American Academy of Optometry Microbial Keratitis Think Tank.

SIGNIFICANCE: Think Tank 2019 affirmed that the rate of infection associated with contact lenses has not changed in several decades. Also, there is a trend toward more serious infections associated with Acanthamoeba and fungi. The growing use of contact lenses in children demands our attention with surveillance and case-control studies. PURPOSE: The American Academy of Optometry (AAO) gathered researchers and key opinion leaders from around the world to discuss contact lens-associated microbial keratitis at the 2019 AAO Annual Meeting. METHODS: Experts presented within four sessions. Session 1 covered the epidemiology of microbial keratitis, pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the role of lens care systems and storage cases in corneal disease. Session 2 covered nonbacterial forms of keratitis in contact lens wearers. Session 3 covered future needs, challenges, and research questions in relation to microbial keratitis in youth and myopia control, microbiome, antimicrobial surfaces, and genetic susceptibility. Session 4 covered compliance and communication imperatives. RESULTS: The absolute rate of microbial keratitis has remained very consistent for three decades despite new technologies, and extended wear significantly increases the risk. Improved oxygen delivery afforded by silicone hydrogel lenses has not impacted the rates, and although the introduction of daily disposable lenses has minimized the risk of severe disease, there is no consistent evidence that they have altered the overall rate of microbial keratitis. Overnight orthokeratology lenses may increase the risk of microbial keratitis, especially secondary to Acanthamoeba, in children. Compliance remains a concern and a significant risk factor for disease. New insights into host microbiome and genetic susceptibility may uncover new theories. More studies such as case-control designs suited for rare diseases and registries are needed. CONCLUSIONS: The first annual AAO Think Tank acknowledged that the risk of microbial keratitis has not decreased over decades, despite innovation. Important questions and research directions remain.

CLEAR - Contact lens technologies of the future.

Contact lenses in the future will likely have functions other than correction of refractive error. Lenses designed to control the development of myopia are already commercially available. Contact lenses as drug delivery devices and powered through advancements in nanotechnology will open up further opportunities for unique uses of contact lenses. This review examines the use, or potential use, of contact lenses aside from their role to correct refractive error. Contact lenses can be used to detect systemic and ocular surface diseases, treat and manage various ocular conditions and as devices that can correct presbyopia, control the development of myopia or be used for augmented vision. There is also discussion of new developments in contact lens packaging and storage cases. The use of contact lenses as devices to detect systemic disease has mostly focussed on detecting changes to glucose levels in tears for monitoring diabetic control. Glucose can be detected using changes in colour, fluorescence or generation of electric signals by embedded sensors such as boronic acid, concanavalin A or glucose oxidase. Contact lenses that have gained regulatory approval can measure changes in intraocular pressure to monitor glaucoma by measuring small changes in corneal shape. Challenges include integrating sensors into contact lenses and detecting the signals generated. Various techniques are used to optimise uptake and release of the drugs to the ocular surface to treat diseases such as dry eye, glaucoma, infection and allergy. Contact lenses that either mechanically or electronically change their shape are being investigated for the management of presbyopia. Contact lenses that slow the development of myopia are based upon incorporating concentric rings of plus power, peripheral optical zone(s) with add power or non-monotonic variations in power. Various forms of these lenses have shown a reduction in myopia in clinical trials and are available in various markets.

An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers.

PURPOSE: This was a multi-site, 128-subject, bilateral crossover study to evaluate subjective comfort and slit-lamp findings with 1-day disposable contact lenses in a population of allergy sufferers during periods when allergen levels were elevated. METHODS: The study involved 1-month of single-use daily wear with a 1-day disposable test lens (1. DAY ACUVUE Brand Contact Lenses, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) and 1-month of daily wear with subjects' habitual lenses replaced to their usual replacement schedule. Pollen and mould counts were obtained for each site 1 week prior to the study and twice weekly throughout the study period. Subjective comfort and slit-lamp findings were recorded at baseline and after 1-month's wear of each modality. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of subjects agreed that the 1-day disposable lenses provided improved comfort when compared to the lenses they wore prior to the study, compared with 18% agreeing that the new pair of habitual lenses provided improved comfort. The 1-day disposable lenses showed greater improvement in slit-lamp findings from baseline than new habitual lenses. CONCLUSION: The use of 1-day disposable lenses is an effective strategy for managing allergy-suffering contact lens wearers.

The impact of silicone hydrogel materials on overnight corneal swelling.

PURPOSE: To identify the corneal swelling response associated with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects were recruited to participate in this single-center, controlled, single-masked, clinical trial. The corneal swelling response was evaluated by central corneal pachymetry after overnight wear of balafilcon A, etafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, senofilcon A, and no lens wear. More specifically, after 8 hours of closed-eye wear of each material, corneal thickness was measured immediately on eye opening, in addition to the first 4 hours of open-eye wear. Paired t tests were used to compare the swelling response from each condition to that associated with senofilcon A, and given the numerous statistical comparisons, a P value of

Influence of replacement schedule and care regimen on patient comfort and satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses.

PURPOSE: This study examines what effects replacement schedule and care regimen have on overall patient satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses. METHODS: Over 3000 patients were recruited from 313 ophthalmologic practices in France to participate in a 1-month prospective observational clinical study. Subjects included 2108 experienced and 957 novice users of the predominantly prescribed soft contact lenses and care systems in France. All subjects were required to use ACUVUE 2 (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) brand contact lenses, replaced once every 2 weeks, and using COMPLETE brand multipurpose solution (Allergan, Irvine, CA) during the study. Practitioners assessed lens fit, and refractive and ocular physiological status. Subjects were surveyed about various subjective attributes at the baseline examination and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction with the test lenses and care system was found to be excellent for the majority of patients, as evidenced by high subjective satisfaction ratings and the desire of approximately 9 of 10 subjects to continue using the test products after completing the study. Significant improvements were noted with the test lenses and solution compared to previous lenses and solutions for overall satisfaction and comfort variables. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing lenses once every 2 weeks combined with a multipurpose care system incorporating ingredients designed for lens conditioning contributed to significant improvements in lens wearing comfort. Thus, lens replacement frequency and lens-and-solution compatibility should be considered in addition to lens material and design when prescribing contact lenses for new or existing wearers.

Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term physiologic response to three soft lens materials with different oxygen permeability characteristics. METHODS: Forty-three neophytes were randomly prescribed Acuvue 2, Acuvue Advance (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care), or Focus Night & Day (CIBA Vision) for 4 weeks on a daily-wear basis. A further 19 subjects did not wear lenses (control). Experimental and control subjects were examined 2 and 4 weeks after dispensing. Ocular physiologic response was measured with a slitlamp biomicroscope in a strictly masked fashion. RESULTS: Limbal redness increased in the Acuvue 2 group compared with the other two groups. Conjunctival redness increased more in the Acuvue 2 group than in the Acuvue Advance group. More conjunctival staining was seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups compared with the Acuvue 2 group. Increased scores for papillary conjunctivitis were seen in the Focus Night & Day group compared with the Acuvue Advance group. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced level of limbal redness seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups suggests that these lenses provide more oxygen to the ocular surface than the Acuvue 2 lens to a degree that can be observed clinically. The conjunctival staining response was similar for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups. The results for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups for papillary conjunctivitis may reflect differences in their material and surface properties.