Assessing liver function by liver enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MRI to determine the hepatic functional reserve expressed by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with normal liver function (NLF; MELD score ≤ 10) and 29 patients with impaired liver function (ILF; MELD score > 10) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent at 3T. T1-weighted volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences with fat suppression were acquired before and 20 min after contrast injection. Relative enhancement (RE) between plain signal intensity and contrast-enhanced signal intensity was calculated and was used to determine Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake into the liver parenchyma for patients with different MELD scores. RESULTS: RE differed significantly (p ≤ 0.001) between patients with NLF (87.2 ± 29.5 %) and patients with ILF (45.4 ± 26.5 %). The optimal cut-off value for RE to differentiate NLF from ILF was 47.7 % (AUC 0.87). This cut-off value showed a sensitivity of 82.8 % and a specificity of 92.7 % for the differentiation of the analysed groups. CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in hepatocytes is strongly affected by liver function. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and assessment of RE during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) may serve as a useful image-based test in liver imaging for determining regional and global liver function. KEY POINTS: Hepatic uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is strongly affected by liver function. Relative enhancement during HBP in GD-EOB-DTPA MRI correlates with the MELD score. Assessment of relative enhancement may help improve treatment in routine clinical practice.

Memantine fails to facilitate partial cigarette deprivation in smokers--no role of Memantine in the treatment of nicotine dependency?

The efficacy of Memantine in the treatment of nicotine dependency in humans remained to be evaluated. The aims of our pilot study were to investigate (1) the effectiveness of Memantine in facilitating smoking reduction and (2) the influence of Memantine on the perception of nicotine. In order to achieve these aims we conducted a placebo controlled double-blind parallel group study in smokers (n = 20 per group). Before the beginning of the treatment-phase (10/20 mg Memantine per day) all participants were instructed to reduce smoking (partial deprivation). Before and during partial deprivation we registered the daily cigarette consumption and craving estimates. Following nasal stimulation with nicotine enantiomers hedonic and intensity estimates and the discrimination ability were assessed. Memantine failed to facilitate smoking reduction and did not influence the perception of nicotine with the exception of a weak reduction of olfactory intensity estimates reaching statistical significance for one nicotine enantiomer only.

[Structure quality in outpatient care of chronic pain patients]. / Strukturqualität in der ambulanten Versorgung chronisch schmerzkranker Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Outcome quality of medical treatment depends on structure quality of the treatment facility. In the present study we tried evaluate structural parameters of outpatient treatment facilities relating to management of headache, low back pain and cancer pain. METHODS: 109 outpatient treatment facilities (104 offices, 3 outpatient departments of hospitals, 2 pain ambulances of hospitals) in middle franconia, one of the larger Bavarian administrative division (population: 1,6 Mio.), have been evaluated by questionnaires. Questions examined certain structural conditions of the treatment facility as compared to german guidelines for outpatient treatment of pain patients ("Schmerztherapievereinbarung"). RESULTS: Only one treatment facility worked within an interdisciplinary setting. Less than 25% (median) of total patients of an outpatient treatment facility suffered from acute or chronic headache, low back pain or cancer pain. 38% of physicians participated regularly on pain conferences. Established methods for diagnosis and documentation of patients suffering from chronic headache, chronic back pain and cancer pain were regularly used by 16%, 12% and 10% of physicians, respectively. Regular interdisciplinary cooperation in the management of patients with chronic headache, chronic back pain and cancer pain was indicated by 28%, 24% and 41% of physicians, respectively. However, personal discussion of patient related problems took place in less than 5% of physicians. Although a considerable number of different therapies (included as standard therapy for outpatient management of chronic pain in the "Schmerztherapievereinbarung") can be applied in each outpatient treatment facility (median:5), psychological therapy for management of chronic headache, chronic back pain and cancer pain was used regularly by 5%, 2% and 7% of physicians, respectively. Scoring of all examined structural parameters provides a measure for the quality of the parameters of a certain outpatient treatment facility as compared to that of an optimal outpatient facility for pain treatment (quality score=100%). However, 75% of examined outpatient treatment facilities reached quality scores only up to 43%. CONCLUSIONS: There are considerable structural deficits in outpatient treatment facilities involved in management of patients suffering from chronic headache, chronic back pain and cancer pain. Realisation of standards according to the "Schmerztherapievereinbarung" needs organisation of an interdisciplinary network between the different specialties necessary for pain management. Interdisciplinary cooperation should be supported by the official organization of the medical self-government in Germany--the Kassenärztliche Vereinigung--which has to assure optimal conditions for outpatient treatments.