Can a Social Media Application be a Valid Educational Tool for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND: TikTok (ByteDance, Beijing, China) is the fastest growing social media application (SMA) to date and has become a major source of information for medicine. The rising use of media platforms by patients and practitioners alike plays a significant role in the perception of healthcare. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify the presence and popularity of oral and maxillofacial surgery content on the SMA, to measure whether the information shared is useful for viewers, and whether there are differences in quality of the videos between video content producer groups. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE: A cross-sectional study was used to evaluate oral and maxillofacial surgery content on the SMA. Included videos were published during a 3-month period (November 16, 2021 to February 17, 2022) and mentioned "oral surgery" or "wisdom teeth" in the video description, title, or hashtag. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The independent variable was video content producer-content created by health professionals versus laypersons. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Quality of each video was determined by the information in the video and its usefulness, using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) criteria. COVARIATES: Topic was categorized as educational or anecdotal. Popularity was measured by the number of likes accumulated. ANALYSES: Statistical analysis was performed using 2-sample t-tests. Statistical significance was achieved with a P value < .05 with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of 558 videos searched, 426 videos met study criteria. GQS score was greater in health professional videos (MHP = 3.30) versus layperson videos (ML = 2.05) (P < .05). Most video content producers were laypersons (69%) and videos were mostly anecdotal (87%). Health professional videos had greater popularity than layperson videos (P < .05). Health professionals and laypersons averaged 25,148 likes and 2,109 likes, respectively. All videos combined totaled 3,939,685 likes. CONCLUSION: By analyzing GQS and the popularity of videos, it has shown that health professionals produced higher quality videos along with greater number of likes. With 39% of videos by health professionals being educational, it shows that we are using the SMA to instruct patients. However, there is still room to produce more educational rather than anecdotal videos with the goal to provide accurate information to patients.

A Snapshot on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Resident Scholarly Activity: Can We Do Better?

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) requires oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residents to engage in scholarly activity. Currently, it is unknown how this mandate translates into research output. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the research output of OMS residents. In addition, we sought to identify characteristics associated with resident productivity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of all OMS residents during the 2021-2022 academic year. Attempts were made to obtain resident rosters from every CODA-accredited OMS program. Resident names were searched in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to identify peer-reviewed publications. Postgraduate year (PGY), program name, and total publication count during residency were recorded for each resident. Academic status and fellowship affiliation of the residency program were also included. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The primary predictor was PGY level of each resident. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The main outcome variable was the publication count of each OMS resident during the 2021-2022 academic year. COVARIATES: The covariates were the academic status and the fellowship affiliation of the residency program. A program was determined academic if they were associated with a dental or medical school. A program was determined fellowship associated if they had any CODA approved fellowship. ANALYSES: Simple bivariate comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Complete resident rosters were identified for 87 residency programs. One thousand one hundred thirty two residents were queried and a total of 548 peer-reviewed publications were identified. There was a mean of 6.30 publications per program and 0.43 publications per resident. More than half of all residents had no identifiable publication. PGY5 residents averaged the most publications per resident (1.45) followed by PGY6 (1.04) and PGY4 (0.63). Academic programs had significantly more publications per resident than nonacademic programs (median of 3.00 vs 0.00, P = .02). Programs with a fellowship association also had more publications per resident (median of 5.00 vs 2.00, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Current CODA research requirements do not translate into resident publications. Publication counts appeared to slightly increase with PGY level; however, OMS resident productivity still lags far behind that of other surgical subspecialties.

Efficacy and safety of a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch for treatment of erosive oral lichen planus: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the oral mucosa. Currently there is no approved treatment for OLP. We report on the efficacy and safety of a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch (Rivelin® -CLO) for the treatment of OLP. METHODS: Patients with confirmed OLP and measurable symptomatic ulcer(s) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial testing a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch (Rivelin® -CLO) in OLP across Europe, Canada, and the United States. Patients were randomized to placebo (nonmedicated), 1, 5, 20 µg Clobetasol/patch, twice daily, for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in total ulcer area compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints included improvement from baseline in pain, disease activity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Data were analyzed and expressed as mean [SD]. One hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the study; 99 females and 39 males, mean age was 61.1 [11.6] years. Statistical analyses revealed that treatment with 20-µg Rivelin® -CLO patches demonstrated significant improvement with ulcer area (p = 0.047), symptom severity (p = 0.001), disease activity (p = 0.022), pain (p = 0.012), and quality of life (p = 0.003) as compared with placebo. Improvement in OLP symptoms from beginning to the end of the study was reported as very much better (best rating) in the 20-µg group (25/32) patients compared to the placebo group (11/30), (p = 0.012). Adverse events were mild/moderate. Candidiasis incidence was low (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Rivelin® -CLO patches were superior to placebo demonstrating statistically significant, clinically relevant efficacy in objective and subjective improvement and, with a favorable safety profile.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in the Pediatric Population.

PURPOSE: Few reports have investigated medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in the pediatric population. The study purpose was to measure the frequency of MRONJ in pediatric patients receiving antiresorptive medications at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case series was granted an exemption by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The primary outcome variable was the presence or absence of MRONJ. Other variables of interest included 1) age at first dose of antiresorptive; 2) sex; 3) antiresorptive medication received; 4) reason for antiresorptive; 5) dental records available; 6) dental extractions that occurred after the start of antiresorptive; 7) exposure to immunosuppressants/chemotherapy; 8) time interval from the last dose of antiresorptive to dental extractions; and 9) longest follow-up after starting antiresorptive. Frequencies and proportions were calculated for categorical data. Medians, means, and standard deviations were calculated for continuous data. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 122 subjects. We observed 0 cases of MRONJ during the study interval. At the start of antiresorptive treatment, the average age was 8.18 years (range 0.02-17; standard deviation (SD) 5.15). There were 67 males (55%) and 55 females (45%). The reason for antiresorptive treatment was osteogenesis imperfecta in 36 patients, malignancy in 6 patients, and other in 80 patients. Thirty patients received pamidronate, 72 received zoledronate, 17 received a combination, and 3 received only denosumab. A total of 16 patients had exposure to immunosuppressants and/or chemotherapy. The average follow-up time was 4.89 years (median 4 years). Twenty-six patients underwent dental extractions of 74 teeth following antiresorptive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: While there were no reported cases of MRONJ in the present study, it is advisable to monitor pediatric patients who have received antiresorptive treatment closely. When possible, appropriate dental treatment should be completed prior to starting antiresorptive therapy. In the absence of reported MRONJ cases, dental extractions should not be withheld because of previous antiresorptive exposure and antiresorptive medication dosing need not be altered in the pediatric population.

Is a Medical Degree Associated With Faculty Leadership Position Attainment in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Programs?

PURPOSE: The decision to obtain double-degree versus single-degree training in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) has been a widely debated topic in the United States over the past several decades. The purpose of this study is to determine if OMS faculty holding leadership positions (ie, program directors and chairs/chiefs) are more likely to be single-degree trained versus double-degree trained. METHODS: The authors designed a cross-sectional observational study to address the research purpose. The primary predictor variable was faculty leadership education (single-degree trained vs double-degree trained). The secondary predictor variable was accredited OMS program type led by the faculty with leadership positions (double-degree, both single-degree and double-degree, single-degree, or military program). The primary outcome variable was faculty leadership position (program director or chair/chief). Sums and percentages were calculated and Chi-squared (χ2) tests were used to compare the faculty leadership education with faculty leadership positions for each group. P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 198 subjects, of which 99 subjects were identified as program directors and 99 subjects were identified as chairs/chiefs. There was no statistically significant difference between the proportions of program directors and chairs/chiefs who were single-degree trained versus double-degree trained when looking at all accredited OMS programs in the United States (52.5% vs 47.5%, P = .615 and 56.6% vs 43.4%, P = .191, respectively). However, program directors of double-degree programs were statistically significantly more likely to be double-degree trained than single-degree trained (77.1% vs 22.9%, P = .001) and program directors and chairs/chiefs of single-degree programs were statistically significantly more likely to be single-degree trained than double-degree trained (67.4% vs 32.6%, P = .022 and 65.1% vs 34.9%, P = .047, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, no statistically significant difference exists between the proportions of program directors and chairs/chiefs that were single-degree trained versus double-degree trained at accredited OMS programs. However, when stratifying programs by program type, program directors of double-degree programs were statistically significantly more likely to be double-degree trained and program directors and chairs/chiefs of single-degree programs were statistically significantly more likely to be single-degree trained.

The Cost of Surgically Treated Severe Odontogenic Infections: A Retrospective Study Using Severity Scores.

PURPOSE: Hospital treatment of odontogenic infections can be costly, and often these infections present with varying degrees of severity that can be quantified with odontogenic infection severity scores (OISSs). The purposes of this study were (1) to measure the association between OISSs and hospital bills and (2) to identify risk factors associated with OISSs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed subjects from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, with severe odontogenic infections treated in the operating room and admitted to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Parkland Memorial Hospital for >1 hospital day. OISSs were assigned based on the risk to the airway and vital structures. OISSs ≥ 5 were designated group A and < OISSs 5 group B. The primary predictor variable was OISSs, and the primary outcome variable was the mean billed cost of the stay. Analysis to identify associated variables for OISS ≥ 5 was also conducted. Secondary predictor variables were age, gender, smoking status, HIV diagnosis, diabetes mellitus diagnosis, blood glucose at admission, and white blood cell count (WBC) at admission. The secondary outcome variable was OISS. Comparisons between Group A and Group B were conducted using t-tests. Analysis to identify associated variables for OISS ≥ 5 was conducted using univariate and multivariate analysis. Values of P < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 144 subjects that met inclusion criteria. There were 65 subjects in Group A and 69 in Group B. Group A had a significantly larger mean billed cost of stay (95% CI 8937.7 to 48,225.74; P = .001). Analysis of secondary predictor variables revealed that male sex (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.07; P = .03), blood glucose ≥ 100 at presentation (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46 to 6.38; P = .002), and WBC of > 11,000/mL at presentation (OR 3.17; 95% CI 1.44 to 6.98; P = .003) resulted in an increased likelihood of OISS ≥ 5. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OISSs ≥ 5 have higher mean billed costs when compared to patients with OISSs < 5. Male sex, blood glucose ≥ 100, and WBC >11,000/mL at presentation is associated with increased likelihood of OISS >5.

What is the Resident Perception of Physician Assistants in an Oral and Maxillofacial Training Program?

PURPOSE: Physician assistants (PAs) are not employed in a widespread manner in the academic oral and maxillofacial surgery setting despite being able to assist with resident workload. We aim to measure residents' perception of PAs employed by an academic oral and maxillofacial surgery department after the addition of 2 PAs to the department. METHODS: The investigators conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey study addressing resident perception of PA's on reducing their working hours, the scope of PA's role, and the positive and negatives of working with a PA. The survey was distributed to current oral and maxillofacial surgery residents, non-categorical interns, and recent graduates at Parkland Memorial Hospital and John Peter Smith Hospital between November 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. A follow-up survey to collect demographic data was distributed between May 20, 2021 and June 10, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results, with bootstrapping techniques to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Investigators contacted 54 residents and recent alumni, and 31 (57%) responded to the original survey and 32 responded to the follow-up survey. All respondents agreed that the addition of PAs decreased resident workload (100%; 95% CI). The majority stated PAs should assist with rounding on inpatients (61%; 95% CI), in hospital consultations (52%; 95% CI), clinic appointments (74%; 95% CI), and patient care coordination (97%; 95% CI). Only 29% (95% CI) stated that PAs should be assisting in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that residents perceive the addition of PAs to the academic oral and maxillofacial surgery program to be beneficial when it comes to reducing overall workload and increasing potential educational opportunities, by assisting with care coordination, outpatient appointments, and inpatient rounding.

The Early Effects of Coronavirus Disease-2019 on Head and Neck Oncology and Microvascular Reconstruction Practice: A National Survey of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Enrolled in the Head and Neck Special Interest Group.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare systems across the nation. The purpose of this study is to gauge the early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on head and neck oncology and reconstructive surgery (HNORS) practice and evaluate their practice patterns especially ones that might be impacted by COVID-19 and compare them to the current literature. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study that surveyed fellowship-trained oral and maxillofacial surgeons in HNORS. This cohort of surgeons was contacted via a generated email list of surgeons enrolled in the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons pathology special interest group. An electronic survey contained 16 questions to assess the COVID-19 effect on HNORS practice and capture their practice patterns from mid-March to mid-April 2020. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze counts, percentages, and response rates. RESULTS: We had a 60% response rate (39 of 64); 72% of our responders worked at academic institutions, 18% marked themselves as hybrid academic/private practice, and only 10% were considered hospital-based surgeons. Only 8% of the survey respondents were requested to pause head and neck cancer surgery, whereas 24% were requested to pause free flap surgery during the pandemic. Fifty-five percent agreed that the head and neck and reconstructive surgery should be conducted during a pandemic. Finally, 45% thought that two weeks was a reasonable delay for head and neck cancer cases, whereas 29% thought they should not be delayed for any amount of time. Regarding practice patterns, microvascular reconstruction was the favored method (100%). Respondents generally admitted patients to an intensive care unit postoperatively (92%) and were kept on a ventilator (53%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a small impact on the surgical treatment of patients with head and neck oncology. Most HNORS surgeons are practicing in accordance with recently published literature.

Tumorigenic Potential of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy-A Case Report and Review of Literature.

An association between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy (G-CSFT) in patients with glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSDIb) and the development of giant cell lesions of the maxillofacial complex has emerged. We have reported, to the best of our knowledge, the fourth case of giant cell granuloma (GCG) in a patient with GSDIb undergoing G-CSFT. GSDIb can present with hypoglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and neutropenia. G-CSFT has often been used in the treatment of recurrent infections or sepsis caused by neutropenia and to treat inflammatory bowel disease and diarrhea. The current reported data are lacking in both the association and the potential causation of G-CSFT and the development of giant cell tumors. Given the prevalence of GSDIb and its therapy, oral and maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of the tumorigenic potential of G-CSFT in patients with GSDIb. In the present report, we have described the case of a 17-year-old patient with GSDIb undergoing GCSFT who presented with a peripheral and central GCG. She was treated but presented again 13 months later with concerns for a new primary lesion. We have also discussed GSDIb, G-CSFT, and the current data, highlighting the association between G-CSFT for GSDIb, the potential mechanism of GCG development, the use of adjuvant therapy, and the need for close follow-up of this population. The purpose of the present case report is to highlight the presentation, management, and follow-up of giant cell lesions in patients with GSDIb treated with G-CSFT.

What Is the Role of Elective Neck Dissection in the Management of Patients With Buccal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Clinically Negative Neck?

PURPOSE: Buccal squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) is rare in the United States. Given its location, few anatomic barriers to spread exist and it has been found to have a high locoregional recurrence rate. The role of elective neck dissection (END) in patients with clinically negative neck (N0) is not clear. This study aims to answer the following research question: Among patients with N0 BSCC, does END improve locoregional control rates, distant metastasis rates, and 2- and 5-year survival rates? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The sample included patients who received a diagnosis of BSCC. The primary predictor variable was END status (yes or no). Five institutions participated between June 2001 and June 2011: University of Washington, University of Michigan, University of Tennessee, North Memorial Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Minnesota, and Head and Neck Surgical Associates (Portland, OR). The primary outcome variable was locoregional recurrence. Secondary outcome variables were distant metastasis and 2- and 5-year survival rates. Other variables collected were demographic characteristics, initial operation, adjuvant therapy, clinical and pathologic data, and staging. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 98 patients with clinical N0 BSCC. The mean age was 66 years (range, 30-88 years), and 54% were men. Of the patients, 74 (76%) underwent END. The locoregional recurrence-free rate was 61% for END versus 38% for no END (P = .042). The distant metastasis rate was 4% for END versus 9% for no END. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 91% and 75% (P = .042), respectively, for END and 85% and 63% (P = .019), respectively, for no END. CONCLUSIONS: END had a therapeutic effect, as evidenced by a lower locoregional recurrence rate, lower distant metastasis rate, and improved 2- and 5-year survival rates.

The Double Mandibular Osteotomy for Vascular and Tumor Surgery of the Parapharyngeal Space.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to describe our experience using a double mandibular osteotomy for access to the parapharyngeal space in vascular and tumor surgery and to report on the outcomes and complications of this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed and implemented a case series to review the medical records of all patients treated with a double mandibular osteotomy for parapharyngeal space access from 1994 to 2016. Patient demographic characteristics, indications for the procedure, outcomes, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients underwent a double mandibular osteotomy procedure for access to the parapharyngeal space during the study period. There were 7 men (41%) and 10 women (59%) comprising the cohort. The average age was 57 years (range, 29 to 75 years). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 98 months (mean, 40 months), and 7 patients (41%) were tobacco users at the time of surgery. The most common indication was high internal carotid artery stenosis (n = 6) followed by carotid body paraganglioma (n = 3). Average blood loss was 186 mL, and there were no deaths during the study period. Eight postoperative complications were noted in 7 patients (41%). No procedures were aborted or compromised because of inadequate parapharyngeal space access. All patients showed clinical and radiographic signs of healing of the osteotomy sites. CONCLUSION: The double mandibular osteotomy provides adequate access to the parapharyngeal space for effective tumor removal and high carotid surgical intervention with acceptable patient morbidity and complications.

Does Restriction of Public Health Care Dental Benefits Affect the Volume, Severity, or Cost of Dental-Related Hospital Visits?

PURPOSE: On July 1, 2012, the Illinois legislature passed the Save Medicaid Access and Resources Together (SMART) Act, which restricts adult public dental insurance coverage to emergency-only treatment. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of this restriction on the volume, severity, and treatment costs of odontogenic infections in an urban hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting for odontogenic pain or infection at the University of Illinois Hospital was performed. Data were collected using related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 and divided into 2 cohorts over consecutive 18-month periods. Outcome variables included age, gender, insurance status, oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) consultation, imaging, treatment, treatment location, number of hospital admission days, and inpatient care level. Severity was determined by the presence of OMS consultation, incision and drainage, hospital admission, and cost per encounter. Hospital charges were used to compare the cost of care between cohorts. Between-patients statistics were used to compare risk factors and outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 5,192 encounters identified, 1,405 met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between cohorts for age (P = .28) or gender (P = .43). After passage of the SMART Act, emergency department visits increased 48%, surgical intervention increased 100%, and hospital admission days increased 128%. Patients were more likely to have an OMS consult (odds ratio [OR] = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.81), an incision and drainage (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13-1.94), and a longer hospital admission (P = .04). The average cost per encounter increased by 20% and the total cost of care increased by $1.6 million. CONCLUSION: After limitation of dental benefits, there was an increase in the volume and severity of odontogenic infections. In addition, there was an escalated health care cost. The negative public health effects and increased economic impact of eliminating basic dental care show the importance of affordable and accessible preventative oral health care.

Second Primary Head and Neck Cancers After Non-Head and Neck Primary Cancers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of second primary head and neck cancer development among patients with a primary cancer diagnosed outside the head and neck region, to present the clinical characteristics of this population, and to determine whether any variables are associated with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a case series based on a sample of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer who had previously been diagnosed with cancer located outside the head and neck region. The primary predictor variable was a diagnosis of cancer outside the head and neck region. The primary outcome variable was the diagnosis of a second cancer in the head and neck region. χ2 Goodness-of-fit tests were used to test for differences between the observed and expected rates. RESULTS: A total of 19,406 cancers were diagnosed at the University of Tennessee Cancer Institute during the study period from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2014. The rate of second primary head and neck cancer among patients with a non-head and neck primary cancer was 0.2%. These 40 cancers occurred among a total of 849 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cases (5%) diagnosed during the study period. The most common location for a second primary HNSCC was the gingiva (27.5%), followed by the oral tongue (17.5%). Significantly more gingival cancers were diagnosed than expected (P < .001) and significantly fewer tongue cancers than expected (P = .01). The most common primary cancer was prostate (27.5%), followed by breast (25%). The median survival was 28.5 months after the second primary diagnosis. A nonsignificant effect was found for age (P = .30), tobacco use (P = .12), gender (P = .60), TNM stage (P = .29), and treatment protocol (P = .96) on survival. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a second primary HNSCC in a population of patients with non-head and neck primary cancers is associated with decreased overall survival. The most common presentation of a second primary HNSCC in our study was in the gingiva and the most common primary cancer was in the prostate. Clinicians should consider the increased proportion of gingival cancers in this population when examining patients and be aware of the decrease in overall survival.

External Reference Nasal Pin for Orthognathic Maxillary Positioning: What Is the Proper Method of Placement?

PURPOSE: Intracranial perforation with an external reference nasal pin is a possible complication during maxillary orthognathic surgery. This study attempts to quantify the maximum allowable depth of pin penetration from the soft tissue nasion (STN) and hard tissue nasion (HTN) to the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) and to evaluate the depth and direction of the nasal pin track using postsurgical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients were evaluated. A retrospective cross-sectional chart review evaluated the distance from the STN and HTN to the ACF from random patients on CBCT scans. In addition, a different group of postsurgical orthognathic cases treated between March 2013 and August 2015 were analyzed for the depth and direction of the nasal pin track toward the next anatomic cavity, which included the ACF, frontal sinus, or nasal cavity. RESULTS: We identified 103 random patients, aged 14 to 90 years. The mean distance from the STN to the ACF was 21.85 mm (range, 14.06 to 29.12 mm), and the mean distance from the HTN to the ACF was 14.16 mm (range, 7.35 to 20.53 mm). Forty postsurgical CBCT scans showed an overall nasal pin track depth of 12.91 mm (range, 8.53 to 22.60 mm), with the direction of the pin track toward the nasal cavity in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: The depth of penetration of an external reference nasal pin should be limited to a maximum of 10 to 12 mm from the STN. Initial skin penetration should begin immediately caudal to the STN, and the pin should be directed in a caudal direction to avoid inadvertent entrance into the ACF, as well as to facilitate a relatively safe penetration into the nasal cavity, if the maximum depth is excessive.