RESUMO
Five prospective, multicentre adult renal studies of three yr duration conducted in Europe for which tacrolimus was used as the primary immunosuppressant in at least one treatment arm was identified. This was confirmed by literature review as the only source fulfilling these criteria. Our goal was to identify absolute (reported) incidences of malignancies in patients exposed to tacrolimus and relative rates as a proportion of the total malignancies recorded for three yr after transplant. The five studies provided 2435 patients in nine different treatment regimens. All regimens combined tacrolimus with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids except for one regimen which also employed daclizumab without corticosteroids. There were 83 patients with malignancies or 3.4% of the total population. No patient experienced more than I malignancy type. Malignancy incidences relative to those patients experiencing a malignancy were: total skin 37.3%, lymphoma 15.7%, and non-skin-non-lymphoma 47.0%. Annual occurrence of all malignancies reflected a progressive increase with time. While the larger proportion of lymphoma and non-skin-non-lymphoma malignancies occurred during the first year after transplant, malignancies affecting the skin increased more linearly with time. These findings are consistent with reports in the literature, reflect the current established experience with tacrolimus to date, and should provide a robust basis for future comparisons with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
Assuntos
Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Azatioprina/administração & dosagem , Daclizumabe , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Linfoma/induzido quimicamente , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Two large, prospective studies (12-03; OSAKA) compared the efficacy and tolerability of prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients also receiving mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose corticosteroids (without induction therapy). METHODS: Data were combined into one database to compare results over 24 weeks using 3 alternative endpoints: biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR); the Food and Drug Administration composite endpoint (graft loss, BCAR, and loss to follow-up), and the European Medicines Agency composite endpoint (graft loss, BCAR, and graft dysfunction). The 95% confidence intervals were calculated (10% noninferiority margin). RESULTS: Overall, 633 patients received prolonged-release tacrolimus (12-03, n = 331; OSAKA, n = 302) and 645 received immediate-release tacrolimus (n = 336; n = 309). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Proportionately more patients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus had trough levels of 5-15 ng/mL on day 1 (60.8%) and 2 (56.6%) versus immediate-release tacrolimus (42.5% and 43.9%, respectively, both P < .001). Efficacy of prolonged-release and immediate-release tacrolimus were similar as assessed by BCAR (13.9% vs 14.1%, respectively), European Medicines Agency composite endpoint (40.3% vs 38.3%) and US Food and Drug Administration composite endpoint (21.5% vs 19.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Novel efficacy endpoints as required by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration demonstrate noninferiority of prolonged-release versus immediate-release tacrolimus. Significantly more patients treated with prolonged-release tacrolimus versus immediate-release tacrolimus achieved trough levels of 5 to 15 ng/mL early after transplantation. ClinicalTrials.govNCT00189839; NCT00717470.
Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
The success rate of pancreas transplantation allows us to study in more detail the potential beneficial effects of normoglycemia on secondary complications in diabetes mellitus. We report a prospective follow-up (mean 26 mo) of metabolic control, neuropathy, retinopathy, and peripheral microcirculation in 31 patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes (mean age 33 +/- 1 yr; mean duration of diabetes 21 +/- 1 yr) after combined kidney and segmental pancreas grafting. All patients had normal HbA1 levels. Glucose tolerance (GT), insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon were normal in 22 patients, and impaired oral GT with reduced insulin secretory capacity was seen in 9 patients. During follow-up, there was no deterioration of GT and insulin release. Vascular risk factors, e.g., hypertension, cholesterol, and triglycerides, decreased after grafting. Autonomic neuropathy improved clinically, and R-R variation increased significantly in 3 of 18 patients. Peripheral neuropathy improved clinically in 46% of patients and did not deteriorate in the others. Motor nerve conduction velocity increased greater than 20% in 8, less than 20% in 12, and was unchanged in 8 of 28 recipients. Most of the patients (n = 30) had pretransplant laser treatment of their advanced retinopathy. Posttransplant visual acuity improved at least more than one line in 56%, stabilized in 32%, and deteriorated in 12% of patients. Patients with functioning grafts for greater than 1 yr had no further deterioration of visual acuity. Vitreous hemorrhage frequency and severity dropped markedly from pretransplant (from 69 to 24%) 10 mo after grafting. Retinal morphology remained stable in all eyes except two.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Pâncreas , Adulto , Glicemia/análise , Peptídeo C/sangue , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Glucagon/sangue , Humanos , Insulina/sangue , Masculino , Microcirculação , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
In a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, the effect of rh-SOD, given in a dose of 200 mg intravenously during surgery to cyclosporine-treated recipients of cadaveric renal allografts, on both acute and chronic rejection events as well as patient and graft survival was investigated by analyzing the patients' charts retrospectively. The results obtained show that rh-SOD exerts a beneficial effect on acute rejection events as indicated by a significant reduction of (1) first acute rejection episodes from 33.3% in controls to 18.5%, as well as (2) early irreversible acute rejection from 12.5% in controls to 3.7%. With regard to long-term results, there was a significant improvement of the actual 4-year graft survival rate in rh-SOD-treated patients to 74% (with a projected half-life of 15 years) compared with 52% in controls (with an extrapolated half-life of 5 years). The beneficial effect of rh-SOD observed in this trial is not fully understood, although one can assume that the effect is related to its antioxidant action on ischemia/reperfusion injury of the renal allograft, thereby potentially reducing the immunogenicity of the graft. In addition and in accordance with the "response-to-injury hypothesis" in the pathogenesis of general atherosclerosis, rh-SOD has the potential to mitigate free radical-mediated reperfusion injury-induced acute endothelial cell damage that potentially may contribute to the process of chronic obliterative rejection arteriosclerosis.
Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim , Superóxido Dismutase/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Superóxido Dismutase/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Supplementation of immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been found to reduce the rate of acute rejection in renal transplantation. We report a dose-finding study for MMF when administered in combination with low-dose tacrolimus and corticosteroid prophylaxis in cadaveric renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two patients at 16 centers were enrolled in this randomized, parallel-group study. The three treatment groups were tacrolimus and corticosteroids (MMF-0 group, n=82); tacrolimus, corticosteroids, and 1 g of MMF daily (MMF-1 g group, n=79); and tacrolimus, corticosteroids, and 2 g of MMF daily (MMF-2 g group, n=71). Study duration was 6 months, and patients were followed up for patient and graft survival for 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months posttransplantation, daily doses of 1 g and 2 g of MMF were associated with significantly lower rates of acute rejection compared with tacrolimus alone. The Kaplan-Meier rates were 48.5%, 24.9%, and 22.9%, respectively, for the three treatment groups when acute rejection was determined by clinical criteria (P=0.007). At month 12, patient survival rates were 100%, 97.5%, and 97.2% and graft survival rates were 90.2%, 92.4%, and 93.0% for the MMF-0 group, MMF-1 g group, and the MMF-2 g group, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events and leukopenia were higher in the MMF groups, especially in the MMF-2 g group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose tacrolimus combined with a MMF dose of 1 g daily and corticosteroids provided an optimized efficacy and safety profile. A higher dose of MMF (2 g) was associated with greater toxicity without a significant improvement in efficacy.
Assuntos
Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Cadáver , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Análise de Sobrevida , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To confirm the results of a number of studies conducted in Europe, the United States, and Japan, this multicenter, randomized trial compared the 12-month efficacy and safety of tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in the prevention of renal allograft rejection. METHODS: A total of 448 renal transplant recipients were recruited from 15 centers and assigned to receive triple-drug therapy consisting of tacrolimus (n=303) or cyclosporine (n=145) in conjunction with azathioprine and low-dose corticosteroids. RESULTS: At 12 months after transplantation, tacrolimus therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the frequency of both acute (tacrolimus 25.9% vs. cyclosporine 45.7%; P<0.001 [absolute difference: 19.8%, 95% confidence interval: 10.0-29.6%]) and corticosteroid-resistant rejection (11.3% vs. 21.6%; P=0.001 [absolute difference: 10.3%, 95% confidence interval: 2.5-18.2%]). Actuarial 1-year patient (tacrolimus 93.0% vs. cyclosporine 96.5%; P=0.140) and graft survival rates (82.5% vs. 86.2%; P=0.380) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Overall, the safety profiles of the tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based regimens were quite comparable. Infections, renal impairment, neurological complications, and gastrointestinal complaints were frequently reported but were mostly reversible in both groups. Higher incidences of elevated serum creatinine, tremor, diarrhea, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, and angina pectoris were reported in the tacrolimus treatment group, whereas acne, arrhythmia, gingival hyperplasia, and hirsutism were more frequent with cyclosporine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in the incidence of episodes of allograft rejection observed with tacrolimus therapy may have important long-term implications given the prognostic influence of rejection on graft survival.