ascorbic acid depletion. RESULTS: FSH bioactivities were similar (p > 0.10) between the individual follitropin alfa RFF test solution (84.2 IU) and follitropin alfa RFF/lutropin alfa (87.6 IU) mixtures prepared within 1 h of injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C. LH bioactivities were similar (p > 0.10) between lutropin alfa (94.7 IU) test solution and lutropin alfa/follitropin alfa RFF (85.3 IU) mixtures prepared within 1 h of injection and stored at 6 +/- 2 degrees C for not more than 1 h prior to injection. CONCLUSION: Mixing follitropin alfa RFF and lutropin alfa did not alter the bioactivity of either FSH or LH.

The HOPE Registry: first US registry for oocyte cryopreservation.

The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) Registry is an initiative of EMD Serono which aims to systematically track the outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation cycles and validate the efficacy and safety of techniques to freeze and thaw oocytes. Beginning in November 2008 (ASRM, San Francisco, CA), the registry will be performed as a national Phase IV observational 5-year study (including 3 years of enrolment and 2 years follow-up of babies born) in the USA and will enrol approximately 400 women of reproductive age who have thawed frozen oocytes for subsequent use through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET). Data relating to controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, freezing and thawing of oocytes, culture and transfer of resulting embryos, implantation rates, pregnancy outcomes and information on child health and development after birth and at 12 months will be recorded. It is anticipated that the HOPE Registry will provide answers to various unresolved questions from healthcare providers and their patients who use oocyte cryopreservation to preserve fertility, such as oocyte cryopreservation and thawing techniques and other factors associated with successful cycle outcomes.

Nurse evaluation of the redesigned fertility pen injector: a questionnaire-based observational survey.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the wide-ranging role nurses have in supporting patients undergoing fertility treatment, we recorded the learning/teaching expectations and experiences of nurses using a redesigned fertility pen injector. METHODS: This was a multicentre, simulated-use study, using unbranded placebo-filled pens. Before teaching patients, nurses were given free choice to rank the importance of the device attributes and predict the level of patient anxiety. Nurses taught 2-5 patients how to prepare the device, inject the dose and complete an incomplete dose. They rated the teaching experience on a 5-point scale during a questionnaire interview. RESULTS: Thirty nurses were enrolled across four countries. All nurses found the redesigned fertility pen injector easy to use and teach. 90% found the overall administration process easy to learn and teach. More than 80% (range 83%-100%) found each of the steps easy (score 4 or 5), and most found the steps easier to teach than expected (score 4 or 5; range 57%-90%). 97% would recommend the redesigned fertility pen injector to a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses rated the redesigned fertility pen injector easy to learn and use and easier to teach than expected. Most would recommend the device to a colleague.

Patients' return to referring physicians and its relation to their infertility duration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if length of patient-reported infertility prior to referral to a specialist is related to the likelihood that the patient will return to the referring physician for obstetrical care. METHODS: A review of our medical record database identified 430 consecutive pregnant patients, discharged between January 1, 2003, and March 1, 2004. The name of the referring and discharge obstetrician(s), duration of infertility, prior use of clomiphene citrate, and number of previous clomiphene treatment cycles were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 430 patients, 305 (71%) had information about the referring and discharge obstetrician(s) and complete records regarding prior treatment. Median duration of infertility was 1.3 years (range 0.2-12 years). Fifty-five percent (167 of 305) of patients returned to their referring physician for obstetrical care. If patients were referred prior to 6 months of treatment by the referring obstetrician, 76% (35 of 46) returned. If patients were referred after 6 months to 1 year of treatment, 67% (82 of 122) returned. If after 1-2 years, 35% (33 of 94), and after more than 2 years, 40% (10 of 25) returned to their referring physician. Overall, 25% of patients (77 of 305) patients had preliminary treatment with clomiphene citrate. If the referring physician did not give the patient clomiphene citrate, 55% (128 of 232) returned to that physician; if the patient had been given one to four clomiphene cycles, 54% (37 of 69) returned, and if given more than four cycles, 25% (2 of 8) returned. CONCLUSIONS: Although many factors may affect a patient's decision to return to the referring doctor, patient satisfaction with the referring physician may be related to timely referral to a specialist.

Patient evaluation of the redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the overall impressions of learning and subsequent use of the redesigned GONAL-f® (follitropin alfa) pen injector by women with recent or current infertility requiring assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a simulated-use study including 86 women with infertility and 30 fertility nurses. Nurses trained the women on the use of the redesigned pen. The opinions of the women on the pen injector were collected during a questionnaire interview. Fertility nurse opinions on patient anxiety were collected before training. RESULTS: The pen injector was considered easy to learn to use and easy to use, particularly setting the dose and reading the number on the dial. After training, most women felt confident they could self-administer medication without further training. Most women would recommend the redesigned pen injector to friends and family requiring IVF treatment. Overall, fertility nurses overestimated how anxious the women would be when using the pen injector. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that both IVF/ART-experienced and -naïve women with infertility found the redesigned pen injector easy to learn to use and to use.

Dose accuracy of the redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector for infertility treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The prefilled, multi-dose follitropin alfa (GONAL-f®) pen injector was redesigned based upon user feedback, to improve pen functionality. The dose information display was altered with the intention of improving readability and the dosing mechanism hardware was modified to increase robustness. The dose accuracy of the redesigned pen injector was evaluated under different conditions and after handling processes. METHODS: Three studies investigated the dose accuracy of the three presentations (300, 450 and 900 IU) of the redesigned pen injector according to the ISO 11608-1:2012/2014 standard. The dose accuracy was evaluated in cold, standard and warm atmospheres, and subsequent to freefall, vibration, dry-heat, cold-storage and shipping preconditioning. The total extractable volume and dispense force of the pen injector were also investigated. RESULTS: All doses dispensed with all three presentations, under all the conditions examined, were within the limits for accuracy defined by the ISO standard, as was the total extractable volume. The mean ± standard deviation dispense force was 12.5 ± 0.99 and 13.8 ± 1.16 N for the 300 and 900 IU pen injectors, respectively. These are below the upper threshold of the range considered optimal for pen injectors. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that the redesigned pen injector functions reliably, dispensing accurate doses under the range of conditions studied.

Usability engineering study in the European Union of a redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector for infertility treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The prefilled, multidose, GONAL-f (®) (follitropin alfa) pen injector was redesigned to improve ease of use and pen functionality. This usability engineering evaluation aimed to demonstrate that the redesigned pen injector could be used by the intended users to safely and effectively deliver follitropin alfa. METHODS: Formative and summative usability engineering evaluations of the pen injector, training and instructions for use (IFU) were conducted. This included an expert review, and formative and summative evaluations involving patients with infertility and fertility nurses. For the summative evaluation, participants received training and subsequently performed tasks based on three selected hazard-related use scenarios to evaluate real-world use, including simulated injections. RESULTS: The formative evaluations confirmed that the pen injector was ready for summative evaluation. Task performance was high in the summative evaluation for both patients and nurses; the tasks that were observed to be most difficult to complete were priming the pen, completing an incomplete injection and completing the treatment diary. Participants rated the device as having above average usability. Most patients ranked the overall system (pen injector, device training and IFU) and its individual components to be either 'extremely easy' or 'somewhat easy' to use. CONCLUSIONS: These usability engineering evaluations demonstrated that patients and nurses could safely and effectively use the redesigned GONAL-f pen injector, and that they also found the IFU and device training to be easy to use.

The recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: results of patient and nurse human factors usability testing.

OBJECTIVES: The first prefilled pen for administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) has been developed. Usability testing was undertaken to evaluate the risk of dosing errors versus the existing r-hCG prefilled syringe, and assess function and handling of the pen. METHODS: Infertile women who were trying to conceive, and specialist nurses, were recruited in Germany. Usability goals were defined and categorized as critical or functional operational goals. Individual, non-interventional, standardized, usability tests (including ease-of-use assessment) were performed with patients and nurses. Cumulative test scores for critical operations were compared. Non-standardized qualitative analyses of nurse-patient training sessions were performed. RESULTS: The cumulative test score for the r-hCG prefilled pen was better than that of the existing prefilled syringe, so it was concluded that the overall risk of dosing errors was not higher with the pen. The ease of use of the pen was rated favorably by patients and nurses. Both user groups were confident that they could inject the correct dose using the pen. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of dosing errors was not higher with the r-hCG prefilled pen than the existing prefilled syringe. The ease-of-use of the r-hCG prefilled pen was rated favorably by patients and nurses.

Anastrozole versus clomiphene citrate: which is better for ovulation induction?

Although anastrozole may be used as an oral therapeutic agent in ovulation induction, it is not recommended as a replacement for clomiphene citrate. On the basis of two phase 2 studies, anastrozole should be viewed as a second-tier therapy after clomiphene citrate in anovulatory patients.

Anastrozole vs. clomiphene citrate in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction: a phase II, randomized, dose-finding study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine an effective multiple-dose regimen of anastrozole compared with clomiphene citrate (CC) to induce follicular growth and ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction. DESIGN: Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-finding, noninferiority study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENT(S): Infertile women (n = 271) with ovulatory dysfunction, aged 18-40 years, with body mass index <37 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION(S): Five days of anastrozole at 1, 5, or 10 mg/d or CC at 50 mg/d. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the ovulation rate (mid-luteal phase serum P level ≥ 10 ng/mL or clinical pregnancy) in the first treatment cycle (cycle 1). RESULT(S): In cycle 1 the ovulation rates for anastrozole at 1, 5, and 10 mg/d were 30.4% (n = 24), 36.8% (n = 28), and 35.9% (n = 14), respectively, compared with 64.9% (n = 50) for CC at 50 mg/d. In up to three cycles of treatment, cumulative ovulation rates did not differ between groups. No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were reported, and both anastrozole and CC were well tolerated. CONCLUSION(S): In terms of ovulation rates, 5-day anastrozole at 1, 5, and 10 mg/d was less effective than CC at 50 mg/d for cycle 1 (noninferiority was not shown).

Anastrozole single-dose protocol in women with oligo- or anovulatory infertility: results of a randomized phase II dose-response study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of anastrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) on follicular development and ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction. DESIGN: Phase II, prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter, dose-finding, noninferiority study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENT(S): Infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction, aged 18-35 years, and body mass index <35 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION(S): Single-dose anastrozole at 5 mg (n = 39), 10 mg (n = 39), 20 mg (n = 39), or 30 mg (n = 38) or a 5-day course of CC at 50 mg/d (n = 39) as starting doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the ovulation rate in the first treatment cycle (cycle 1). Ovulation was defined as a midluteal phase serum P level ≥ 10 ng/mL or clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): In cycle 1 the ovulation rates for a single dose of anastrozole at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg were 46.2%, 41.0%, 23.1%, and 28.9%, respectively, whereas that for CC at 50 mg/d was 61.5%. Among women with fewer than six menses per year, the cumulative ovulation rates over three cycles were comparable in the anastrozole 5 mg (52.4%) and CC 50 mg/d (42.3%) groups. CONCLUSION(S): In terms of ovulation rates in cycle 1, single-dose anastrozole at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg was not as effective as CC at 50 mg/d for 5 days (noninferiority was not shown).

The redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector: results of the patient and nurse human factors usability testing.

OBJECTIVES: A redesigned pen injector for administration of follitropin alfa (follitropin α) has been developed for use in fertility treatment cycles. Pre-summative and summative usability testing was undertaken to assess the risk of dosing errors compared with the existing follitropin α pen. The study also assessed proper use of and dose selection with the redesigned pen. METHODS: Infertile women who were trying to conceive and specialist nurses were recruited from four cities in Germany. Usability goals relating to proper use of the pen device were defined from a risk assessment and further categorized as critical and functional operational goals. Individual, non-interventional, standardized, usability tests were performed with patients and nurses by four experienced research professionals using questionnaires that also included ease-of-use ratings. A non-standardized qualitative analysis of nurse-patient training sessions was performed in the presence of a research professional; reasons for confidence, safety, possible misunderstandings and risks when handling the pen were noted. RESULTS: The overall risk of dosing errors with the redesigned pen was not higher than with the existing pen. No unexpected operational risks and no major concerns regarding the risk of misuse or dosing errors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides useful practical information on the redesigned pen from both patient and nurse perspectives.