Effects of Rumination and Mindful Self-Focus Inductions During Daily Life in Patients With Remitted Depression: An Experimental Ambulatory Assessment Study.

Rumination has been proposed as an important risk factor for depression, whereas mindful attention is considered a protective form of self-focusing. Experimental studies have demonstrated differential effects of these modes when induced in the lab. However, their impact on daily life processes is poorly understood, particularly in individuals vulnerable to depressive relapses. The aim of our study was to examine short- and longer-term effects of repeated brief rumination and mindful self-focus inductions during daily life on momentary mood, cognitions, and cortisol in patients with remitted depression (rMDD) as well as in healthy individuals, and to identify their potential differential effects in these groups. The study involved repeated short ambulatory inductions of a ruminative or a mindful self-focus during daily life with additional assessments of momentary mood, rumination, self-acceptance, and cortisol over 4 consecutive days in a sample of patients with rMDD (n = 32, ≥2 lifetime episodes, age 19-55 years) and matched healthy controls (n = 32, age 21-54 years). Multilevel models revealed differential immediate effects of the two induction modes on all momentary mood and cognitive outcomes (all p's < .001), but not on cortisol. Detrimental effects of rumination over mindful self-focus inductions were particularly strong for cognitions in the patient group. Longer-term effects of the inductions over the day were lacking. This study underlines immediate deteriorating effects of an induced ruminative compared to a mindful self-focus on momentary mood and cognitions during daily life in patients with rMDD and in healthy individuals. The observed stronger rumination-related reactivity in patients suggests heightened cognitive vulnerability. Understanding rumination- and mindfulness-based mechanisms of action in real-life settings can help to establish mechanism-based treatment options for relapse prevention in depression.

[Diagnostic Performance and Validity of the German Version of the BDI-II - A Secondary Analysis with Data from Clinical and Nonclinical Samples]. / Diagnostische Performanz und Validität des deutschsprachigen BDI-II ­ Eine Sekundäranalyse mit Daten aus klinischen und nichtklinischen Stichproben.

OBJECTIVES: Study of the diagnostic performance and validity of the German Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in a large data set from multiple adult samples. METHODS: The BDI-II was assessed together with the SCID-I as external criterion in 638 individuals (385 currently or remitted depressed individuals, 253 controls). The screening performance of the BDI-II was calculated for suggested cut-offs from the BDI-II manual and for optimal cut-offs derived from ROC-analyses. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the BDI-II was high (> 0,90) and it showed plausible associations with construct-related scales. Optimal cut-off scores of 16+ resulted for MDE (Youden's J = 0.838) and of 14+ for DD (J = 0.814). CONCLUSIONS: The German BDI-II is a reliable und valid screening tool for detecting depressive episodes and depressive disorders in the adult population. Depending on prioritized goals different cut-off-values can be used.