RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minor phenomena, including passage phenomena, feeling of presence, and illusions, are common and may represent a prodromal form of psychosis in Parkinson's disease (PD). We examined the prevalence and clinical correlates of minor phenomena, and their potential role as a risk factor for PD psychosis. METHODS: A novel questionnaire, the Psychosis and Mild Perceptual Disturbances Questionnaire for PD (PMPDQ), was completed by Fox Insight cohort participants with and without PD. Additional assessments included the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQuest), REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Single Question Screen (RBD1Q), Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part II, demographic features, and medication usage. For participants with PD, we used regression models to identify clinical associations and predictors of incident psychosis over one year of follow-up. RESULTS: Among participants with PD (n = 5950) and without PD (n = 1879), the prevalence of minor phenomena was 43.1% and 31.7% (P < .001). Of the 3760 participants with PD and no baseline psychosis, independent correlates of minor phenomena included positive responses on the NMSQuest apathy/attention/memory (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.1, P < .001) or sexual function domain (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P = .01) and positive RBD1Q (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.05-1.5, P = .01). Independent risk factors for incident PD psychosis included the presence of minor phenomena (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4-3.9, P < .001), positive response on the NMSQuest apathy/attention/memory domain (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6, P < .001), and positive RBD1Q (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Minor phenomena are common, associated with specific non-motor symptoms, and an independent predictor of incident psychosis in PD.
Assuntos
Apatia , Doença de Parkinson , Transtornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Prevalência , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Apatia/fisiologia , EmoçõesRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Digital technology affords the opportunity to provide objective, frequent, and sensitive assessment of disease outside of the clinic environment. This article reviews recent literature on the application of digital technology in movement disorders, with a focus on Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington's disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has demonstrated the ability for digital technology to discriminate between individuals with and without PD, identify those at high risk for PD, quantify specific motor features, predict clinical events in PD, inform clinical management, and generate novel insights. Digital technology has enormous potential to transform clinical research and care in movement disorders. However, more work is needed to better validate existing digital measures, including in new populations, and to develop new more holistic digital measures that move beyond motor features.
Assuntos
Doença de Huntington , Doença de Parkinson , Tecnologia Digital , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Doença de Parkinson/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The presence of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) as a predictor of cognitive impairment in Parkinson´s disease (PD) has shown conflicting results. Most previous studies only assessed complaints in the memory domain. We investigate the association of SCCs across cognitive domains with development of mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and dementia (PDD) in PD and to assess agreement between SCCs and objective cognitive impairments in this population. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study. Participants were enrolled at six North-American movement disorders centers. They underwent neuropsychological and non-cognitive clinical evaluations, including the modified Neurobehavioral Inventory to elicit SCC (rated by each patient and independently by their close contact (CC)). Associations between SCCs and development of future cognitive impairment were assessed. Agreement between SCCs and objective impairment within the same domain was also calculated. RESULTS: Of 138 included PD patients, 42% fulfilled criteria for PD-MCI. None of the NBI items predicted development of cognitive impairment after one and two years in PD with normal cognition. In PD-MCI patients, SCCs related to attention predicted dementia at year one. CC ratings of SCCs related to memory and language problems predicted PDD in PD-MCI patients. According to CC reported patients' complaints, there was a significant agreement between SCCs and objective cognitive test scores on attention. CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting SCCs including cognitive domains other than memory is crucial for a complete evaluation, including both patient and CC report. Memory, language, and especially attention SCCs in PD-MCI may predict progression to dementia.
Assuntos
Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/etiologia , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Antidepressivos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/tratamento farmacológico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Depressão/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical monitoring of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) for cognitive decline is an important element of care. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been proposed to be a sensitive tool for assessing cognitive impairment in PD. The aim of our study was to compare the responsiveness of the MoCA to decline in cognition to the responsiveness of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson's disease-cognition (SCOPA-Cog). METHODS: PD patients without dementia were enrolled at 6 North American movement disorders centers between 2008 and 2011. Participants received annual evaluations including the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog followed by formal neuropsychological testing. The gold standard for change in cognition was defined as the change on the neuropsychological test scores over the annual assessments. The Reliable Change Method was used to provide an estimate of the probability that a given difference score would be obtained by chance. The sensitivity of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog to change was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were included in the analysis. Participants were followed at mean intervals of 11 ± 2 months for a median of 2 (maximum 5) visits. According to the reliable change index, 56 intervals of cognitive testing showed a decline in global cognition. ROC analysis of change in MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog global scores compared to gold standard testing found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.55 (95% CI 0.48-0.62), 0.56 (0.48-0.63), and 0.63 (0.55-0.70) respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUCs across the tests. The sensitivity of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog to change at various thresholds for decline in scores reached a maximum of 71% for a cut-off of 1 point change on the SCOPA-Cog. CONCLUSION: Using neuropsychological testing as a gold standard comparator, the performance of the MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-Cog for detecting decline in non-demented PD patients over a 1-year interval is poor. This has implications for clinical practice; stable scores may not be taken as reassurance of the absence of cognitive decline.
Assuntos
Demência/psicologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeAssuntos
Antipsicóticos , Doença de Parkinson , Transtornos Psicóticos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Tronco Encefálico , Depressão , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Psicóticos/complicações , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Digital health technologies are growing at a rapid pace and changing the healthcare landscape. Our current understanding of digital health literacy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is limited. In this review, we discuss the potential challenges of low digital health literacy in PD with particular attention to telehealth, deep brain stimulation, wearable sensors, and smartphone applications. We also highlight inequities in access to digital health technologies. Future research is needed to better understand digital health literacy among individuals with PD and to develop effective solutions. We must invest resources to evaluate, understand, and enhance digital health literacy for individuals with PD.
Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Doença de Parkinson , Telemedicina , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Smartphone , Aplicativos MóveisRESUMO
Background: Speech changes are an early symptom of Huntington disease (HD) and may occur prior to other motor and cognitive symptoms. Assessment of HD commonly uses clinician-rated outcome measures, which can be limited by observer variability and episodic administration. Speech symptoms are well suited for evaluation by digital measures which can enable sensitive, frequent, passive, and remote administration. Methods: We collected audio recordings using an external microphone of 36 (18 HD, 7 prodromal HD, and 11 control) participants completing passage reading, counting forward, and counting backwards speech tasks. Motor and cognitive assessments were also administered. Features including pausing, pitch, and accuracy were automatically extracted from recordings using the BioDigit Speech software and compared between the three groups. Speech features were also analyzed by the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) dysarthria score. Random forest machine learning models were implemented to predict clinical status and clinical scores from speech features. Results: Significant differences in pausing, intelligibility, and accuracy features were observed between HD, prodromal HD, and control groups for the passage reading task (e.g., p < 0.001 with Cohen'd = -2 between HD and control groups for pause ratio). A few parameters were significantly different between the HD and control groups for the counting forward and backwards speech tasks. A random forest classifier predicted clinical status from speech tasks with a balanced accuracy of 73% and an AUC of 0.92. Random forest regressors predicted clinical outcomes from speech features with mean absolute error ranging from 2.43-9.64 for UHDRS total functional capacity, motor and dysarthria scores, and explained variance ranging from 14 to 65%. Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were predicted with mean absolute error of 2.3 and explained variance of 30%. Conclusion: Speech data have the potential to be a valuable digital measure of HD progression, and can also enable remote, frequent disease assessment in prodromal HD and HD. Clinical status and disease severity were predicted from extracted speech features using random forest machine learning models. Speech measurements could be leveraged as sensitive marker of clinical onset and disease progression in future clinical trials.
RESUMO
Huntington's disease (HD), like many other neurological disorders, affects both lower and upper limb function that is typically assessed in the clinic - providing a snapshot of disease symptoms. Wearable sensors enable the collection of real-world data that can complement such clinical assessments and provide a more comprehensive insight into disease symptoms. In this context, almost all studies are focused on assessing lower limb function via monitoring of gait, physical activity and ambulation. In this study, we monitor upper limb function during activities of daily living in individuals with HD (n = 16), prodromal HD (pHD, n = 7), and controls (CTR, n = 16) using a wrist-worn wearable sensor, called PAMSys ULM, over seven days. The participants were highly compliant in wearing the sensor with an average daily compliance of 99% (100% for HD, 98% for pHD, and 99% for CTR). Goal-directed movements (GDM) of the hand were detected using a deep learning model, and kinematic features of each GDM were estimated. The collected data was used to predict disease groups (i.e., HD, pHD, and CTR) and clinical scores using a combination of statistical and machine learning-based models. Significant differences in GDM features were observed between the groups. HD participants performed fewer GDMs with long duration (> 7.5 seconds) compared to CTR (p-val = 0.021, d = -0.86). In velocity and acceleration metrics, the highest effect size feature was the entropy of the velocity zero-crossing length segments (HD vs CTR p-val <0.001, d = -1.67; HD vs pHD p-val = 0.043, d=-0.98; CTR vs pHD p-val = 0.046, d=0.96). In addition, this same variable showed a strongest correlation with clinical scores. Classification models achieved good performance in distinguishing HD, pHD and CTR individuals with a balanced accuracy of 67% and a 0.72 recall for the HD group, while regression models accurately predicted clinical scores. Notably the explained variance for the upper extremity function subdomain scale of Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) was the highest, with the model capturing 60% of the variance. Our findings suggest the potential of wearables and machine learning for early identification of phenoconversion, remote monitoring in HD, and evaluating new treatments efficacy in clinical trials and medicine.
RESUMO
The etiologies of Parkinson's disease (PD) remain unclear. Some, such as certain genetic mutations and head trauma, are widely known or easily identified. However, these causes or risk factors do not account for the majority of cases. Other, less visible factors must be at play. Among these is a widely used industrial solvent and common environmental contaminant little recognized for its likely role in PD: trichloroethylene (TCE). TCE is a simple, six-atom molecule that can decaffeinate coffee, degrease metal parts, and dry clean clothes. The colorless chemical was first linked to parkinsonism in 1969. Since then, four case studies involving eight individuals have linked occupational exposure to TCE to PD. In addition, a small epidemiological study found that occupational or hobby exposure to the solvent was associated with a 500% increased risk of developing PD. In multiple animal studies, the chemical reproduces the pathological features of PD.Exposure is not confined to those who work with the chemical. TCE pollutes outdoor air, taints groundwater, and contaminates indoor air. The molecule, like radon, evaporates from underlying soil and groundwater and enters homes, workplaces, or schools, often undetected. Despite widespread contamination and increasing industrial, commercial, and military use, clinical investigations of TCE and PD have been limited. Here, through a literature review and seven illustrative cases, we postulate that this ubiquitous chemical is contributing to the global rise of PD and that TCE is one of its invisible and highly preventable causes. Further research is now necessary to examine this hypothesis.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Tricloroetileno , Animais , Tricloroetileno/toxicidade , Tricloroetileno/análise , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Doença de Parkinson/etiologia , Solventes/toxicidade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
We present an artificial intelligence (AI) system to remotely assess the motor performance of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). In our study, 250 global participants performed a standardized motor task involving finger-tapping in front of a webcam. To establish the severity of Parkinsonian symptoms based on the finger-tapping task, three expert neurologists independently rated the recorded videos on a scale of 0-4, following the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The inter-rater reliability was excellent, with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88. We developed computer algorithms to obtain objective measurements that align with the MDS-UPDRS guideline and are strongly correlated with the neurologists' ratings. Our machine learning model trained on these measures outperformed two MDS-UPDRS certified raters, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.58 points compared to the raters' average MAE of 0.83 points. However, the model performed slightly worse than the expert neurologists (0.53 MAE). The methodology can be replicated for similar motor tasks, providing the possibility of evaluating individuals with PD and other movement disorders remotely, objectively, and in areas with limited access to neurological care.
RESUMO
The Parkinson's disease (PD)-specific Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) is an anxiety rating scale that has been validated in cross-sectional studies. In a study of buspirone for anxiety in PD, it appears that the PAS may be sensitive to change in anxiety demonstrating moderate-to-high correlation with participant-reported and clinician-administered scales.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traditional in-person Parkinson's disease (PD) research studies are often slow to recruit and place unnecessary burden on participants. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has added new impetus to the development of new research models. OBJECTIVE: To compare recruitment processes and outcomes of three remote decentralized observational PD studies with video visits. METHODS: We examined the number of participants recruited, speed of recruitment, geographic distribution of participants, and strategies used to enhance recruitment in FIVE, a cross-sectional study of Fox Insight participants with and without PD (nâ=â203); VALOR-PD, a longitudinal study of 23andMe, Inc. research participants carrying the LRRK2 G2019S variant with and without PD (nâ=â277); and AT-HOME PD, a longitudinal study of former phase III clinical trial participants with PD (nâ=â226). RESULTS: Across the three studies, 706 participants from 45 U.S. states and Canada enrolled at a mean per study rate of 4.9 participants per week over an average of 51 weeks. The cohorts were demographically homogenous with regard to race (over 95%white) and level of education (over 90%with more than a high school education). The number of participants living in primary care Health Professional Shortage Areas in each study ranged from 30.3-42.9%. Participants reported interest in future observational (98.5-99.6%) and interventional (76.1-87.6%) research studies with remote video visits. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of large, geographically dispersed remote cohorts from a single location is feasible. Interest in participation in future remote decentralized PD studies is high. More work is needed to identify best practices for recruitment, particularly of diverse participants.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Seleção de Pacientes , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pandemias , Doença de Parkinson/terapiaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: To recruit and characterize a national cohort of individuals who have a genetic variant (LRRK2 G2019S) that increases risk of Parkinson disease (PD), assess participant satisfaction with a decentralized, remote research model, and evaluate interest in future clinical trials. Methods: In partnership with 23andMe, Inc., a personal genetics company, LRRK2 G2019S carriers with and without PD were recruited to participate in an ongoing 36-month decentralized, remote natural history study. We examined concordance between self-reported and clinician-determined PD diagnosis. We applied the Movement Disorder Society Prodromal Parkinson's Disease Criteria and asked investigators to identify concern for parkinsonism to distinguish participants with probable prodromal PD. We compared baseline characteristics of LRRK2 G2019S carriers with PD, with prodromal PD, and without PD. Results: Over 15 months, we enrolled 277 LRRK2 G2019S carriers from 34 states. At baseline, 60 had self-reported PD (mean [SD] age 67.8 years [8.4], 98% White, 52% female, 80% Ashkenazi Jewish, and 67% with a family history of PD), and 217 did not (mean [SD] age 53.7 years [15.1], 95% White, 59% female, 73% Ashkenazi Jewish, and 57% with a family history of PD). Agreement between self-reported and clinician-determined PD status was excellent (κ = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99). Twenty-four participants had prodromal PD; 9 met criteria for probable prodromal PD and investigators identified concern for parkinsonism in 20 cases. Compared with those without prodromal PD, participants with prodromal PD were older (63.9 years [9.0] vs 51.9 years [15.1], p < 0.001), had higher modified Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores (5.7 [4.3] vs 0.8 [2.1], p < 0.001), and had higher Scale for Outcomes in PD for Autonomic Symptoms scores (11.5 [6.2] vs 6.9 [5.7], p = 0.002). Two-thirds of participants enrolled were new to research, 97% were satisfied with the overall study, and 94% of those without PD would participate in future preventive clinical trials. Discussion: An entirely remote national cohort of LRRK2 G2019S carriers was recruited from a single site. This study will prospectively characterize a large LRRK2 G2019S cohort, refine a new model of clinical research, and engage new research participants willing to participate in future therapeutic trials.
RESUMO
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the fastest-growing neurological disease in the world. A key challenge in PD is tracking disease severity, progression, and medication response. Existing methods are semisubjective and require visiting the clinic. In this work, we demonstrate an effective approach for assessing PD severity, progression, and medication response at home, in an objective manner. We used a radio device located in the background of the home. The device detected and analyzed the radio waves that bounce off people's bodies and inferred their movements and gait speed. We continuously monitored 50 participants, with and without PD, in their homes for up to 1 year. We collected over 200,000 gait speed measurements. Cross-sectional analysis of the data shows that at-home gait speed strongly correlates with gold-standard PD assessments, as evaluated by the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III subscore and total score. At-home gait speed also provides a more sensitive marker for tracking disease progression over time than the widely used MDS-UPDRS. Further, the monitored gait speed was able to capture symptom fluctuations in response to medications and their impact on patients' daily functioning. Our study shows the feasibility of continuous, objective, sensitive, and passive assessment of PD at home and hence has the potential of improving clinical care and drug clinical trials.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Estudos Transversais , Progressão da Doença , Marcha , Análise da Marcha , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Ondas de Rádio , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic forced the abrupt and rapid expansion of an alternative care model that embraces the use of video-based visits in the care of persons with Parkinson's disease. Video-based visits not only eliminate the risk of infection but also reduce geography- and disability-related barriers to accessing specialist care. Research has established that they are feasible, acceptable to persons with Parkinson's disease and patient-centered. In the Unites States, the relaxation of licensure requirements, adoption of reimbursement parity and investment in telemedicine infrastructure has enabled the rapid growth of video-based visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, we must turn our attention to ensuring that progress made in expanding access to video-based care is not lost and expanded worldwide. More work is needed to identify the optimal video-based care model, establish best practices, and ensure equitable access to care.
Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Telemedicina , COVID-19/complicações , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) research is hampered by slow, inefficient recruitment and burdensome in-person assessments that may be challenging to conduct in a world affected by COVID-19. Fox Insight is an ongoing prospective clinical research study that enables individuals to participate in clinical research from their own homes by completing online questionnaires. To date, over 45,000 participants with and without PD have enrolled. We sought to validate self-reported PD diagnosis in the Fox Insight cohort, assess the validity of other self-reported health information, and evaluate the willingness of participants to participate in video-based research studies. METHODS: Individuals with and without self-reported PD enrolled in Fox Insight were invited to participate in this virtual research study. Participants completed online questionnaires and two virtual visits, during which we conducted standard cognitive and motor assessments. A movement disorder expert determined the most likely diagnosis, which was compared to self-reported diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 203 participants from 40 U.S. states, 159 with remote clinician-determined PD and 44 without, completed the study (59% male, mean (SD) age 65.7 (9.8)). Level of agreement between self-reported PD diagnosis in Fox Insight and clinician-determined diagnosis was very good ((kappa = 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Overall, 97.9% of participants were satisfied with the study, 98.5% were willing to participate in a future observational study with virtual visits, and 76.1% were willing to participate in an interventional trial with virtual visits. CONCLUSION: Among the Fox Insight cohort, self-reported diagnosis is accurate and interest in virtual research studies is high.