Comparison of Operative Experiences of PGY-1 and PGY-2 General Surgery Residents During Night-Float vs. 24-Hour Call Systems.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to specifically compare the impact of a night-float system vs. a 24-hour call system on the number and types of cases performed by PGY-1 and PGY-2 general surgery residents to determine if both of these schedules could meet the ACGME first two-year 250 case minimum requirement, and if so, which schedule provided the best operative experience for PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of call schedules and operative case logs of PGY-1 and PGY-2 general surgery residents. Residents were separated into two groups based on type of call schedule: 24-hour vs. night-float. The case logs of PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents were obtained from the ACGME Case Log System and data analysis was performed between the two groups. SETTING: This study was performed at a general surgery residency at a hybrid academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three residents met inclusion criteria. Twenty-three were part of the night-float system and 20 were part of the 24-hour call system. RESULTS: Total cases and major cases for PGY-1 and PGY-2 years were compared between the two groups. The 24-hour call group had a significantly higher total number of cases than the night-float group (646.0 ± 181.5 vs. 504.8 ±148.9, p = 0.008). Major cases were also significantly higher in the 24-hour call group than the night-float group (418.5 ± 99.6 vs. 355 ± 99.5, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Both the 24-hour call and night-float systems were able to meet the ACGME first two year 250 case minimum requirement as well as follow work-hour guidelines. The 24-hour call system was associated with PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents having a better operative experience than the night-float system.

Progressive Surgical Autonomy Observed in a Hand Surgery Resident Clinic Model.

OBJECTIVE: Resident clinics (RCs) are intended to catalyze the achievement of educational milestones through progressively autonomous patient care. However, few studies quantify their effect on competency-based surgical education, and no previous publications focus on hand surgery RCs (HRCs). We demonstrate the achievement of progressive surgical autonomy in an HRC model. DESIGN: A retrospective review of all patients seen in a weekly half-day HRC from October 2010 to October 2015 was conducted. Investigators compiled data on patient demographics, provider encounters, operational statistics, operative details, and dictated surgical autonomy on an ascending 5 point scoring system. SETTING: A tertiary hand surgery referral center. RESULTS: A total of 2295 HRC patients were evaluated during the study period in 5173 clinic visits. There was an average of 22.6 patients per clinic, including 9.0 new patients with 6.5 emergency room referrals. Totally, 825 operations were performed by 39 residents. Trainee autonomy averaged 2.1/5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2), 3.4/5 (SD = 1.3), 2.1/5 (SD = 1.3), 3.4/5 (SD = 1.2), 3.2/5 (SD = 1.5), 3.5/5 (SD = 1.5), 4.0/5 (SD = 1.2), 4.1/5 (SD = 1.2), in postgraduate years 1 to 8, respectively. Linear mixed model analysis demonstrated training level significantly effected operative autonomy (p = 0.0001). Continuity of care was maintained in 79.3% of cases, and patients were followed an average of 3.9 clinic encounters over 12.4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our HRC appears to enable surgical trainees to practice supervised autonomous surgical care and provide a forum in which to observe progressive operative competency achievement during hand surgery training. Future studies comparing HRC models to non-RC models will be required to further define quality-of-care delivery within RCs.

Progressive Surgical Autonomy in a Plastic Surgery Resident Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Resident clinics are thought to catalyze educational milestone achievement through opportunities for progressively autonomous surgical care, but studies are lacking for general plastic surgery resident clinics (PSRCs). We demonstrate the achievement of increased surgical autonomy and continuity of care in a PSRC. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients seen in a PSRC from October 1, 2010, to October 1, 2015, was conducted. Our PSRC is supervised by faculty plastic surgery attendings, though primarily run by chief residents in an accredited independent plastic surgery training program. Surgical autonomy was scored on a 5-point scale based on dictated operative reports. Graduated chief residents were additionally surveyed by anonymous online survey. RESULTS: Thousand one hundred forty-four patients were seen in 3,390 clinic visits. Six hundred fifty-three operations were performed by 23 total residents, including 10 graduating chiefs. Senior resident autonomy averaged 3.5/5 (SD = 1.5), 3.6/5 (SD = 1.5), to 3.8/5 (SD = 1.3) in postgraduate years 6, 7, and 8, respectively. A linear mixed model analysis demonstrated that training level had a significant impact on operative autonomy when comparing postgraduate years 6 and 8 (P = 0.026). Graduated residents' survey responses (N = 10; 100% response rate) regarded PSRC as valuable for surgical experience (4.1/5), operative autonomy (4.4/5), medical knowledge development (4.7/5), and the practice of Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education core competencies (4.3/5). Preoperative or postoperative continuity of care was maintained in 93.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: The achievement of progressive surgical autonomy may be demonstrated within a PSRC model.